VC vs IB as a pathway to GE

Looking for some advice regarding 2 job opportunities, with my goal of joining a Growth Equity firm in Europe following a couple years of experience at one of the two below;

Opportunity 1. IB Analyst for a mid-tier Investment Bank, in their TMT division in the UK. Most exit opportunities were VC/GE shops.

Opportunity 2. VC Analyst for a ~$200 AUM VC based across Europe, does multi-stage tech investments, but primarily focuses on Seed and Series A. No clear exit opps given its a newish team. 

I'm leaning towards Opportunity 2 primarily because of the better WLB and also I'm just more interested in the opportunity. However, I'm concerned that the lack of modelling/quantitative tasks one might do on Seed/Series A investments, compared to what an IB Analyst may do, would hurt my chances when looking to move into GE.

Would really appreciate hearing what you guys think.


For our associate program (growth equity), we interviewed kids coming out of banking / private equity / public equities / other growth funds, but we did not interview anyone from early-stage investing backgrounds because, while they offered a complimentary skillset on sourcing and had a network that was additive to ours, the diligence skillset is completely different and we do not have the resources or the team size to train them effectively.


IB is probably better for junior level growth positions. We interviewed a lot of people with Series A/B VC backgrounds who had miles better investment acumen but just sadly lacked the technical aspect which is so key to add value... If you're dead set for late-stage growth think IB is safer but it's still going to suck to exit. Just make sure it's TechMT and not TelcoMT group or the net benefit is zero or negative


If you're dead set on moving into growth, go into banking first. It's quite difficult to transition from early stage to growth, as the skill sets are pretty different. And there's an expectation that a growth associate should be reasonably proficient in financial analysis, which you don't learn in early stage venture.

Most Helpful

I've done both banking and VC, now in growth equity. Agree with other folks, IB is still the way to go if your goal is true growth equity (minority & control stakes, cash efficiency) vs. late-stage venture. 

I actually think the venture background helps me more often day-to-day - finding interesting segments/businesses, building founder relationships, developing well-informed perspectives on new markets and their evolution. But the banking background fills in the rest, which even if it's not a day-to-day task, still is mission-critical to success:

- Most deals I work on are not clean, primary, minority VC deals but typically include some level of structure in the term sheet and occasionally leverage, seller notes, etc. 

- Post-LOI execution - coordinating third-party advisors (QoE, tax, legal, etc.) and past the first 1-2 years, playing a key role in negotiating definitive documentation and funkiness that comes up in specific situations, i.e. key man insurance. Overall being able to drive a deal from origination to close 

- Managing banked processes - a fair amount of the deals we look at involve a banker (typically a MM Tech IB). It does give you a leg up to know how they operate, how they might spin a story, and navigating the sometimes tricky dynamics of winning banked deals 

- Portfolio M&A - being able to support portcos in both M&A execution and on the sell-side, often without investment bank support, will become a critical part of the job and this is really only learned in IB or after a few reps in PE/growth 


Can i please PM you? Would love to hear more looking to move to something similar. Would really appreciate the time! 


Fuga et fugit eveniet sed qui et. Et quia veniam sint delectus quibusdam quia omnis saepe. Quae ducimus occaecati eveniet laudantium eum placeat nisi. Nam voluptatem quibusdam consequatur sunt sit aperiam. Perferendis et iure illo quia.

Sed placeat iure dolorem laborum ut aut. Voluptates porro aut est quam placeat. Laborum qui dolorem est possimus. Necessitatibus nihil odio et rerum et ut aut. Debitis placeat est eligendi. Fugiat rerum ipsum expedita aliquam aut. Cum est ut quod optio dolorum inventore modi.

Dolore totam soluta pariatur officiis. Minima perferendis alias fugiat ratione voluptatum quo. Dolores ratione ipsa in vel eligendi quo. Corporis id inventore laborum laboriosam totam et aliquam. Quos et aliquid necessitatibus possimus asperiores debitis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.9%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 25 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 04 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (147) $101
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”


redever's picture
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
BankonBanking's picture
Secyh62's picture
dosk17's picture
kanon's picture
GameTheory's picture
CompBanker's picture
Jamoldo's picture
numi's picture
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”