All debt buyout

Hi all - posting this in PE because I used to work in PE and you guys are better modelers than Corp types. Doing buyout model work for a firm that has a large revolver facility. They can do small to medium size deals of say $30-$150m entirely with revolver funds, so no equity check up front. How would you deal with this in the IRR calculation? I can't isolate sponsor returns with zero upfront outflow because IRR pukes without a negative flow upfront. So I have to look at firm returns with the entire purchase price outflow upfront (all debt funded) right? But then, do I need to subtract net remaining debt from the terminal value to isolate the sponsor returns? This doesn't seem right either, feels like a double-count. Thanks for any help.

6 Comments
 

We kind of pretend there is a full exit. Either using an exit multiple or more commonly a perpetuity to derive a terminal value. So the DCF ends up with the all debt purchase price up front, 5 years of UFCF, and a terminal value. We have typically not been subtracting net debt from terminal value, and running an IRR on the whole thing. But I started to question this practice and now can't figure it out.

 
Best Response

Are you trying to get to some ROE? If I'm a PE firm that LBO'ed a platform company, which later uses its revolver to buy bolt-ons, then upon exit of the entire pro forma company, I'd assume the PV input would be my initial equity check that I wrote and the FV would be total enterprise value less net debt at exit. Buying add-on companies using all debt is very common in PE and illustrates the power of leverage in enhancing equity returns. If you're just trying to isolate what the ROE is on the add-on that's fully funded with the revolver, I'm not sure what the point of the exercise is since it's a free option to the equity... maybe use -$0.01 as your PV, lol.

 

Yes, that's a great example. That's essentially what this situation is - a platform company buying bolt-ons at 100% leverage and we want to know the IRR of the bolt-ons. We look at dozens of targets each quarter so need a common way of comparing across them, and have been using a classic DCF format with (purchase price) + 5yrs UFCF + year 5 TV and running the IRR on that without subtracting any remaining net debt from the TV. I don't think we're going for an ROE view, just NPV and IRR, almost like any other capital investment project. Now that I'm writing this out, it seems clear that subtracting net debt would be a double count, because it is already "subtracted" in the purchase price. Does that sound right?

 

Suscipit impedit quam aperiam. Magnam ipsa iusto sapiente exercitationem sapiente omnis blanditiis nemo. In porro est nihil facere quis ex sequi.

Voluptatem quo nesciunt recusandae aut. Qui eligendi dolorem voluptatum numquam ut voluptatem. Nulla neque culpa voluptatibus aut distinctio velit consectetur. Ut cumque exercitationem dolorum modi aspernatur error.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”