Are hours of my life my only value-add in this space?

Pretty pessimistic post here, but currently working as a Summer Analyst at a boutique bank and starting to actually get a feel for what banking truly is as opposed to the superficial narrative everyone inside and outside of the industry submits to. With that, it's starting to feel like most of the work, specifically at the junior level, is less about critical thinking skills, intelligence, and financial acumen, and more so just about collecting and consolidating information for presentations and models. As a matter of fact, it seems like the only place that requires finesse in this industry is your people skills- looking good in front of the client, seeming intelligible, getting the client to bite on certain opportunities, etc. But, once again, you really don't have many opportunities to exercise that finesse as a junior person because you aren't front and center with the client. So given the relatively average talent required to do the work, it seems like the only real way to differentiate yourself from the competition is by putting in more time doing this cumbersome consolidation day in and day out so that your presentations and models come out crisp and you don't mess anything up. And this seems to make a lot of intuitive sense- since no bank can really offer a better product for their clients, the only thing they can do to compete is work their people until midnight frequently to get a slightly faster turnaround with a slightly more refined powerpoint deck.

So is that all this business comes down to? Are the "best and brightest" fighting their way to Wall Street just to compete on the basis of how much of their life they're willing to sacrifice to their work? The salary is certainly an incentive as is the prestige and "how much you learn," but I (naively) thought you would have to bring more to the table in these roles than just giving up your 20s.

Interested to hear A) if you agree with my thoughts or if I'm just a nihilistic incel and B) if I am a nihilistic incel- what do you bring to the table other than just your willingness to devote your time and energy to the deal process, more so than anybody else. Also, if you agree with my reckless analysis, but have some nuance to add, would be super happy to read about it.

 

At the junior level, there is a huge dispersion between people who take the time to understand what they’re doing vs those who require step by step instructions. A good analyst

1) understands every number in the materials, how it’s calculated and can explain in a clear and concise way

2) keeps up with what’s going on in the industry and remembers how they presented something in prior projects and can make suggestions based off of what they know

3) Checks their work thoroughly 

4) catches it if I make a mistake in instructions or if I’m forgetting something

5) is proactive - does things they know need to get done without waiting for instruction and learn over time what needs to get done in a process 

 

Probably going to get MS'd for this, but I don't care because it's true. 

As a junior, straight out of school, your only value is processing volume. You know nothing, you have seen nothing, so of course no one really cares about your opinion. The value to you, is you get to be in the room with people who's opinions matter a lot. You can observe them and learn what works, what doesn't, what style of negotiating might be more applicable to your own personality, etc. This is an apprenticeship business because the finer details and nuances are impossible to put into a textbook or classroom setting. You have to learn through experience. You will get no immediate value-add skill that you can begin to employ the next day or month, etc. and have to take a longer-term view on your skills building. 

 

There are a few dynamics at play. One is that as a summer analyst you're not going to get exposed to anything that resembles responsibility, unless it's on a fake project or something with a long lead time and very low priority. Although it sounds what you have in mind is more broad and not just related to your SA experience. 

As a full-time, the degree to which you get an opportunity to intellectually engage and show critical thinking skills, intelligence, acumen, etc. depends on the group you're in and its execution culture.

Some groups run lean teams, put a huge amount of of responsibility on juniors, throw you in the deep end and give you unstructured problems with little guidance. In those situations you'll get all the intellectual engagement you could want, but off-the-charts levels of personal stress too. Some groups run highly structured teams, with each level giving extremely crisp guidance to the level below them, in the interest of minimizing the number of iterations and ensuring the work product comes out precisely as intended. You'll find this experience much less stressful but also much less intellectually engaging. You will however learn best practices and experience less iteration-related frustration/anger. 

The situations where analysts can really add huge amounts of value (and are relied upon to add value) is when it comes to modeling. I don't mean valuation or merger modeling - if you're in a strong group you should have rock solid templates and just be plugging in inputs, which is more the type of "do easy things accurately" work you're describing / disliking. It's moreso with operating models, and particularly on the sellside, like when you get an internal model from a client with 100 sheets and crazy amounts of complexity, and need to make sense of it, audit it, and then rebuild it in a simplified way that is both perfectly accurate but also abstracts the more detailed inputs. There's no substitute for a good analyst with lots of brainpower, financial acumen, love for numbers, etc. on this type of stuff. 

But yes, to differentiate yourself from your other analysts, a lot of the time it's about doing intellectually "easy" things quickly and accurately, being predictive about next steps, catching things your seniors missed, adding value proactively by being up to date on what's going on in the industry, etc.

I think you're wrong about the way banks compete with each other though, it's really not about speed unless you're talking about a particular client that is full of ex-Moelis bankers who all got destroyed during their banking career and really truly value quick turnaround times. Banks definitely can offer "better products" for their clients – it's just case by case. Bankers get hired for their relationships with likely counterparties (and understanding of their internal bureaucracy - i.e. how to get a deal done), and for their tactical experience in negotiating and managing the flow of information. Occasionally they get hired for their valuation expertise, although in reality valuation is what the buyer/s are willing to pay, and banker-led valuation work is more of rubber stamp/guidance than a deal driver. 

 

The vast majority of the work that you will do for the first year of your job could be done by a conscientious 4th-grader.  

I come from down in the valley, where mister when you're young, they bring you up to do like your daddy done
 

Voluptatem veniam tempore ratione. Rerum neque aut beatae doloremque ex similique optio. Sapiente qui earum reprehenderit est minus cumque sequi labore. Maxime architecto odio dicta suscipit qui. Ut ducimus quos veniam. Deserunt molestiae autem tenetur alias blanditiis nesciunt amet.

Aliquam minima et beatae sed quae. Quae distinctio cum molestiae. Voluptatum rerum et et laudantium. Fuga debitis corporis rerum aspernatur. Id hic et rerum aliquid amet non et. Est sunt sequi illo hic.

Id explicabo consequatur qui et. Voluptatem quo sapiente dolorem et neque quasi placeat. Et voluptatem inventore rerum aspernatur dolorum molestiae ratione similique. Voluptate sint maxime aliquid optio nulla dolorum et. Aut nulla adipisci ipsam. Pariatur et laboriosam nobis saepe architecto animi. Voluptas animi eos quisquam repudiandae blanditiis. Pariatur quam dicta distinctio quo laudantium suscipit perferendis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”