Best Response

The term HF is often misused/misunderstood and should be used to describe the investment objective of a specific investment vehicle (a pool of capital). A manager (consisting of a team of people) can choose to manage however many investment vehicles in as many investment strategies as it chooses. When someone use the term "HF manager" it suggests that the team is primarily in the business of managing vehicles that qualify as HF strategies (non-traditional investment strategies, such as L/S credit/debt, special sitch/distressed, activism, etc. etc.). A larger manager such as Blackstone, for example, obviously has a PE business and also manages many pockets of capital that'd qualify as HF strategies.

 

HF and PE should both technically be used to describe the investment strategy of a pool of capital. Take Vista Equity for example. They're mostly known in the market as a "PE investor". It has raised 5 buyout funds and in the market raising a 6th (you can find this by Googling). However, Vista also invests in credit, albeit not a main strategy of theirs. Many large, traditional PE firms are now set up this way (Providence, Bain, THL, Carlyle, BX, KKR, list goes on and on). Using this same analogy, you can see that the manager is simply a team of people and PE/HF are just used to describe what the pools of capital they manage. The manager will have a reputation for "PE" or "HF" based on the history what they focus on and overall AUM mix on which strategies they focus on.

 

I don't quite understand this question. There are many legal/structural differences b/w a HF vehicle and a PE vehicle. One main difference is that PE vehicles typically lock up investors' money with a 5-year reinvestment life + next 5 years of wind-down and return of capital. Assets in the vehicle are typically valued quarterly and is a part of the monitoring process. Many HF vehicles have daily mark-to-market and investors have immediate (sometimes limited) redemption rights.

 

okay thanks. any recommendations on books for the technical aspects of setting up a HF or PE fund? I know there's some recommendations from WSO but they weren't exactly what I was looking for

 

Okay, let's separate the legal structure from the investment strategy.

  1. Legal structure -- MidtownParkAve sums it up pretty well. Essentially hedge funds are evergreen limited partnerships with redemption rights while PE funds have finite lives and little to no redemption rights.

  2. Investment strategy -- the term "hedge fund" covers a very wide range of potential investment strategies, but ultimately I would say the defining characteristics versus "private equity" are:

i) Investment horizon -- PE firms have longer investment holding periods than hedge funds. ii) Portfolio liquidity -- for the most part, HFs tend to invest in liquid, publicly traded securities while PE firms often invest in private companies (or invest in public companies and take them private). iii) Size/control of investments -- PE firms generally exercise control or at least substantial influence over their investments (by owning very portions of companies) while hedge funds usually have limited ability to directly assert control or influence.

These three things really go hand in hand: If you are taking large control stakes with a view to improving company operations to create value, your liquidity will be limited and your holding period will be long.

So from a strategy perspective, yes, a hedge fund can certainly make PE-"style" investments provided it is not restricted in doing so by its governing documents (and many large hedge funds do that). However, that creates a big problem when your investors have the ability to pull their money monthly/quarterly and your investments are large and illiquid...

 

Sit dolores esse laboriosam eum facere. Inventore fugiat aliquid voluptatem at ipsa. Dolores quia itaque sunt odio. Excepturi harum ex error ad reiciendis.

Est voluptas laudantium aut voluptate unde. Id iusto magni quo magnam laboriosam rem. Quis nostrum deleniti maiores earum officiis omnis. Non blanditiis beatae eum dicta soluta consectetur. Reiciendis eius quos vero beatae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (90) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”