Capital Structure for Private Acquisitions Under $20M?

Hey guys,

I'm a founder and angel that has built a few successful consumer brands, and I want to speed up growth of these companies. Most are sitting on a healthy amount of dry powder, and given low interest rates at the moment, I really want to put that cash to use and start doing acquisitions. Management of the co's and other shareholders are all on-board as well.

We are currently looking at companies with EBITDA of around $2M - $3M a year. So maybe worth $10M - $20M. As you can tell, my background has nothing to do with ibanking (haha).

I'm basically looking for help to figure out what I need to learn and have management learn so we can be somewhat knowledgeable before we jump into any sort of M&A.

Questions:

  1. What's the typical way most companies in the aforementioned range are valued? As an angel, when I buy into a consumer brand I typically go off an EBITDA multiplier and then discount the co. and also account for any low hanging fruit in terms of growth. Those deals are pretty small though as the companies I invest in are usually only doing $500k - $3M a year, and investing in an existing operation/management is very different than buying a co.

  2. What does the cap structure usually look like for these deals? I'm primarily wondering what safe assumptions would look like for what percentage of the transaction I can expect to be covered by senior debt, mezzanine, etc... Obviously this varies deal to deal, but I'm just trying to figure out if there is an average/expected structure for deals in this range.

  3. Are boutique ibanks the way to go for this kind of thing? Are most of them willing to work off pure commission and can they help source additional equity if needed?

  4. Are there any good learning resources for private transactions in the $10M - $20M range? I can't find much online as most information seems to pertain to mid-market transactions.

Thanks in advance for any guidance/help you can render and sorry about the n00b questions. Again, I'm not an ibanker but I've always loved the corporate finance side of things.

 
Best Response

There probably is a really good and/or long list somewhere on the internet but these are the few principles I can think of that are important to know.

Key principles:

1) Use an M&A expert for advice. A bad acquisition is an easy thing to fumble up, and could ruin the business. Have them guide you through the process, especially if it’s your first time or if there is little margin for error.

2) Ask your M&A expert questions on things you are unsure of, even if you think asking it sounds stupid.

3) Use a due diligence list when making an acquisition. We all forget things, especially if we’re busy doing other things like running a business.

4) Think about the soft things like reputational risk before buying the company. It’s not all about the numbers.

5) Find and work with people easy to work with. Whether it’s your advisers on a M&A transaction or the employee of the company you’re buying.

6) Don’t over-complicate the deal with fancy deal structures or superfluous legal paperwork. The M&A process is already completed as is.

There are key terms and valuation techniques I would encourage senior members to get to know and understand and can be found on any M&A-orientated website. These are important because in an ideal world management should be able run the origination and screening of deals for themselves before a potential deal reaches board for a proper vote to conduct further DD. I’m assuming you’re doing this already but management should be running through the industry conferences circuit: meeting advisors (tax, legal, financial, etc.), sizing up potential acquisitions and partnerships, and keeping up with trends in the industry. For answers to your questions see below:

1) For as long as companies have been bought and sold: EV to Rev and EV to EBITDA still remain the most common, even at the smaller end of the market. You may also see more creative valuation metrics based on an industry KPI. EV to Subscribers for a subscription/membership model makes sense as does a EV to EBITDARent multiple for a retail business. It’s important to note that these multiples are more complimentary to the overall valuation process than pure stand-alone valuations.

2) Rather than look to what is typical, structure the deal for the best return and what the company is capable of handling. A simple and straightforward capital structure works best, aiming to keep the number of debt lenders to a minimum. As you may know debt capacity can be determined by things like gearing ratios, coverage ratios, and cash flow expectations. Debt for companies under the $10M EBITDA mark are levered less than 3.5x and the mix is mostly weighted to senior debt. Unitranche is becoming more popular in the middle market, but it has its own pros and cons to consider.

3) Yes, banks and business brokers focusing on the lower middle market / growth & venture stages are the go-to. On fee structure - I don’t know about most. Some will work off pure commission especially if follow-on deals are agreed to, and some simply won’t. For those that insist on a retainer, there are ways to minimize or pay this fee as well. All in all, I think you get what you pay for, but keep in mind everything can be negotiated and don’t go with the first banker you meet.

Source additional equity – yes

4) You would want to look for “lower middle market”. I don’t have a specific site to recommend that can act as an inclusive resource, but I would take a look at what some M&A advisers publish on their websites, as many of them have primers, pamphlets, and other reading material for business owners.

All this being said I wouldn’t take too much time from the management of your company to try to teach them M&A when they should be focused on growing the business. Have them think about and forming investor case for each opportunity looking at things like synergy opportunities, and growth drivers. These are more important things for them to consider than the minutiae of M&A deal processes. I would recommend hiring a buy-side adviser to help on corporate development. Also, possibly hiring a former banker to run your corporate development in-house may be most beneficial, especially if you plan on doing a couple of acquisitions in a short to medium term. A good buy-side adviser can really help you avoid the common pitfalls of M&A and lend an independent voice to a deal (i.e. like when to back out of a deal).

P.S. If you’re looking for independent board members I would be happy to join. Haha.

 

Thanks for the reply!

I should clarify by the way that I'm not completely green to M&A, although I do appreciate you taking the time to write things up!

Going through your responses:

  1. I have access to a few M&A guys, but most of them are mid-market, and I don't really know anyone specialized in the $10M - $20M range. I haven't looked too hard either.

  2. Always.

  3. Yep.

  4. Yes, very aware of this as a CPG/consumer brands guy. When I invest in a co. I'm usually doing so for the reputation/reviews/brand + cash flow as CPG/consumer brands rarely have unique technology.

  5. Yes. I've been working 80 - 100 hours a week since I was 18 and love it solely because I always pick cool people to work with. If you can't have fun while you work then you'll get burned out way too fast.

  6. Agreed.


Re: other points:

  1. Looking at consumer brands most of the time so EBITDA really seems like the way to go.

  2. Agreed with simple & sensible. Any idea who I could speak to in order to better understand just how much debt I should be able to raise? There seems to be a lot of information floating around for bigger mid-market co's but nothing lower really. On the bottom end the only options seems to be SBA backed loans (1M - 5M transaction sizes).

  3. Yes, it's a tricky balance. My general philosophy in business is never to pay unless I'm getting results and it's worked out really well. I think motivating A-players with my track record should work well and maybe offering more back-end comp.

  4. Thanks!


Yes, I don't want them too focused on M&A which is why I'm the one dealing with it. None of the companies are really big enough to justify an in-house banker unfortunately.

Thanks for the offer re: board, but it doesn't really make sense for companies our size as they are so early stage!

oldrow:
There probably is a really good and/or long list somewhere on the internet but these are the few principles I can think of that are important to know.

Key principles:

1) Use an M&A expert for advice. A bad acquisition is an easy thing to fumble up, and could ruin the business. Have them guide you through the process, especially if it’s your first time or if there is little margin for error.

2) Ask your M&A expert questions on things you are unsure of, even if you think asking it sounds stupid.

3) Use a due diligence list when making an acquisition. We all forget things, especially if we’re busy doing other things like running a business.

4) Think about the soft things like reputational risk before buying the company. It’s not all about the numbers.

5) Find and work with people easy to work with. Whether it’s your advisers on a M&A transaction or the employee of the company you’re buying.

6) Don’t over-complicate the deal with fancy deal structures or superfluous legal paperwork. The M&A process is already completed as is.

There are key terms and valuation techniques I would encourage senior members to get to know and understand and can be found on any M&A-orientated website. These are important because in an ideal world management should be able run the origination and screening of deals for themselves before a potential deal reaches board for a proper vote to conduct further DD. I’m assuming you’re doing this already but management should be running through the industry conferences circuit: meeting advisors (tax, legal, financial, etc.), sizing up potential acquisitions and partnerships, and keeping up with trends in the industry. For answers to your questions see below:

1) For as long as companies have been bought and sold: EV to Rev and EV to EBITDA still remain the most common, even at the smaller end of the market. You may also see more creative valuation metrics based on an industry KPI. EV to Subscribers for a subscription/membership model makes sense as does a EV to EBITDARent multiple for a retail business. It’s important to note that these multiples are more complimentary to the overall valuation process than pure stand-alone valuations.

2) Rather than look to what is typical, structure the deal for the best return and what the company is capable of handling. A simple and straightforward capital structure works best, aiming to keep the number of debt lenders to a minimum. As you may know debt capacity can be determined by things like gearing ratios, coverage ratios, and cash flow expectations. Debt for companies under the $10M EBITDA mark are levered less than 3.5x and the mix is mostly weighted to senior debt. Unitranche is becoming more popular in the middle market, but it has its own pros and cons to consider.

3) Yes, banks and business brokers focusing on the lower middle market / growth & venture stages are the go-to. On fee structure - I don’t know about most. Some will work off pure commission especially if follow-on deals are agreed to, and some simply won’t. For those that insist on a retainer, there are ways to minimize or pay this fee as well. All in all, I think you get what you pay for, but keep in mind everything can be negotiated and don’t go with the first banker you meet.

Source additional equity – yes

4) You would want to look for “lower middle market”. I don’t have a specific site to recommend that can act as an inclusive resource, but I would take a look at what some M&A advisers publish on their websites, as many of them have primers, pamphlets, and other reading material for business owners.

All this being said I wouldn’t take too much time from the management of your company to try to teach them M&A when they should be focused on growing the business. Have them think about and forming investor case for each opportunity looking at things like synergy opportunities, and growth drivers. These are more important things for them to consider than the minutiae of M&A deal processes. I would recommend hiring a buy-side adviser to help on corporate development. Also, possibly hiring a former banker to run your corporate development in-house may be most beneficial, especially if you plan on doing a couple of acquisitions in a short to medium term. A good buy-side adviser can really help you avoid the common pitfalls of M&A and lend an independent voice to a deal (i.e. like when to back out of a deal).

P.S. If you’re looking for independent board members I would be happy to join. Haha.

 

Quia sed dolor eaque veritatis enim. Eum repellendus reprehenderit aliquam dignissimos at eos non. Blanditiis et velit repellendus rerum. Ut voluptatem consectetur ea. Illum modi quae minima aut ipsum atque. Voluptatem aut qui voluptatum earum voluptatem esse ab omnis. Laborum asperiores quia quisquam et.

Est perspiciatis incidunt ab voluptas quibusdam doloribus unde. Ducimus voluptatem rerum aliquam sit ducimus ad eligendi. Sint voluptas eum facilis iure. Ut cum eos rem voluptatem reiciendis ex soluta quidem.

Quo aliquid blanditiis molestiae sit est ipsum architecto. Deleniti atque omnis earum voluptatum reprehenderit tenetur culpa. Officia sunt hic ipsa at voluptas est. Voluptate ullam sit velit ab enim quo vel. Id amet rerum qui non dolores. Et libero asperiores temporibus nemo numquam et iste.

Odit nemo et iure beatae velit eos dolor doloribus. Ut libero qui et eos pariatur ut qui voluptas. Eos ea vel voluptates reprehenderit. Maxime est harum autem voluptatum. Et quae sed voluptas.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”