Chicago Booth vs. Dartmouth Tuck vs. London Business School?

First time visitor and user of this site, but have heard some good things. Anyway, I’m looking to shift into finance (ideally S&T or IM) after spending 5 years in consulting. My finance experience is limited, apart from a college internship at Lehman in a middle/back office role, and an Equity Research role for ~6 months at a hedgefund / mutual fund immediately after graduation. As a result, I applied to some MBA programs in order to make the transition to finance, and am currently deciding between Chicago Booth, Dartmouth Tuck, and London Business School. At the same time, I’ve had some folks tell me that the MBA isn’t the best route, and that a CFA or a Master’s in Finance would be a better approach. Looking for any advice here on:

a. Whether an MBA is even the right route

b. If so, which school would be the best

My current evaluation has me leaning toward Booth, given its quantitative focus and the specified nature of some of the classes. They also gave me a scholarship for 50% tuition. On the other hand, my favorite school in terms of fit and all was Tuck (~25% scholarship), and I’ve heard great things about the network, which I think will be especially important for facilitating such a career shift. LBS is lower on my priority given what a mess Europe is right now, but it’s reputation for finance was what drew me to it.

 

Chicago and Tuck both place very well and have similar amounts of spots per student. An MBA seems to make a lot of sense for you. You will probably have more fun at Tuck, especially if you enjoy outdoor activities over city life. Whether that is worth the $30k tuition difference is up to you. Also, although Chicago is known as a finance school, Tuck has some great finance profs, including Ken French, insofar as you care about intellectual finance.

 
Best Response

I will also chime in for Booth. I could talk about why Booth all day, but for your particular case I will focus on one thing I think is particularly important: The flexibility of the curriculum.

As I'm sure you know, Booth allows its students to essentially design their own MBA over two years, which I think is invaluable to career changers. Coming without a ton of finance background, this means that you can load up on finance in the first three quarters of your MBA, so that come summer time, you can hopefully be a step above the rest of the competition.

Now, it's true that interviews for IM and S&T will be held in January, meaning you will only have one quarter + 2-3 weeks of another quarter under your belt, but being able to front-load your Investments and Stats classes will be extremely valuable.

If you are still having trouble deciding, best advice I can give you is to reach out to a few people at each school who are pursuing the career paths you're looking at. They can give you the best perspective on recruiting, experience, classes, etc.

 

Thanks - good stuff all around. I actually just got back from Booth's admit weekend and it definitely seemed like a solid place. The ability to front load classes, and the specified nature of those classes is a huge draw. At the end of the day, I think it makes the most sense (as much as I'd love skiing and rock climbing every weekend in New Hampshire). The two people from the S&T club were great too, and had secured some pretty solid internships.

PS - meabric, the other half of Fama French model is a professor at Booth (Fama).

 

Booth easily. This one is a no-brainer. Tuck is a general management school; it does do well with private equity and long-only mutual funds in Boston, but weak in trading, hedge funds, and non-boston IM. They also offer very few finance electives that will be relevant to your areas of interest while Booth offers a plethora of challenging dynamic courses. And with the flexible curriculum you can take the classes that will help you with internship interviews right away. In contrast, Tuck's first-year curriculum is fairly rigid, sort of similar to HBS in that regard.

As for LBS, one of the most overrated b-schools in the world. The caliber of the student body there is quite low, and London finance job market is getting slaughtered.

 
GarrigusForPresident:
So you guys are saying I should go to LBS, right?
If you are planning to work in the U.S then you should probably go with Booth or Tuck. However, if you want to work in Europe (/London) then I think you should consider LBS. They enjoy a very good reputation and their MBA program has excellent placement.
 
Kejsaren:
GarrigusForPresident:
So you guys are saying I should go to LBS, right?
If you are planning to work in the U.S then you should probably go with Booth or Tuck. However, if you want to work in Europe (/London) then I think you should consider LBS. They enjoy a very good reputation and their MBA program has excellent placement.

Was just cracking jokes. It's looking like Booth in a landslide, which is pretty much where I was at before the post. Thanks for the insight though. Am probably going to try to avoid Europe given the market conditions there, but thanks again.

 
West Coast Analyst:
Can you share with us your other metrics, such as GMAT / Undergrad / GPA? And whether you used MBA consultants and what not? :) This will help prospective monkeys a lot!

760 / Small East Coast Lib Arts College / 3.7

I used someone to review my essays, but not the ones for these 3 schools. It also wasn't what you'd call a full blown MBA consultant.

Feel free to shoot me a PM if you'd like to talk more about the process. Though I'm sure there is already an abundance out there on the MBA admissions process.

 

Ea provident ea inventore et. Aliquid sit blanditiis sit qui et ducimus. Vel et sequi vero quo. Atque a ducimus rerum aut et et. Nihil et sit et corrupti harum et laudantium.

Ipsum tempore eos accusantium voluptates nisi optio. Autem error cupiditate consequuntur omnis debitis iusto.

Rerum in voluptas in nulla. Dicta eaque qui et aut rerum architecto corporis sit. Et natus tempora quia est doloremque omnis ut. Illum deserunt libero accusamus.

Porro aut voluptatem id beatae. Dignissimos magnam neque quia molestiae omnis accusamus exercitationem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (85) $262
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (65) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (198) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (143) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
5
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”