Do BB bankers really make that much money when you adjust for the cost of living?

Most of the big banks are in New York and Glassdoor has their salary between $100-$150k first year. $150k is like $60-$70K In Texas dollars.

 

It's worse at the analyst level, most need to have a roommate or two in order to survive off their salary. But that's partly because when they do get out of the office, many go all out with vacations, dinners, bottles at clubs etc. If someone is frugal they can save a good chunk of cash even as an analyst. $150k is basically what a first/second year analyst makes all in, and to anyone outside finance that's a very good comp.

Once you get to associate comp and later, you should be fine in New York. You wont be able to ball out in a two bedroom apartment all by yourself, but on the flipside a $300 dinner every once in a while wont kill you.

 
xgozax:

I've frugal as hell. What do you think?

Consumption creeps up on you. IP in 2017 spends money differently than he did in 2010. The rusty honda (whose bottom is literally falling apart due to rust) is getting replaced with a used Lincoln or Buick. However, it will still have a trailer hitch installed.

You will start off by splitting a four bedroom flat with a kooky roommate in Jersey City and eventually graduate to a fifth floor walkup studio on 11th ave.

But yes, in Manhattan I lived in a fifth floor studio walkup. In Chicago I own a 46th floor 900 square foot condo with a partially obstructed view of Lake Michigan, an indoor pool, and an elevator. The condo costs less than the fifth floor Manhattan walkup.

But in the meantime, save as much as you can, and never forget what a dollar gets you in the Midwest.

 

Oh god its like $35k/year. Might as well work 3 jobs. To me, IB comp doesn't make much sense. My dad works 2 jobs that require an associates degree for around 70-80 hours week and makes 100k/yr.

Have even taken high taxes into consideration.

Let me hear you say, this shit is bananas, B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
 

Nobody works IB for the analyst comp - they do it for more lucrative opportunities or to climb the ladder. If you're such a chimp that you can't understand the difference between your dad earning 100k near or at the peak of his career, vs. an analyst that STARTS at 150K and can make $1MM or more as an MD in 12-15 years, then I don't know how else to explain this to you. Now of course, that's not guaranteed, but that's why IB is a hard industry to be in. And yes, while most people I know who went to IB left after their analyst years - ALL of them are in comfortable 9-5 jobs that pay 200K+ now (before 30), or are in PE making quite a bit more.

You're comparing apples to oranges when you're comparing somebody in his 40s or 50s to somebody who's 22.

 

What I'm trying to say is there are better career opportunities. VC and PE hire out of undergrad. Elite Boutiques have much higher compensation. Tech. Corporative Development. The list goes on.

Let me hear you say, this shit is bananas, B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
 
Best Response

Dawg, I made an active choice to leave IB and pursue consulting.

BTW - how many opportunities are there in VC/PE out of undergrad? You'll be doing bitch work, same as IB analyst. The best opportunities generally only hire after IB analyst years.

Same thing holds for EBs. And not everyone wants to pursue tech.

Also, arguing with some random college student from some shit state university on the internet that spells 'corporate' as 'corporative' is a waste of my time. See ya later.

Edit: WAIT, EVEN BETTER. I looked up your old threads and you're the moron from community college with a 2.8 GPA. Great story, still a moron.

 

I think the OP's main questions is if you look at people at equal points in their career, let's say 2 people are VPs at GS and one lives in NY while the other lives in (insert random smaller city here) etc, is living in NY worth it (Do you get paid more in NY than in small city)?

That answer is most likely a case by case analysis. Consisting of how much the individuals make, how far the dollar goes in their respective city, and as I mentioned in my post below - what are the extras that people are spending those dollars on. (I used 5 star hotels as an example).

I would say that yes, all else being equal and assuming that the VPs above have the exact same salary perfectly adjusted for CoL. The NY VP makes more overall than the small city VP because the NY VP can buy more "extras"

...
 
deMaestro:

Why is nobody here talking about the kid from Colgate University who's gonna work at the M&A department of Goldman Sachs? Isn't he going to make 7 or even 8 figures after 10 years at GS?

What I was thinking...

GoldenCinderblock: "I keep spending all my money on exotic fish so my armor sucks. Is it possible to romance multiple females? I got with the blue chick so far but I am also interested in the electronic chick and the face mask chick."
 

As someone who does not live in a high CoL area, but makes good money and doesn't have to work intense hours very frequently, it is hard for me to ever want to go into banking. My salary adjusted to NYC, places me at a very comfortable level in NYC - BUT when you look down the line, the difference becomes the style of living that one is capable of. If I went on vacation could I stay at a 5 star hotel? If I want it to be a hefty % of my total yearly income sure, but no doubt that a well performing analyst could. These types of "purchases" become your standard as your career in IB progresses, for myself they will be more special occasion luxuries.

Everything becomes about pricing and what % of income an item is. While rent and food may be far more expensive in NYC than it is where I am, the bankers will get more "nice" things.

...
 

This is a fairly salient question, particularly if one is moving from say a tier 2 or 3 city to New York or London. I'm personally okay with a 15-20% pay bump in this scenario at a minimum, but this is assuming greater promotion prospects and most critically, the optionality (depending on industry of course) that a city like NY or London offers versus in this example say Minneapolis or Houston. You just have to accept you are paying for that. With all that said, it would have to be a better fit role-wise.

 

Within the US, there are only two costs that I would adjust for cost-of-living, and I would adjust them incrementally from salary using absolute figures, not %s. The two costs are:

  1. Housing, specifically rent
  2. State & local taxes Everything else we consume basically costs the same everywhere (thanks to Costco, Amazon, etc).

For example, soon I will be relocating from Chicago to the Bay Area. Let's say I currently make $130k pre-tax in Chicago.

  1. Two bedroom high-rise apartment in downtown Chicago costs $3,000/month. Similar apartment in Silicon Valley is $4,000/month. I know I can find much more expensive housing in SF but this is just an illustration. $12,000/year difference post-tax is equivalent to $18,000 pre-tax.
  2. Illinois state income tax is 3.75%. California state income tax is 7% (this is the net rate for $130k/year). So I'm paying an extra $4k in state taxes by moving to California.

Which means I would need to make $152k in the Bay Area to equal $130k in Chicago. But note, this also means that if I made $200k in Chicago, I would only need to make $225k in the Bay Area. In my experience, Bay Area jobs pay significantly more than Chicago jobs, even after accounting for this cost-of-living difference.

The point is, if you're negotiating salary on a job in a "low-cost-of-living" city, make sure to do the specific math instead of swallowing the standard "our city is X% cheaper" line from HR.

Note: Buying a house would make this calculation significantly different, but I'd argue that buying real estate is a consumption choice, not a true cost-of-living.

 

Not sure how you're coming up with your estimates, but you can actually save a decent amount in NY. Things that are more expensive in other cities (like travel in sf/LA) are cheaper in ny.

My brother worked in NY as an ib analyst. All in comp was $150k, $180k, $210k over the three years.

For tax, don't look at the tax bracket rate, that doesn't make sense. You need to look at effective tax rate, which is ~35% on all-in comp. that brings you to $98k, $117k, $137k.

Less $25k for rent and $10k for living expenses. that brings you to $63k, $82k, $102k.

spend another $10k per year on god knows what and you'll still average $70k per year in savings.

 

When you adjust your salary for income taxes, state taxes, city taxes and cost of living you're probably make the same per hour as a McDonald's employee. The only difference is you work more hours

 

I don't have time to read all the comments right now, but the short answer is no.

When you adjust for the following the income drops pretty quickly:

  • High Taxes in NYC

  • High COL in NYC

  • Twice the average hours a person works - This one is killer, divide 120K by 4000 and the hourly rate drops quickly to that of a Chik Fil A manager. Of course this is only true at the very entry levels, moving up brings significant pay bumps.

When you break it down they still make more money, but they work more too. As previously mentioned, a bigger reason people go into the field is for the exit opportunities it presents.

 

I would not let location, or costs affect your choice of career. I would figure out your end goal and work backwards from there. This is something I tell a lot of people. Sort of like a binomial model tree, there are many paths to achieve your goals in life. If your goal is purely to make as much money as possible then get into sales and kill it. If your goal is to have a great career but focus mostly on your side hustle/enjoying life, then find something MO and still make a ton of money but just a little slower.

Keep moving towards your goals and stay motivated and educated.

 

Wow - so much IB defensiveness and bashing here.

I grew up in the suburbs in a Southern state. The mortgage on the house I grew up in (middle/upper middle close) was approximately half of what I now pay to rent a small one bedroom in Manhattan. I used to be of the "this is way too expensive stupid cold why does anyone live here" variety but I've come to appreciate it.

Five (or 3) years ago me would kick me in the balls for saying it, but I can understand why people that can afford it pay up to be in NYC. NYC is a city on a scale different from any in the U.S. (I say this having lived in SF and Chicago, though not LA/Miami). World class everything (food, transportation, entertainment, culture, arts, social opps, diversity, job opportunities). In exchange you have one good that is stupidly expensive: housing (ok, alcohol too). If you are over the threshold where your salary can absorb a few GS a month of rent/housing (say guaranteed $150K/yr) it is, dare I say, worth it.

Obviously, the calculus changes as you age/ go through different phases of life. Once you have kids (or even a serious relationship), the value of a lot of NYC amenities (esp. entertainment and social opps) plunge b/c you no longer take as much advantage. Your costs also tend to rise and become less flexible (kids). At that point I can see why you'd want to go elsewhere (elsewhere being Chicago/SF/ parts of Virginia, think it would be hard to go back to a Southern suburb).

 
dazedmonk:

Wow - so much IB defensiveness and bashing here.

I grew up in the suburbs in a Southern state. The mortgage on the house I grew up in (middle/upper middle close) was approximately half of what I now pay to rent a small one bedroom in Manhattan. I used to be of the "this is way too expensive stupid cold why does anyone live here" variety but I've come to appreciate it.

Five (or 3) years ago me would kick me in the balls for saying it, but I can understand why people that can afford it pay up to be in NYC. NYC is a city on a scale different from any in the U.S. (I say this having lived in SF and Chicago, though not LA/Miami). World class everything (food, transportation, entertainment, culture, arts, social opps, diversity, job opportunities). In exchange you have one good that is stupidly expensive: housing (ok, alcohol too). If you are over the threshold where your salary can absorb a few GS a month of rent/housing (say guaranteed $150K/yr) it is, dare I say, worth it.

Obviously, the calculus changes as you age/ go through different phases of life. Once you have kids (or even a serious relationship), the value of a lot of NYC amenities (esp. entertainment and social opps) plunge b/c you no longer take as much advantage. Your costs also tend to rise and become less flexible (kids). At that point I can see why you'd want to go elsewhere (elsewhere being Chicago/SF/ parts of Virginia, think it would be hard to go back to a Southern suburb).

+SB, I agree with this 100%. Obviously people have varying opinions but Dazedmonk says it perfectly. If you want to live in NYC and have an opportunity there then take it. I personally chose a second tier city with a high salary. My decision was driven on giving me the ability to focus on things outside of work (sports/traveling) while still making good money.

 

Yeah I think this is really what attacked the core of the problem and answer all the relevant questions. Glad to know that this has become such a popular thread.

Would like to say I did make this discussion more heated and less rationale by inserting "liberal" and "shithole" into it, but perhaps we may have not arrived at these conclusions without it.

Great job man, if I was an MD, I would hire you. You executed were all other monkeys failed.

Let me hear you say, this shit is bananas, B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
 

Nam velit eos animi molestias voluptatem voluptatem non quasi. Dicta velit repellat pariatur quos. Modi tempora cum qui. Id minima ullam omnis et illo eveniet et deleniti. Quam cumque blanditiis nihil. Dolor quo quam tempora ipsa blanditiis qui dolorum eos.

Adipisci aut qui nisi quisquam. Reprehenderit perspiciatis voluptate id qui sint voluptatem atque. Pariatur dolorem quisquam aliquam.

 

Quibusdam magnam distinctio reiciendis ut et. Quasi inventore ea a eligendi. Voluptatem sed qui modi quam ut unde omnis voluptatem. Odio dolorem occaecati quaerat dolores. Ipsa ea et mollitia explicabo perspiciatis error ducimus. Distinctio molestias possimus ullam provident id.

At voluptatem optio adipisci ut voluptatem soluta libero. Quas dolorum minima cupiditate accusamus suscipit voluptatem velit. Voluptas deleniti aspernatur sit totam.

Voluptatum distinctio qui et occaecati tenetur. Expedita dignissimos laboriosam voluptatum ut. Voluptates quaerat ut molestias ut nulla consequatur.

Expedita rerum nihil excepturi et eius ad. Enim aliquid minus commodi magnam ad voluptatem. Velit qui pariatur temporibus pariatur molestias corrupti consequatur omnis. Corrupti voluptatem et libero consequuntur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”