Email Structure - Structure for a number of firms?
hey guys,
Does anyone know the email structure for any of the following firms (IBD):
- Moelis
- Lehman Brothers NY/Toronto
- Credit Suisse NY/Toronto
- UBS NY/Toronto
Ie. Is it [email protected]?
Thank you.
[email protected] first.last@UBS.com [email protected] first.last@Moelis.com
I think the PE group at Lehman is [email protected] (for john doe).
Legendary throwback.
thanks alot for the timely response my friend.
do SA's get email addresses given to them too? I.e. at a BB summer internship?
Yes.
Are interns on the trading floor given a blackberry as they are in banking?
I have one and don't particularly want another, might get robbed!
Depends on which bank, which office, etc.
Anyone know the e-mail structure for Morgan Stanley?
[email protected]
Thanks
first_last@ML.com first.last@UBS.com first.last@GS.com and... [email protected] (some people may want to know this?)
last@Evercore.com
May I add another request? What about Citigroup, and especially for local offices (like Milan, Italy)?
Why don't we pour the email structures for all companies, and then I'll make a compilation? May be useful for current and future monkeys...
first.last@Citi.com
Probably the same for local offices.
Hey Nightbreeze, are you interested in working Milan as well?
couple more requests:
first.last@Macquarie.com first.i.last@JPMorgan.com
where "i" is a middle initial
Deutsche Bank is First.Last@DB.Com
Of course, it's just first.last@JPMorgan.com if the person doesn't have a middle initial.
Damn, that middle initial could be a serious filter at JPM.
i.e. you meet someone casually, get their first and last name, but you can't email them unless you know their middle name? Or will first.last work even if they do have a middle initial?
Nope, the idea is that if you're internal you can look them up on Lotus Notes. The big pain for the JPM crew is that the no middle initial crew (NMI in military parlance) goes by first.x.last on lotus notes, so people are forever sending to first.x.last@JPMorgan.com from outside emails, not realizing that the internal name structure is different from the external name structure.
There are always exceptions. For people with same first/last names, the other firms sometimes do the middle initial, or even more screwed up variations, like flast3@ML.com for example.
Yikes, having different internal and external email addresses sounds like a complete nightmare. And think about the exception to the exception: guys with Xavier as a middle name.
Just send a email with [email protected], [email protected].....
takes 1 minute to make up the whole list. I did that many times.
That's very interesting GenghisKhan! I was wondering why such a high proportion of JPM people in my address book have X as a middle initial!
So, as for now, we have the following list:
Goldman Sachs> [email protected] Morgan Stanley> [email protected] Credit Suisse> [email protected] UBS> [email protected] Merrill Lynch> [email protected] Lehman Brothers> [email protected] Deutsche Bank> [email protected] JPMorgan> [email protected] where i stands for initial of the middle name > [email protected] if there is no middle name Citigroup> [email protected] Evercore> [email protected] Macquarie Group> [email protected] Moelis> john.doe@Moelis.com
I will pester you now for the remaining.
So, what about: -HSBC -Lazard -Greenhill -Dresden Kleinwort -BNP Paribus -Barclays -Royal Bank of Scotland -Fortis -Wachovia -Rotschild -Societe Generale -Perella Weinberg -Cowell -Blackstone M&A -Houlihan Lokey
And so on...?
Dresdner (with an "R") Kleinwort = [email protected]
Lazard = [email protected]
Perella Weinberg = [email protected] [initial=first initial]
Houlihan Lokey = initiallast@HLHZ.com [initial = first initial] e.g. [email protected]
Current:
Goldman Sachs> [email protected] Morgan Stanley> [email protected] Credit Suisse> [email protected] UBS> [email protected] Merrill Lynch> [email protected] Lehman Brothers> [email protected] Deutsche Bank> [email protected] JPMorgan> [email protected] where i stands for initial of the middle name > [email protected] if there is no middle name Citigroup> [email protected] Evercore> [email protected] Macquarie Group> [email protected] Moelis> [email protected] Dresdner Kleinwort> [email protected] Lazard> [email protected] Perella Weinberg> [email protected] Houlihan Lokey> jdoe@HLHZ.com
Remaining
-HSBC -Greenhill -BNP Paribus -Barclays -Royal Bank of Scotland -Fortis -Wachovia -Rotschild -Societe Generale -Cowell -Blackstone M&A
...others? Keep it coming, even with the boutiques.
Greenhill: jdoe@Greenhill.com BNP Paribas (North America): [email protected] SocGen (may be only for Canada): [email protected] Blackstone: doe@Blackstone.com
Cheers for brisbane!
So, the new list is:
Goldman Sachs> [email protected] Morgan Stanley> [email protected] Credit Suisse> [email protected] UBS> [email protected] Merrill Lynch> [email protected] Lehman Brothers> [email protected] Deutsche Bank> [email protected] JPMorgan> [email protected] where i stands for initial of the middle name > [email protected] if there is no middle name Citigroup> [email protected] Evercore> [email protected] Macquarie Group> [email protected] Moelis> [email protected] Dresdner Kleinwort> [email protected] Lazard> [email protected] Perella Weinberg> [email protected] Houlihan Lokey> [email protected] Greenhill> jdoe@Greenhill.com BNP Paribus(North America): [email protected] (perhaps it goes on with asia, europe (or emea?) SocGen(Canada): [email protected] Blackstone: doe@Blackstone.com
Still unknown: -HSBC -Barclays -Royal Bank of Scotland -Fortis -Wachovia -Rotschild -Cowell
so at Evercore and blackstone, what happens when there are two people with the same last name? doe2@Evercore.com and [email protected]?
nightbreeze - thanks for compiling the list. One edit though: you spelled BNP Paribas wrong (there shouldn't be a "U" in it).
Is it safe to assume that higher up at a firm get emails that differ from this structure (i.e., could I send an email to lloyd.blankfein@GS.com)?
I know a guy who worked for JPM and his external AND internal address was first.x.last@JPMorgan.com. He didn't have a middle initial. So I guess it varies.
Also, I wouldn't be so sure with Citi's Italian office. Could be for the US offices, but I know for fact that some european offices use first.last@Citigroup.com.
first.i.last@us.HSBC.com and several other email structures for other geographies
first.i.last@us.Rothschild.com first.last@Rothschild.co.uk
Does anyone know Miller Buckfire?
[email protected]
.
Clarification on the JPMorgan e-mail addresses. Prior to the JPM/Chase merger, heritage JPMorgan staff had the structure [email protected]. Chase had the middle initial. New employees by default get the [email protected] structure, even if they don't specify a middle name. Of course, some hertiage Chase staff found out and fought to get the first.last structure as well, so there are a few exceptions.
Even with the middle intial, there are duplicates. I know a couple off the top of my head, sometimes the duplicate gets the X initial or if there is a second letter, they place both initials in ([email protected]). Of course, once two initials were allowed to be placed, someone in the London office got the bright idea to make their middle intials "UK" for their e-mail.
One reason for the high number of duplicates is because the internal server doesn't differentiate between different domain names. So first.x.last@jpmorgan goes the the same address as @chase.com, @jpmchase, @bankone.com, and soon bear.com). Just think of how many "bankers" (aka tellers) work for Chase and you can see why there are so many duplicates.
[email protected]
Does anyone have Oppenheimer's email structure? Trying to reach out to a buddy of mine, but I don't have his email on hand. Many thanks.
.
I used to work for JPM, the x in john.x.doe@JPMorgan.com designates that the employee doesn't use or doesn't have a middle name on their employee records. So for instance, if John Andrew Doe used his middle name in his employee record, his email structure would be [email protected]. If he didn't use his middle name on his employee record the structure would be [email protected]. I hope this clarifies.
I know these are IB firms, but does anyone know the format for these firms:
1) Pantheon Ventures 2) Unitas Capital 3) Primus Capital 4) Apax Partners 5) Olympus Capital
Thanks - much appreciated!
centerview?
Is the PWP one correct? I mailed two people who are currently listed on the website and both mails bounced. How do you account for middle names?
No, the PWP format is actually wrong. It should be [email protected]
{Deleted} ...read that the e-mail structures I listed were already posted.
Anyone have suntrust?
Also, if anyone has access to JPMorgan's emails, I would like to contact 2 guys but I don't have their middle initial. Is there anyway I can bypass that?
Thanks, Drexel.
Don't think RBS has been mentioned, but it's [email protected]
Anyone know the email structure for KKR?
Nvm, got it. It's [email protected]
Does anyone know if the bear email addresses still work? What does the convention look like to someone who transitioned from Bear to JP Morgan?
Looking for following:
Brevan Howard Moore Capital Tudor Balestra Hayman Capital Advisors
This is a really helpful thread. I think it should be stickied.
Can anyone confirm the format for Rothschild NY? Is it [email protected]? Thanks in advance!
Looking for Nomura, and need to know if a trader at SocGen would be under a different extension than an investment banker.
FXTrading - [email protected]
anyone know the format for centerview partners?
Great thread!
Anyone have the correct format for PWP? The one listed does not work.
I already posted the correct format for PWP in this thread.
The one for Centerview is [email protected]
It must be the spam control because I used your format and it keeps getting bounced.
Does anyone know what to do with the blackstone (M&A) email format? The [email protected] doesn't work well b/c some people at the firm have the same last name.
Spam control won't bounce an email. Most likely, they are no longer at PWP.
BX also uses [email protected] and [email protected]
Hey guys. I'm still having problems reaching several people at PWP and BAML. I tried using several different formats including the suggested ones in this thread. Does anyone know what the correct formats are?
BAML is a bitch to get right.
I believe that first.last@baml.com works, also try [email protected] if they were at ML first.
SAC Capital SIG (trading) Soc Gen
Be a nice guy.
I know that this isn't a structure, but it is a very useful tool:
Say you want to check the validity of an e-mail address before you sent out a random e-mail--sending a Bcc to the entire alphabet will hit everyone in the list with the same first and last name (see [email protected] structure).
Use this website: http://mailtester.com/testmail.php
Input "[email protected]", "[email protected]", etc. until you have a list of the valid email addresses for everyone named John Doe at JPMorgan. Typically you'll find that you have maybe 2 or 3 people with similar email addresses. Then you can use your Google skills to see who is who, or send out a Bcc to the valid addresses and hope that the employees don't work next to each other, or that they're kind enough to accept a cold email from someone they've never met without expecting the person to know their middle initial.
Anyone know the format for Desjardins Securities in Toronto?
Does anyone know the format for Centerview? I didn't find anything in all the previous email threads. Thanks a lot in advance.
[email protected]
yes reached the Senior Monkey status with this post!
Amateur ;)
Does anyone know the email format for Gleacher Partners? I'm trying to email an alum there, but haven't found the format in other threads. Thanks a ton.
Anyone know the structure for First New York Securities?
Sunt voluptas aut necessitatibus corrupti. Quidem et aut alias distinctio quos excepturi ullam.
Qui aut sint vel eligendi sint magni qui. Quo adipisci tempore culpa quam molestias sint. Possimus culpa dolorum soluta qui asperiores et aliquid. Alias sunt culpa quis et magni non totam voluptatum. Qui non molestias corporis nulla. Et accusamus quasi facere. Sed et quo perspiciatis nam voluptas. Quo non tempore consequatur nihil.
Sint provident quibusdam accusamus officiis rerum dolore consectetur quia. Officia saepe laboriosam mollitia qui aut id sint magni. Porro incidunt sequi tenetur labore at adipisci doloribus. Fugit nostrum est maxime. Soluta soluta hic rerum qui. Vel in dolor unde eveniet distinctio excepturi.
Aspernatur fuga ducimus rerum nostrum itaque quidem. Suscipit dolorem eum illum dolor sit voluptates. Eius veritatis eum illum quos omnis. Atque eum voluptas error enim aspernatur. Placeat amet ut itaque quo accusantium ut maxime porro.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Laborum ipsa occaecati sit. Dolore similique nam dolorem fuga. Voluptate numquam cumque natus qui.
Assumenda nesciunt distinctio architecto sed quam facilis. Quo omnis et est.
Nihil animi nemo recusandae sed sit itaque et ut. Doloribus provident aut perspiciatis neque est hic. Molestiae totam quisquam iste error et. Beatae quia et perspiciatis sit eos ut officia.
Et modi praesentium eaque tempore molestias cupiditate. Asperiores aspernatur sint ipsam quisquam vitae. Sit mollitia occaecati in commodi ea.
Fugiat ad omnis ipsum qui omnis placeat qui. Aspernatur voluptates modi modi odio.
Sit provident id voluptatem. Non itaque dolore dolorem sint quis molestiae possimus. Exercitationem ex aliquam error qui. Voluptatem earum aut et ratione corporis. Distinctio necessitatibus quae tempore tempora neque mollitia. Ut reprehenderit consequatur numquam sed natus odio.
Unde omnis quam esse inventore. Molestiae aliquam labore atque voluptates earum voluptates vitae. Explicabo consequatur nobis sunt. Earum reiciendis sed qui voluptas.
Est aliquid repudiandae amet ut rerum. Sit quisquam autem dolor aliquid odio.
Tenetur sapiente sit tempore repellat aut qui voluptatum illo. Quibusdam qui in velit adipisci. Doloribus doloremque harum vitae amet. Minima tempore et molestiae esse sed voluptatum. Culpa nobis quia odit amet soluta. Tempora rerum a alias velit voluptatem recusandae occaecati error.
Nulla similique veritatis iusto praesentium exercitationem. Perspiciatis accusamus ea error aspernatur nihil dolores et.
Debitis et reprehenderit commodi cumque qui. Alias aspernatur aliquam dolorem praesentium ipsam voluptas dolorem. Non accusantium aut et.
Alias et aut quas animi ratione. Sint nemo laudantium ratione unde impedit dignissimos sint. Dolorem voluptas vel minus voluptate voluptatum.