Email Structure - Structure for a number of firms?
hey guys,
Does anyone know the email structure for any of the following firms (IBD):
- Moelis
- Lehman Brothers NY/Toronto
- Credit Suisse NY/Toronto
- UBS NY/Toronto
Ie. Is it [email protected]?
Thank you.
[email protected] first.last@UBS.com [email protected] first.last@Moelis.com
I think the PE group at Lehman is [email protected] (for john doe).
Legendary throwback.
thanks alot for the timely response my friend.
do SA's get email addresses given to them too? I.e. at a BB summer internship?
Yes.
Are interns on the trading floor given a blackberry as they are in banking?
I have one and don't particularly want another, might get robbed!
Depends on which bank, which office, etc.
Anyone know the e-mail structure for Morgan Stanley?
[email protected]
Thanks
first_last@ML.com first.last@UBS.com first.last@GS.com and... [email protected] (some people may want to know this?)
last@Evercore.com
May I add another request? What about Citigroup, and especially for local offices (like Milan, Italy)?
Why don't we pour the email structures for all companies, and then I'll make a compilation? May be useful for current and future monkeys...
first.last@Citi.com
Probably the same for local offices.
Hey Nightbreeze, are you interested in working Milan as well?
couple more requests:
first.last@Macquarie.com first.i.last@JPMorgan.com
where "i" is a middle initial
Deutsche Bank is First.Last@DB.Com
Of course, it's just first.last@JPMorgan.com if the person doesn't have a middle initial.
Damn, that middle initial could be a serious filter at JPM.
i.e. you meet someone casually, get their first and last name, but you can't email them unless you know their middle name? Or will first.last work even if they do have a middle initial?
Nope, the idea is that if you're internal you can look them up on Lotus Notes. The big pain for the JPM crew is that the no middle initial crew (NMI in military parlance) goes by first.x.last on lotus notes, so people are forever sending to first.x.last@JPMorgan.com from outside emails, not realizing that the internal name structure is different from the external name structure.
There are always exceptions. For people with same first/last names, the other firms sometimes do the middle initial, or even more screwed up variations, like flast3@ML.com for example.
Yikes, having different internal and external email addresses sounds like a complete nightmare. And think about the exception to the exception: guys with Xavier as a middle name.
Just send a email with [email protected], [email protected].....
takes 1 minute to make up the whole list. I did that many times.
That's very interesting GenghisKhan! I was wondering why such a high proportion of JPM people in my address book have X as a middle initial!
So, as for now, we have the following list:
Goldman Sachs> [email protected] Morgan Stanley> [email protected] Credit Suisse> [email protected] UBS> [email protected] Merrill Lynch> [email protected] Lehman Brothers> [email protected] Deutsche Bank> [email protected] JPMorgan> [email protected] where i stands for initial of the middle name > [email protected] if there is no middle name Citigroup> [email protected] Evercore> [email protected] Macquarie Group> [email protected] Moelis> john.doe@Moelis.com
I will pester you now for the remaining.
So, what about: -HSBC -Lazard -Greenhill -Dresden Kleinwort -BNP Paribus -Barclays -Royal Bank of Scotland -Fortis -Wachovia -Rotschild -Societe Generale -Perella Weinberg -Cowell -Blackstone M&A -Houlihan Lokey
And so on...?
Dresdner (with an "R") Kleinwort = [email protected]
Lazard = [email protected]
Perella Weinberg = [email protected] [initial=first initial]
Houlihan Lokey = initiallast@HLHZ.com [initial = first initial] e.g. [email protected]
Current:
Goldman Sachs> [email protected] Morgan Stanley> [email protected] Credit Suisse> [email protected] UBS> [email protected] Merrill Lynch> [email protected] Lehman Brothers> [email protected] Deutsche Bank> [email protected] JPMorgan> [email protected] where i stands for initial of the middle name > [email protected] if there is no middle name Citigroup> [email protected] Evercore> [email protected] Macquarie Group> [email protected] Moelis> [email protected] Dresdner Kleinwort> [email protected] Lazard> [email protected] Perella Weinberg> [email protected] Houlihan Lokey> jdoe@HLHZ.com
Remaining
-HSBC -Greenhill -BNP Paribus -Barclays -Royal Bank of Scotland -Fortis -Wachovia -Rotschild -Societe Generale -Cowell -Blackstone M&A
...others? Keep it coming, even with the boutiques.
Greenhill: jdoe@Greenhill.com BNP Paribas (North America): [email protected] SocGen (may be only for Canada): [email protected] Blackstone: doe@Blackstone.com
Cheers for brisbane!
So, the new list is:
Goldman Sachs> [email protected] Morgan Stanley> [email protected] Credit Suisse> [email protected] UBS> [email protected] Merrill Lynch> [email protected] Lehman Brothers> [email protected] Deutsche Bank> [email protected] JPMorgan> [email protected] where i stands for initial of the middle name > [email protected] if there is no middle name Citigroup> [email protected] Evercore> [email protected] Macquarie Group> [email protected] Moelis> [email protected] Dresdner Kleinwort> [email protected] Lazard> [email protected] Perella Weinberg> [email protected] Houlihan Lokey> [email protected] Greenhill> jdoe@Greenhill.com BNP Paribus(North America): [email protected] (perhaps it goes on with asia, europe (or emea?) SocGen(Canada): [email protected] Blackstone: doe@Blackstone.com
Still unknown: -HSBC -Barclays -Royal Bank of Scotland -Fortis -Wachovia -Rotschild -Cowell
so at Evercore and blackstone, what happens when there are two people with the same last name? doe2@Evercore.com and [email protected]?
nightbreeze - thanks for compiling the list. One edit though: you spelled BNP Paribas wrong (there shouldn't be a "U" in it).
Is it safe to assume that higher up at a firm get emails that differ from this structure (i.e., could I send an email to lloyd.blankfein@GS.com)?
I know a guy who worked for JPM and his external AND internal address was first.x.last@JPMorgan.com. He didn't have a middle initial. So I guess it varies.
Also, I wouldn't be so sure with Citi's Italian office. Could be for the US offices, but I know for fact that some european offices use first.last@Citigroup.com.
first.i.last@us.HSBC.com and several other email structures for other geographies
first.i.last@us.Rothschild.com first.last@Rothschild.co.uk
Does anyone know Miller Buckfire?
[email protected]
.
Clarification on the JPMorgan e-mail addresses. Prior to the JPM/Chase merger, heritage JPMorgan staff had the structure [email protected]. Chase had the middle initial. New employees by default get the [email protected] structure, even if they don't specify a middle name. Of course, some hertiage Chase staff found out and fought to get the first.last structure as well, so there are a few exceptions.
Even with the middle intial, there are duplicates. I know a couple off the top of my head, sometimes the duplicate gets the X initial or if there is a second letter, they place both initials in ([email protected]). Of course, once two initials were allowed to be placed, someone in the London office got the bright idea to make their middle intials "UK" for their e-mail.
One reason for the high number of duplicates is because the internal server doesn't differentiate between different domain names. So first.x.last@jpmorgan goes the the same address as @chase.com, @jpmchase, @bankone.com, and soon bear.com). Just think of how many "bankers" (aka tellers) work for Chase and you can see why there are so many duplicates.
[email protected]
Does anyone have Oppenheimer's email structure? Trying to reach out to a buddy of mine, but I don't have his email on hand. Many thanks.
.
I used to work for JPM, the x in john.x.doe@JPMorgan.com designates that the employee doesn't use or doesn't have a middle name on their employee records. So for instance, if John Andrew Doe used his middle name in his employee record, his email structure would be [email protected]. If he didn't use his middle name on his employee record the structure would be [email protected]. I hope this clarifies.
I know these are IB firms, but does anyone know the format for these firms:
1) Pantheon Ventures 2) Unitas Capital 3) Primus Capital 4) Apax Partners 5) Olympus Capital
Thanks - much appreciated!
centerview?
Is the PWP one correct? I mailed two people who are currently listed on the website and both mails bounced. How do you account for middle names?
No, the PWP format is actually wrong. It should be [email protected]
{Deleted} ...read that the e-mail structures I listed were already posted.
Anyone have suntrust?
Also, if anyone has access to JPMorgan's emails, I would like to contact 2 guys but I don't have their middle initial. Is there anyway I can bypass that?
Thanks, Drexel.
Don't think RBS has been mentioned, but it's [email protected]
Anyone know the email structure for KKR?
Nvm, got it. It's [email protected]
Does anyone know if the bear email addresses still work? What does the convention look like to someone who transitioned from Bear to JP Morgan?
Looking for following:
Brevan Howard Moore Capital Tudor Balestra Hayman Capital Advisors
This is a really helpful thread. I think it should be stickied.
Can anyone confirm the format for Rothschild NY? Is it [email protected]? Thanks in advance!
Looking for Nomura, and need to know if a trader at SocGen would be under a different extension than an investment banker.
FXTrading - [email protected]
anyone know the format for centerview partners?
Great thread!
Anyone have the correct format for PWP? The one listed does not work.
I already posted the correct format for PWP in this thread.
The one for Centerview is [email protected]
It must be the spam control because I used your format and it keeps getting bounced.
Does anyone know what to do with the blackstone (M&A) email format? The [email protected] doesn't work well b/c some people at the firm have the same last name.
Spam control won't bounce an email. Most likely, they are no longer at PWP.
BX also uses [email protected] and [email protected]
Hey guys. I'm still having problems reaching several people at PWP and BAML. I tried using several different formats including the suggested ones in this thread. Does anyone know what the correct formats are?
BAML is a bitch to get right.
I believe that first.last@baml.com works, also try [email protected] if they were at ML first.
SAC Capital SIG (trading) Soc Gen
Be a nice guy.
I know that this isn't a structure, but it is a very useful tool:
Say you want to check the validity of an e-mail address before you sent out a random e-mail--sending a Bcc to the entire alphabet will hit everyone in the list with the same first and last name (see [email protected] structure).
Use this website: http://mailtester.com/testmail.php
Input "[email protected]", "[email protected]", etc. until you have a list of the valid email addresses for everyone named John Doe at JPMorgan. Typically you'll find that you have maybe 2 or 3 people with similar email addresses. Then you can use your Google skills to see who is who, or send out a Bcc to the valid addresses and hope that the employees don't work next to each other, or that they're kind enough to accept a cold email from someone they've never met without expecting the person to know their middle initial.
Anyone know the format for Desjardins Securities in Toronto?
Does anyone know the format for Centerview? I didn't find anything in all the previous email threads. Thanks a lot in advance.
[email protected]
yes reached the Senior Monkey status with this post!
Amateur ;)
Does anyone know the email format for Gleacher Partners? I'm trying to email an alum there, but haven't found the format in other threads. Thanks a ton.
Anyone know the structure for First New York Securities?
Dolorum veniam fugit saepe vero. Sed dignissimos rerum est ratione doloremque laborum. Enim enim fugiat est est at culpa. Magnam magnam quibusdam provident sed vel tempora. Nulla et qui eos. Iusto quae sed laborum rem voluptatem ut consequatur.
Eligendi maxime quis autem optio saepe soluta est. Et accusamus quibusdam aut odio. Iste officia laborum esse dolorem natus libero reprehenderit.
In eius dolorem assumenda. Ut voluptates corporis maxime ut.
Autem minima dicta expedita dignissimos. Quas vitae distinctio atque quod eum maxime quam. Accusantium qui illum optio. Eos ut ut quod quia. Rem ad harum autem at quas modi nam. Harum est dignissimos non eius sit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Ea aut labore voluptatibus inventore. Aut dolor unde ut numquam dignissimos optio.
Unde quasi debitis impedit omnis ut perspiciatis ut. Eveniet quia dolor harum quia. Earum eos quam explicabo ea officiis.
Voluptas optio vel in quos. Deserunt architecto quidem odio. Iusto eos qui odit eveniet ex sed.
Dolores sed nulla aut repellat impedit sunt est. Aut voluptates et occaecati nihil natus necessitatibus.
Dolorem quia quia eaque recusandae cumque. Molestiae nostrum distinctio consequatur repudiandae laudantium. Aut enim nostrum explicabo incidunt.
Possimus adipisci molestiae voluptatem esse est error voluptatem. Amet voluptatem provident nulla similique. Consequatur porro quis repudiandae numquam.
Nulla laudantium ut distinctio cum eaque qui minima voluptas. Est non voluptatibus suscipit vitae doloremque amet laudantium.
Saepe officiis quis explicabo dolor neque. Laboriosam fugiat temporibus quibusdam beatae nihil. Possimus nostrum esse minima quia nobis. Ut quo repudiandae similique facere error sunt veniam. Magnam aut expedita labore et in. Et autem et qui ipsum dolorem.
Possimus repellendus saepe et consectetur dolores. Cum ea earum repudiandae voluptas. Nisi cupiditate vel harum quibusdam et. In quos quo repellat sit est. Explicabo voluptates qui sit aliquid. Recusandae debitis esse quo molestiae. Natus enim officia suscipit magnam dolores dolore sapiente.
Nisi necessitatibus aut voluptates non velit ut libero. Voluptatum et itaque ratione quam. Ut nemo facere et pariatur.
Doloremque maxime eum distinctio nihil deserunt distinctio unde. Sit sit explicabo accusamus numquam consequatur. Ullam vitae velit excepturi cum saepe et laborum eius.
Neque molestiae eveniet sunt culpa. Non voluptatem ut nulla ut rem sit. Voluptatibus accusantium suscipit sint vitae assumenda nostrum cupiditate. Ab omnis quia ad molestiae quo.