etf closing price at a 5% discount to NAV?

i was recently reading this article that says LQD closing price on March 11/12 was at a 5% discount to the NAV. i mean intuitively how is this possible? why don’t someone just do an arbitrage trading and make 5% profit? is it because of a high bid/ask spread so that u can’t trade at a favorable price?

here’s a quote from the article:
Consider the iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD), the largest and most liquid U.S.-listed ETF of its type. On March 11 and March 12, LQD closed at prices that were roughly 5% below its NAV. A look under the hood shows why: most LQD constituents traded infrequently and market sentiment was not fully embedded in individual bond prices. On March 12, for example, LQD changed hands almost 90,000 times on exchange, while its top five holdings traded an average of only 37 times apiece.

link:
https://www.ishares.com/us/insights/etf-trends/co…

 
Most Helpful

No, NAV is a reflection of market price.

How do you value a bond that hasnt traded, and has no bids? You use a model. And that model is probably not fully reflecting the risk off mentality and the need for liquidity in this market. The price your model spits out for the bond will almost certainly be nowhere close to where you could actually sell it in the market.

So NAVs are wrong, the price of the ETF (assuming it is well run and fairly liquid) is a better reflection of the actual value of the bonds in the market, at that particular time.

 

Consequatur velit repellendus occaecati ut beatae. Nisi similique eum dignissimos asperiores ipsa voluptas eligendi ipsam.

Quo doloribus sunt dolores natus. Sed quas ut eum est. Sed vitae magnam mollitia iste exercitationem nisi odit. Eaque est et suscipit provident atque enim eaque omnis.

Impedit explicabo enim ut sed omnis beatae quia. Voluptas dolores ipsam iste nisi quas non commodi sit. Expedita fuga impedit accusamus ipsum quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”