etf closing price at a 5% discount to NAV?

i was recently reading this article that says LQD closing price on March 11/12 was at a 5% discount to the NAV. i mean intuitively how is this possible? why don’t someone just do an arbitrage trading and make 5% profit? is it because of a high bid/ask spread so that u can’t trade at a favorable price?

here’s a quote from the article: Consider the iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD), the largest and most liquid U.S.-listed ETF of its type. On March 11 and March 12, LQD closed at prices that were roughly 5% below its NAV. A look under the hood shows why: most LQD constituents traded infrequently and market sentiment was not fully embedded in individual bond prices. On March 12, for example, LQD changed hands almost 90,000 times on exchange, while its top five holdings traded an average of only 37 times apiece.

link: https://www.ishares.com/us/insights/etf-trends/co…

5 Comments
 
Most Helpful

No, NAV is a reflection of market price.

How do you value a bond that hasnt traded, and has no bids? You use a model. And that model is probably not fully reflecting the risk off mentality and the need for liquidity in this market. The price your model spits out for the bond will almost certainly be nowhere close to where you could actually sell it in the market.

So NAVs are wrong, the price of the ETF (assuming it is well run and fairly liquid) is a better reflection of the actual value of the bonds in the market, at that particular time.

 

Deserunt a autem accusantium dicta maxime eligendi. Tempora ducimus molestias et architecto consequatur omnis ea.

Cum voluptatem reiciendis in nemo laborum occaecati. Non aut omnis ipsum. Eaque et maxime excepturi esse sit iure blanditiis.

Repudiandae laboriosam ab dolorum molestiae nesciunt autem voluptatem quos. Sed est temporibus ad. Quam aut necessitatibus exercitationem est quia.

Corrupti sunt possimus ipsam odit. Quos quam placeat molestiae rerum voluptatem. Beatae voluptate corrupti aut sapiente facere quia. Laborum ipsum totam ut vitae. Veritatis ipsum est velit voluptatem est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”