Google partners with Goldman Sachs in automating Investment Banking

Investment Banking has been considered an area in finance that is less vulnerable to automation, compared to others such as Trading. This no longer seems to be the case as Google is seeking to use API's to automate vast amounts of work that are traditionally done by Investment Bankers.

My thoughts: Banking is a practice that will always be built on relationships, especially at the higher level. Automation will probably never replace this even at very advanced stages. However, that isn't all that a banker does. And if the routine grunt work that analysts usually have to do can be done by AI, there will simply be less demand for Investment Bankers as a larger percentage of the overall work done by a banker is instead done by AI.

I think it will be a relatively short period of time (or at least sooner than we think) that the work of two analyst level bankers can now be done by one with the help of automation, and as they get smarter and smarter, maybe 4 or 5 to one. Seniors can then be focused on the networking, relationships, etc.

The article

WSO Elite Modeling Package

  • 6 courses to mastery: Excel, Financial Statement, LBO, M&A, Valuation and DCF
  • Elite instructors from top BB investment banks and private equity megafunds
  • Includes Company DB + Video Library Access (1 year)

Comments (54)

Best Response
Apr 6, 2017 - 5:15pm

Automation won't replace Investment Bankers, it'll just make their jobs easier. You can't replace the relationship-driven part of the industry and neither can you replace the decision making abilities of bankers.

Honestly though, as an investor, would you put your capital into a company that just sent you a swarm of confusing automated valuation data or would you give it to the guys who sent you the exact same data, personally flew to your city, explained exactly why the company is a good investment tailored to YOUR needs, and then took you out for drinks/dinner afterward?

Apr 7, 2017 - 2:37pm

There is already one analyst per deal and putting the same analyst on even more deals would put their brains way beyond capacity. I am hoping hours will reduce even if this means wages stagnate a bit.

Be excellent to each other, and party on, dudes.
Apr 8, 2017 - 9:45pm

Just to play devil's advocate: I would agree with you, but what if said "company that just sent you a swarm of confusing, automated valuation data" was much cheaper because of that automation? I think this changes things somewhat. I don't think you'll ever have confusing and unverified data ever going out to a client. This is IB afterall. But you may have a lot of the upfront work automated, thus reducing the burden on the juniors. Just my 2 cents.

  • 1
Apr 9, 2017 - 2:55am
CHECK6:

Automation won't replace Investment Bankers, it'll just make their jobs easier. You can't replace the relationship-driven part of the industry and neither can you replace the decision making abilities of bankers.

Honestly though, as an investor, would you put your capital into a company that just sent you a swarm of confusing automated valuation data or would you give it to the guys who sent you the exact same data, personally flew to your city, explained exactly why the company is a good investment tailored to YOUR needs, and then took you out for drinks/dinner afterward?

Automation won't replace bankers but artificial intelligence and machine learning can. In the near future, 5-10 years, computers/AI/Tech/Automation can very easily perform many of the tasks that bankers perform. You say would you rather.... Well depending on deal size the price tag difference between your two methods could be staggering. Companies will be quick to adopt automation. What happens with an ER shop using AI/BI/machine learning produce valuation numbers on the fly from various perspectives. Large companies would ne able to freely purchase that data from multiple sources. Every client knows they are paying for the dinner and drinks in the long run.

My only point is, don't think you're irreplaceable because you're not. Yes relationships will matter but the M&A workforce could easily see 20-50% reductions in size due to technological advancements in AI and machine learning. Obviously this thread is about automation but wanted to look past automation. (Which is Stone Age compared to machine learning)

Learn More

300+ video lessons across 6 modeling courses taught by elite practitioners at the top investment banks and private equity funds -- Excel Modeling -- Financial Statement Modeling -- M&A Modeling -- LBO Modeling -- DCF and Valuation Modeling -- ALL INCLUDED + 2 Huge Bonuses.

Learn more
Apr 6, 2017 - 5:23pm

I remember seeing CS models from India. The outsourcing/automation have been going on for years. What people fail to realize is that banking (IB/Corp/Commercial/etc) is about relationships. This is why what makes a good analyst doesn't make a good VP and why automation alone will not be the end of banking.

  • 5
Apr 7, 2017 - 5:36am

India - the place where everybody gets their shit from. Just make sure it isn't the Delhi Belly type. Sorry if you were eating something right now.
Honestly, it's much easier to outsource if you are in a BB. If you are in an EB preftige firm or a small boutique like Qatalyst, you'll end up doing most of the work yourself.

GoldenCinderblock: "I keep spending all my money on exotic fish so my armor sucks. Is it possible to romance multiple females? I got with the blue chick so far but I am also interested in the electronic chick and the face mask chick."
Apr 9, 2017 - 2:41am
TNA:

I remember seeing CS models from India. The outsourcing/automation have been going on for years. What people fail to realize is that banking (IB/Corp/Commercial/etc) is about relationships. This is why what makes a good analyst doesn't make a good VP and why automation alone will not be the end of banking.

I agree with you and Sil, but I think there will be a pretty significant reduction in the workforce even in M&A in the next 5-10 years. Relationship management will take a long time to follow but menial tasks will be quick.

Apr 6, 2017 - 5:31pm

The one interesting thing I am curious to see is the pace of cultural shift with increased automation. If investment banking becomes increasingly commoditized due to AI/automation, will that hurt the relationship aspect of the business? Might lead to there being less discernible difference between a historically shit bank and a historically great bank. I'm not a banker by any means but I could see this being a possibility.

Advertising used to be a relationship heavy business. It is much, much less so now that advertising placement and targeting is completely automated on the internet. Not sure if this is an analogous comparison but would be curious to hear a banker's thoughts.

Apr 6, 2017 - 6:37pm

Automation can do a lot and maybe it will trim the headcount a little, but I don't think it will eliminate the need for people completely. A lot of deals happen from relationships and experience so you can't automate that. You can automate excel but someone has to make the PPT just the way the MD likes it! :)

"I'm talking about liquid. Rich enough to have your own jet. Rich enough not to waste time. Fifty, a hundred million dollars, buddy. A player. Or nothing. " -GG
  • 1
Apr 6, 2017 - 9:23pm
the_gekko:

Automation can do a lot and maybe it will trim the headcount a little, but I don't think it will eliminate the need for people completely. A lot of deals happen from relationships and experience so you can't automate that. You can automate excel but someone has to make the PPT just the way the MD likes it! :)

False, sir...false. I've made powerpoint macros before so yeah. Hold on while I finish building out powerpoint Siri. Her arms and legs are made of VBA

Apr 7, 2017 - 6:01am

Hey, wanna join forces? I did the same thing!

GoldenCinderblock: "I keep spending all my money on exotic fish so my armor sucks. Is it possible to romance multiple females? I got with the blue chick so far but I am also interested in the electronic chick and the face mask chick."
Apr 6, 2017 - 10:05pm

Admittedly, when I first heard about automation in finance, I had a negative response but I have more a positive outlook now. Firstly, analysts (and senior bankers) will be able to focus on providing value such as by focusing on developing relationships, delivering valuable advice in grey areas, etc. instead of getting through "grunt work" which will be taken care of by software. Moreover, I think this will decrease the hours for junior bankers who spend most of their time doing grunt work. This will improve the quality of life for bankers (maybe traders too) and hopefully banks are shifting more away from "traditional" practices like demanding face time and more towards increasing efficiency, productivity, and being innovative. I think technology enhances bankers' ability to do these things. Finance is not going away anytime soon (I hope.... inb4 a communist revolution) and it's inevitable that innovation takes place - if you are afraid innovation, then you probably shouldn't be working in the field.

Apr 7, 2017 - 6:03am

Analysts don't provide value - they do the bitch work alone. When an analyst moves into an AO role, that's when they start building their connections. Till then, most people on the other side just tend to look at them as the workforce. I work in the other side and have rarely sat in meetings with analysts - although it would be unwise not to connect with them if given the opportunity.

GoldenCinderblock: "I keep spending all my money on exotic fish so my armor sucks. Is it possible to romance multiple females? I got with the blue chick so far but I am also interested in the electronic chick and the face mask chick."
Apr 8, 2017 - 4:44pm

THanks for your rant, I really appreciate the bold for emphasis....now back to your textbook,

twitter: @CorpFin_Guy
Apr 7, 2017 - 10:01am

Reads about IB for 2 hours on WSO

All diz shit can be done by AI, how do these finance bros not see the opportunity here!!!!!!!

Life's is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Apr 7, 2017 - 10:50am

I'm genuinely curious how one could automate investment banking. Company valuation and company and industry analysis is probably the most subjective job function I can conceive of.

Array

  • 1
Apr 7, 2017 - 8:47pm

By removing the subjectivity element and relying on large datasets for information.

Besides, these days, investment banking often runs on similar lines to a random number generator. It's just about getting the other side to agree to your "carefully-analysed and generated" number.

GoldenCinderblock: "I keep spending all my money on exotic fish so my armor sucks. Is it possible to romance multiple females? I got with the blue chick so far but I am also interested in the electronic chick and the face mask chick."
  • 2
Apr 8, 2017 - 12:22am
Frank Quattrone:

By removing the subjectivity element and relying on large datasets for information.

Besides, these days, investment banking often runs on similar lines to a random number generator. It's just about getting the other side to agree to your "carefully-analysed and generated" number.

I mean, maybe that works in some way in investment banking, I'll grant you that. That certainly wouldn't work in venture capital roles, however, where valuing an early stage company is so stupidly difficult that people have defaulted to convertible bonds. But even in investment banking, the "valuation" of an IPO is a balancing act between tangible numbers and salesmanship on the "roadshow" and then rewarding favored clients. Was Snapchat's IPO price, for example, purely numbers driven?

Array

  • 4
Apr 7, 2017 - 11:20am

Pretty much what everyone is saying: banking is a relationship driven business that requires expertise drawn from past deal experiences; analysts provide none of the above, only grunt work.

Conclusion: analyst tasks could be largely automated, reducing the need for a 20 man analyst class to perhaps 2? Thank christ i'm gonna be in and out before this happens.

Apr 7, 2017 - 1:57pm

Won't replace people, but will definitely reduce headcount in increasing numbers. Christ, is there any part of the financial industry that's growing? For a guy looking into hedge funds too, this is pretty shitty news

Apr 7, 2017 - 2:04pm

I think we have seen instances of this in a variety of other industries, and while jobs that exist today will be replaced to some degree through the use of automation, I also think it is safe to assume that this will create new job opportunities (i.e. more programmers with a finance focus). The other consistent result of automation has been significant innovation. IN the IB world, that may mean more flexible deal structures, easier access to capital, and bankers who are able to spend less time worrying about the model/pitch/CIM and more time focusing on winning new business.

Apr 7, 2017 - 2:46pm

I see this having a much bigger impact on Corporate driven M&A than banking IB head counts.

Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays

Life is hard, it's even harder when you're stupid - John Wayne

Apr 8, 2017 - 10:00pm

take it for what it is - google being smart. if you are going to build out some next level tech (ai, machine learning, general automation), ib processes and work serve as an ideal test for fleshing out the human aspects of some software (logic, prioritizing, consistency, consuming and interpreting raw data mixed with external communication, foreseeing what needs to be done to avoid a weekend of work....etc.).

Apr 9, 2017 - 10:58am

Google better build out a feature called let's "grease the wheel" because your Managing Director wants a specific EBIT/EV ratio.

Robert Clayton Dean: What is happening?
Brill: I blew up the building.
Robert Clayton Dean: Why?
Brill: Because you made a phone call.

  • 1
Apr 9, 2017 - 2:18pm

So the article mentions bringing about a single node for all the data collected across the firm and I think this presents important challenges to Goldman. While Marty Chavez is on point about the risk solutions POV about banking as a business, discretion and trust are equally important aspects too.

I think that's a dimension that definitely needs to be addressed by the article and thought about when Goldman builds out this system.

Apr 10, 2017 - 8:26am

Simple solution - learn to code. Computers can't program themselves, at least not yet.

For everyone who thinks that coding is hard and obscure and should be left for computer science majors- my bet is that within 15 years, programming will be a mandated part of the curriculum in most high schools and middle schools in developed countries. Programming is a tool, like math or language skills, and is becoming essential.

For what it's worth, learning advanced Excel is an OK gateway drug to introductory programming. The basic ideas aren't too different to what you already know.

Apr 10, 2017 - 9:40am
mbamfinquestions:

Simple solution - learn to code. Computers can't program themselves, at least not yet.

For everyone who thinks that coding is hard and obscure and should be left for computer science majors- my bet is that within 15 years, programming will be a mandated part of the curriculum in most high schools and middle schools in developed countries. Programming is a tool, like math or language skills, and is becoming essential.

For what it's worth, learning advanced Excel is an OK gateway drug to introductory programming. The basic ideas aren't too different to what you already know.

"Learning to code" in school will bring your skill set to the level of usefulness of the English skills of Chinese students--you could possibly get by in a conversation, but your skills would be insufficient to deploy professionally.

Array

  • 4
Apr 11, 2017 - 7:16am

You don't have to be a specialist in it. You just have to be able to use it as a tool.

There's a big difference between optimizing algorithms, knowing about trees, for loops and if statements, and having no idea of how code is structured. Many jobs outside of computer science currently require little above the latter, but basic knowledge and awareness will be essential in a few years.

Apr 15, 2017 - 1:38am

One of my mentors was Blankfein's assistant for two years after doing his IBD stint. In talking to him, he also made the point that especially at Goldman watch how the power structure plays out in periods of transition because it signals where revenue expectations are soon trending. Marty Chavez becoming CFO is the next evolution within the firm since the J Aron contingent ascended in the mid-90s. Don't think for a second they don't expect to update the nature of the client interaction for the 21st century.

Apr 15, 2017 - 6:22am

Many of you are thinking about this the wrong way.

I'm old enough to have worked for bankers who were around when computers / spreadsheets became prevalent. The view then in the early 1980s was that spreadsheets which at the time were a quantum leap in innovation and productivity (far more so than any automation or machine learning because they cut at the very heart of the job) would replace analysts and associates and eventually obviate the need for bankers as companies could do their own analysis themselves. Guess what - since then, there are probably 20x the number of front office bankers in NY and the pace of deal making has increased accoridngly. Rather than reduce the need for bankers it allowed bankers to become more productive and do more deals. I don't doubt that technology will be transformative in the future, but expect it to increase the pace of activity.

Believe me, if we had machine learning that made my analysts more productive , I wouldn't reduce the analysts. I would be scaling my business and doing more transactions. And the corporate executives and sponsors I work with would be doing the same.

Apr 15, 2017 - 8:30am

I don't think that's quite the case. In fact quite the opposite should be expected to happen. I had a lengthy conversation with him over drinks about this issue and where he thought finance in general was heading long-term and I think it worth sharing with whomever finds it interesting.

The process of deal flow occurs independently of the process to create any attendant, tangible product. Bankers did more deals because, simply, there was a tsunami of capital from the baby-boom generation. Consumption slimmed and net assets soared right around the time of Windows 97.

Taken to its conclusion, with this generation retiring and Europe in a demographic free fall (avg birthrate far below replacement), from back of the envelope math it follows this deal flow "pie" will only get smaller - a an order of magnitude smaller - in the next 30+ years. So, if you can't grow your revenues any longer in existing business lines (unless at the margin), you point your ammunition at a different target on the income statement.

All I'm saying is regardless of what your view is on these things, internally a client service model driven by technology is what GS believes is the future value proposition of the firm: that you aren't getting just the expertise and experience of each vertical, but the collective intelligence of the entire company. Ultimately, at the end of the day, you'll see that a lot of the value-add in financial services really wasn't value-add at all...

Anyway, I think this is a good parallel - excerpt from NYT on HBS and disruption: "Talking about disruption at HBS and the education field in general, Mr. Ortalo-Magné spins out the possibilities of disruption even further. "How many calculus professors do we need in the world?" he asked. "Maybe it's nine. My colleague says it's four. One to teach in English, one in French, one in Chinese, and one in the farm system in case one dies."

Apr 17, 2017 - 10:25am

Qui at nostrum praesentium fugiat cupiditate. Voluptas molestias omnis magni expedita assumenda quibusdam velit. Ipsam dolores odit eligendi.

Quas officiis blanditiis est. Sed quo non repellendus omnis et.

Array

May 8, 2017 - 1:11pm

Soluta quae quae consectetur quisquam quae. Laboriosam minus odio dolor nostrum tempore aspernatur quia. Ipsam blanditiis consectetur suscipit blanditiis quia vitae. Rerum aspernatur sint aut vel beatae. Distinctio officia pariatur explicabo quibusdam. Totam voluptatem ut sunt iste est in.

Nisi quibusdam non tempore quaerat autem. Ab eum rerum nam. Dolore vel voluptatum alias a iusto ut qui. Rem officiis sed accusantium est ad sit. Omnis quisquam necessitatibus labore aliquid quas qui.

Don´t say this in a banking interview: Which superhero would you be and why? I want to be like Robin Hood, stealing from the rich and giving to the poor - me.
  • Intern in IB-M&A
Sep 6, 2020 - 9:28pm

Consequatur quam dolor non quam sint voluptas maxime. Quis molestiae consequatur doloremque nisi omnis ut aut. Temporibus error excepturi corporis officia sapiente. Minus ratione modi aut nihil repellat repellat.

Incidunt aut et similique occaecati. Praesentium ipsam molestiae reprehenderit odit.

Mollitia minus esse maxime non ab consequatur sint. Sapiente asperiores sed minus sed non saepe hic. Aut earum aliquid dicta expedita vel. Esse unde et est perferendis nisi officiis.

Iusto non distinctio neque. Aut nesciunt est molestias et quod. Libero libero dolor ad vel quo. Ratione nobis voluptatibus officiis in sapiente. Qui non omnis laboriosam non explicabo. Sunt amet dolores praesentium accusantium. Et aspernatur aut perferendis autem modi occaecati libero.

Start Discussion

Total Avg Compensation

November 2021 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (10) $853
  • Vice President (40) $360
  • Associates (234) $234
  • 2nd Year Analyst (144) $156
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (34) $154
  • Intern/Summer Associate (107) $146
  • 1st Year Analyst (513) $136
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (393) $83