HL FAS Group - Any thoughts on work, lifestyle, comp, exit opps?

Hi everyone,
Hope you can help answer some of my questions about FAS.

I know HL FAS does tons of fairness, solvency opinion work along with goodwill impairment, PPA and it isn't as respected as Corp Fin and Restructuring. But, I'm wondering if there is a way to get any exposure to deals/M&A within FAS. Are there opportunities to work across teams that deal more with M&A type work?

How difficult is it for an analyst in FAS to switch to their corp fin group?
How is the compensation in terms of salary and year-end bonus?
What are some of the exit opportunities? Would I have to switch to M&A before making it to a decent PE?
Top 10 B-School opportunities from FAS?
There is also much talk about client interaction at the junior level relative to other boutique/middle market banks; how much client interaction is there at the analyst level for FAS?

Thanks!!!!!

26 Comments
 

Not sure if I can be the most helpful, but I did have a superday at Houlihan FAS this past fall. After talking to the guys there, its seems distinctly different from their Corp. Fin. group with little/no exposure and not a realistic chance of moving over. However, if I had to venture a guess, I would say that the skills/name would be enough to be able to transfer to a boutique/MM IB after a year or two.

My honest opinion of the group was that it was sort of a B-team within HL. Not to say it wouldn't be a solid starting point, but the majority of people there were from Big 4 audit and mediocre schools--Again, not trying to sound negative, just not the culture your used to seeing in IB. From the research I did the base salary was the same ($10k+$70K) with a smaller bonus(...Maybe $10k?).

If this is for a SA, I think it would be a great alternative for somebody looking to leverage it into a FT IB offer. If FT, still a good name and similar skills to IB. Wish I could be more helpful, and my info is somewhat anecdotal, but that's all I know about the group.

 

Not as tough to get into as M&A or RX so not highly regarded at the analyst level among jobs in finance. This shouldn't matter that much as some of the most respected people in high finance had the most unconventional and unique paths.

They are also one of the market leaders in that space along with one or two other valuation shops. So you will actually build a great skill set there which is relevant to pretty much every job in finance. I'd actually argue that you'll become better in excel / modeling than most IB analysts just because you're job is to value different securities. If you wanted to, you'd easily be able to move into IB as long as you don't stay in valuation too long.

 
  1. I would not categorize it as traditional IB; more valuation work, but very well respected
  2. Middle market PE, Business Development, Corp Fin
  3. Depends on location; figure 75 - 85 hrs on average
  4. Fairness Opinions, PPAs, Solvency, Goodwill impairment, etc.
  5. Of the three divisions at HLHZ, it is the least profitable. As such, Comp is traditionally lower than Restructuring and Corp Fin. I'm not 100% on actuals though.
 

do you think there would be potential to lateral to M&A? also, i would imagine, moving to maybe l/s equity or something like this would be possible, since you are looking at companies very closely on a stand-alone basis; is this fair? any more color would be great; thanks so far

 

i interviewed with all three groups and my impression of FAS is that it's really focused on what it does, which is fairness opinion. Corp fins and restructuring do their own valuations. i feel like the three groups do not really interact with each other and i would say it depends on what you want, FAS will definitely give you great experience in valuation and modelling, but corp fin and restructuring seem to focus more on execution. But again, this is my IMPRESSION from the interviews. I never worked with them so I do not know for sure...

 

how would you prep for this interview?

i've done banking up till now, but haven't had crazy amounts of modeling, so that said, what specifically should i focus on?

 

FAS is completely valuation-based. Also known as, fairness opinions. You may think that valuation-intensive work is desirable, but your options are severely limited coming out of FAS. The reason is that FAS analysts are not expected to cultivate relationships like "front office" bankers in M&A are expected to. There is an entire deal process that involves much more than mere valuation. Your skills coming out of M&A would include those that you would acquire in FAS, with the added perspective on what makes a deal attractive, how to deal with clients, how to sell a company, etc.

I don't personally know anyone in FAS, but many of my classmates dropped interviews with them when they discovered what kind of work they would be doing.

 
Best Response

^ The poster above has no idea what he is talking about.

First of all fairness opinions are infact issued by the sell-side investment bank, to convince the selling shareholders that the offer is indeed a fair price, so there is litigation risk here for the IB. Valuation firms do not issue fairness opinions on deal pricing because of the legal risk and conflicts of interest.

Occassionally, for HLTs, (levered) a valuation firm may issue a solvency opinion to show that post-deal the company will still be a solvent going-concern and not in severe risk of insolvency after closing. You see these types of reports in the LBO merger proxies and other leveraged recaps that could tilt the company into credit default.

The valuation firm issues fair value, or fair market value reports (depends if its for tax or GAAP) to aid the client in the purchase price allocation or a 1060 allocation if its on the tax side. The opening or post-merger balance sheet reflects the work of the valuation firm which is extremely important to the client because how you allocate goodwill, and do the step up can have substantial effects on EPS going forward, especially during a recession.

The skills, tools (CapIQ, etc.) utilized are exactly identical to those obtained in IB, or ER if not more because of the additional experience obtained in basis step ups for M&A tax - IRC 338's, 751's, etc. The client exposure is also great - in fact more so than analyst level IB, because you have to interview the client when making cash flow projections to re-value the business for financial reporting purposes.

A good amount of MD's and VP's i've met in IB/PE started out their careers in valuation groups of various TAS in the larger accounting firms. You get exposure to all facets of a company's capital structure and your exit opps are just as good as anyone in the M&A business.

The edge IB's have over valuation firms is the financing aspects of the deal. This is where valuation firms fall short, and the IB shines. IB's can quickly underwrite debt, equity, hybrids, syndicated loans - raising money for your deal - while distributing the financing risk to investors all over the world.

 

I thought HLHZ's financial advisory unit was included within their banking division; is this more like working for KPMG, or a similar firm? Sorry for sounding so clueless about this; I have already had banking experience, but only a year+'s worth so far, so that's all I really know. I am applying to HLHZ because it is a better firm. Anyone else that can provide more color on this, your help would be greatly appreciated.

 

Exit Opps from FAS are very different than from Corp. Fin. You don't get the same skill set in FAS or the same kind of exposure as you do in CF. This is not to say that you don't gain a ton of technical skills in FAS, it's just very tailored to what they do, fairness opinions. People hate on FAS senselessly, but it is definitely different from CF and will lead to different opps. I can't speak too specifically on what people do after FAS, unfortunately, but I am fairly certain that it's different from banking exit opps.

 

Est et aut ratione sed cum. Debitis cumque nam impedit ipsum et aut. Eaque quia minima mollitia non accusantium.

Labore nihil et corporis labore maiores sapiente impedit. Voluptate atque quam libero magnam qui dolorem dicta. Eum omnis asperiores ipsam quis facilis ut occaecati saepe. Ex quisquam placeat velit consequatur sed omnis.

 

Cum qui minus ut. Est enim labore et a. Suscipit voluptatem voluptatibus inventore et ducimus minima dolor eos. Corrupti non voluptatum dolor sunt impedit harum praesentium.

Totam et ipsa magnam quis provident sed. Dolorem asperiores harum praesentium quia voluptatem. Distinctio blanditiis tempore accusamus. Aut accusantium alias corporis magni molestiae enim. Molestiae omnis et veritatis maiores sit eos.

Quidem odit ratione quis voluptatibus. Quaerat qui quis debitis nam voluptatem. Et necessitatibus iste totam eius et.

Itaque et animi dicta. Voluptate occaecati totam est dolores aperiam iste. Ratione cumque quia ad suscipit. Labore in dolores ad magni est. Soluta eaque maiores quo delectus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”