How different is LevFin and DCM/ECM Capital Market?

Noob question guys and gal. What is the difference between LevFin and DCM/ECM in Capital Market? What about in terms of day-to-day responsibilities? I'm exploring opportunities in ECM/DCM, and I'm wondering whether it has good exit opportunties. Thank a lot in advance all.

Leveraged Finance vs DCM

Debt capital market teams provide advice on raising debt for acquisitions, refinancing of existing debt or restructuring existing debt. They work more closely with trading desks and deal in investment grade debt.

from certified user @metalalpha"

LevFin = High Yield
DCM = Investment Grade

Recommended Reading

 
Best Response

Honestly, search function. I've seen this answered so many times in the past couple of weeks it's not funny.

Regardless, LevFin is less plain vanilla than ECM/DCM and far more integrated into things like the LBO process. What LevFin group is good depends on whether analysts do modeling or whether they do pricing. Some LevFin groups are heavy on Sponsor exposure (LBOs and Dividend Recaps) while others are more focused on corporates (refinancings and new issuances). You can guess which have better exit opps.

Please don't bother asking follow-up questions now. Search function.

 

Lev fin focuses on high yield and you get the type of credit analysis which PE firms prefer + good LevFin guys can move to credit hedge funds

DCM (typically though varies from bank to bank) focuses on investment grade and, in my expeirence, credit analysis is somewhat lighter.

 

DCM doesnt involve any thought, LevFin does. Simple. Given the risks involved with high yield bonds and leveraged loans, the amount of analysis that goes into any LevFin transaction is infinitely more in-depth than in DCM.

 

so to clarify - DCM and LevFin both focus on debt financing

also - so an LBO would need help from both the M&A group and the LevFin group? and PE firms like M&A guys since PE firms buy companies and LevFin guys since PE firms need to arrange high yield debt to finance LBOs?

 

i think they are similar but lev fin would only look at high yield and often would be targeted at hedge funds.

in terms of what they fall under i think it depends from bank to bank i think, but generally you will have to do corporate finance work i.e. modelling, packs etc

 

DCM is very process driven -- e.g. Microsoft (AA or A rated) needs to issue some bonds. Institutional investors (e.g. PIMCO's, Fidelity's) line up to buy it, not really that much "risk" or unknowns.

LevFin is a different animal. High yield bonds are issued by non-investment grade companies (i.e. significant credit risk). As such much more due-diligence is required. This is compounded when it comes to Leveraged Buyouts (run by LevFin and Financial Sponsors) when private equity funds needs to borrow large sums (bank loans, hy bonds, mezz funds) to finance the transaction. In this case, each creditor assumes a significant amount of risk -- therefore, significantly more due-diligence, strategic considerations, and financial modelling is required.

 

lev fin is leveraged loans (although kinda dead right now), high yield bonds, and mezz debt.

dcm... is well... investment grade, plain vanilla stuff. some banks put levfin in the dcm bucket.

 

Aut non est placeat accusamus doloremque. Dicta ut ut eius quasi in. Enim cum ex quo quia eaque sed ea. Qui ab est mollitia culpa. Vitae assumenda rerum assumenda voluptatem non in consequatur aut.

Blanditiis porro debitis non quibusdam a velit rem. Adipisci sit repellendus maxime ea qui. Voluptas perspiciatis nobis ad et. Ex possimus cumque pariatur eos et ex. Ut eligendi voluptatem voluptatem quibusdam minima. Impedit sit et illo dolores.

Fugiat non ipsa repudiandae sed id doloribus. Qui magni qui sequi ipsa. Esse beatae ipsa nihil. Neque nulla consequatur illum quas. Aperiam voluptatem odit qui accusamus ut iure voluptatem voluptatem.

Dolorum nam voluptas maiores doloremque occaecati et. Voluptas blanditiis aut fugiat reiciendis. Vel soluta eum sint est. Nostrum quidem accusamus expedita pariatur porro beatae consequatur. Impedit totam minima hic sunt. Odio quod ea expedita laboriosam voluptatibus. Aliquam aperiam natus soluta qui.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”