35 Comments
 

One of my friends wanted to play football at yale and he needed a 3.6.....

But is UK really about lose to HYP

The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee WSO is not your personal search function.
 

I assume you mean H.S. GPA... if so, not so much the GPA, but you probably need to be at least top 20% of your class and get an 1150 your SAT (old SAT). I think the worst students on those teams probably match that description. There are plenty of 1400-1600 and top 5% kids, though.

 

Obviously you know nothing about sports...

The answer to your question would be, "depends on how good you are."

Obviously you can't be a complete dumb ass, but if Derrick Rose or any top HS recruit actually wanted to go to Harvard, trust me, they would FIND a way.

"Cut the burger into thirds, place it on the fries, roll one up homey..." - Epic Meal Time
 
vadremcObviously you know nothing about sports...

The answer to your question would be, "depends on how good you are."

Obviously you can't be a complete dumb ass, but if Derrick Rose or any top HS recruit actually wanted to go to Harvard, trust me, they would FIND a way.

This isn't true. Not when it comes to the Ivy leagues

The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee WSO is not your personal search function.
 
blackfinancier
vadremcObviously you know nothing about sports...

The answer to your question would be, "depends on how good you are."

Obviously you can't be a complete dumb ass, but if Derrick Rose or any top HS recruit actually wanted to go to Harvard, trust me, they would FIND a way.

This isn't true. Not when it comes to the Ivy leagues

Knew a kid at my high school who was looked at by an Ivy. Kid was a starter at 6'6". Team made it to the final four his senior year. Not an extremely large state but big enough. Kid had a 3.2 GPA. They wanted him to go to a prep school for a year and then transfer in for them after he raised his grades. All-state team. No Derrick Rose but a good player. It all depends on what the team needs are for that recruiting class and how you fit into that equation.

 
rufioloveIt's not KU, it's Kentucky (UK) big difference...

Thank you.

The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee WSO is not your personal search function.
 

I A) was a three sport athlete in HS so I know a little lol and B) yeah UK my bad

Ballfan: your one for one and they are close...kentucky's most likely gonna rape em in the 2nd though

 

I know a guy that played Hockey at Harvard back in the 80's and if you didn't know any better (and didn't see the giant ass Harvard ring he always throws in people's faces) you would think he was retarded.

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 
  1. the ivy league is 'relatively' selective with its players but there is no way derrick rose would have been accepted
  2. no real stud recruit would want to play for an academic school -- ugly girls, bad weather, the list goes on and on
 

please tell me you guys are watching Princeton v Kentucky and Princeton is LEADING 42-37

mmod.ncaa.com watch the game.

The answer to your question is 1) network 2) get involved 3) beef up your resume 4) repeat -happypantsmcgee WSO is not your personal search function.
 
Nobama88Not that its HYP, but knew a kid who went to Dartmouth for football. Had a 3.1 GPA in HS and a average SAT. Knew another kid that went to play football for Columbia, had a 3.3 and avg SAT.

Those are Ivies just the same.

 

I have a friend at Harvard who had 1200 and 3.0 from high school- he plays a sport..Interestingly enough he has a 3.5 at Harvard and never studies

 
KrugI have a friend at Harvard who had 1200 and 3.0 from high school- he plays a sport..Interestingly enough he has a 3.5 at Harvard and never studies
.....rocks for jocks
Get busy living
 
UFOinsider
KrugI have a friend at Harvard who had 1200 and 3.0 from high school- he plays a sport..Interestingly enough he has a 3.5 at Harvard and never studies
.....rocks for jocks

Hah, that explains how grade inflation is persistent even at H?

 

Ivy League football has something called the Academic Index.... a system of GPA/SAT bands that allocate admissions slots for football recruits.

Typically 30 recruits per year. The 30 slots are distributed in a way to statistically mirror the incoming freshman class academically (with a set deviation factor).

For HYP, they can't touch anyone below 3.0/1200 SAT. (and only get 2 spots at that level)

If you have 3.8/1550... much easier.

Most of the players fall somewhere in between: ~3.5/1350

********************************* “The American father is never seen in London. He passes his life entirely in Wall Street and communicates with his family once a month by means of a telegram in cipher.” - Oscar Wilde
 
Best Response
veritas14Ivy League football has something called the Academic Index.... a system of GPA/SAT bands that allocate admissions slots for football recruits.

Typically 30 recruits per year. The 30 slots are distributed in a way to statistically mirror the incoming freshman class academically (with a set deviation factor).

For HYP, they can't touch anyone below 3.0/1200 SAT. (and only get 2 spots at that level)

If you have 3.8/1550... much easier.

Most of the players fall somewhere in between: ~3.5/1350

Veritas is right on target. The lowest band is only two players per year. The rankings are dependent on a number of things: GPA, SAT 1, SAT 2, ACT, and Class Rank are the ones I can think of right now. If you were top 10% of your class and didn't completely bomb the standardized testing, you're in good shape as an athlete. Being more highly skilled will buy you more leniency, but not a complete free pass.

There are no scholarships, only "need-based financial aid"... they do teach the athletes a few minor tips and tricks, but nothing illegal (unfortunately).

 

As someone who went through the ivy recruiting process (although for lacrosse) the general rule of thumb is if you are good enough, it doesn't really matter. Usually a team breaks their recruits into different tranches based on how good they are and the athletes grades. So if you are good enough and have shitty grades (around a 3.0), you are placed in the C tranche and I'm assuming HPY get only a few a year of these for basketball. the rest of the team is made up of smart people who might or might not have gotten in without basketball but are very smart. The dude who made the shot for Princeton was a C tranche guy obviously

 

A girl in my graduating class got into Princeton a soccer scholarship with 1500 out of 2400. She was all state.

I am not cocky, I am confident, and when you tell me I am the best it is a compliment. -Styles P
 
eokpar02A girl in my graduating class got into Princeton a soccer scholarship with 1500 out of 2400. She was all state.

Liar. Ivy League schools do not give athletic scholarships.

 

Harvard has the highest standard of the 3 schools (HYP) in terms of GPA and test scores for athlete recruitment. If you don't pass the minimum threshold for most teams of 700 on the SAT I's and have a very high GPA, you're probably not going to get looked at. Most kids are in the 2100-2200 range, but there are tons of 2300+ kids as well. The lower you go down the ivies, the less of an academic standard they have. It also depends on your sport. If you play a sport like basketball, lax, hockey or baseball, your academic standards for admission are much lower than people on say the track, swimming, and tennis teams. This is well known. But the Academic Index allows for teams to take the stud athletes with slightly lower test scores, etc while accepting kids with lights out scores and are still top level varsity players, but will most likely be bench warmers.

 
sdgoHarvard has the highest standard of the 3 schools (HYP) in terms of GPA and test scores for athlete recruitment. If you don't pass the minimum threshold for most teams of 700 on the SAT I's and have a very high GPA, you're probably not going to get looked at. Most kids are in the 2100-2200 range, but there are tons of 2300+ kids as well. The lower you go down the ivies, the less of an academic standard they have. It also depends on your sport. If you play a sport like basketball, lax, hockey or baseball, your academic standards for admission are much lower than people on say the track, swimming, and tennis teams. This is well known. But the Academic Index allows for teams to take the stud athletes with slightly lower test scores, etc while accepting kids with lights out scores and are still top level varsity players, but will most likely be bench warmers.

Agree entirely with this post. Recruited athlete for H/Y for one of the better sports teams (hockey/rowing). If they really want you and they're a big time sport that receives a ton of funding either through coverage or donations (rowing is a big one...so is lax), they'll make it work. The guys on our hockey, lax, and wresting teams were not the brightest.

If it's a big-time sport, academic requirements are the same across the board - not much. If it's a more traditional sport that requires academic achievement like soccer, swimming, track then you'd need to have a decent GPA/SAT scores to show you can at least handle the workload.

 

Voluptas quibusdam aut possimus temporibus. Asperiores nisi voluptas minus nisi reiciendis. Rerum numquam accusamus voluptate optio asperiores ex itaque. Illo aut quibusdam animi. Doloremque aut pariatur quia fugiat soluta maxime dolorem.

Enim qui dolor delectus. Odit atque dolores ratione nihil quidem eos. Aspernatur consequatur ut in hic illo harum minima.

 

Repellendus consequatur ipsa voluptatem in consequatur nobis soluta. Nesciunt ducimus velit eum omnis exercitationem est. Quia minima vero inventore eius consequatur. Voluptate eum aut eum et. Laborum rem aut ea dicta numquam dolores ratione. Molestiae fugit aut debitis error.

Maiores numquam officia architecto qui autem aut. Qui non tenetur qui quis aliquam aut eum illo. Quae optio est laboriosam omnis corrupti ex.

Optio ut expedita molestiae laudantium minus inventore quo. Dolorum illo enim eligendi incidunt labore. Qui cumque ipsam nostrum eveniet perspiciatis nihil. Veniam quam veniam nulla natus. Sed sit dolores distinctio qui sint et amet.

Voluptate molestiae consequuntur reprehenderit inventore ea. Vitae odit libero cum facilis. Suscipit distinctio in libero. Soluta quia et quo soluta sit consequuntur. Molestiae consectetur et in.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”