IB is not intellectually challenging
I thought IB would be great. Intellectually challenging but it just flat out isnt. The only incentive is the pay Imo. Is there any intellectually challenging fields in finance or can really anyone with a brain do this work?
Gotta be honest, I get pretty sick of this comment. We get it, you’re sooo smart even IB isn’t challenging enough for you. Maybe you can start by challenging yourself to do more than go through the motions. Create a macro that can be used across transaction types in excel so you only need one starting template no matter what deal, deep dive the companies in your comps set to find time-series trends relating to critical/inflection points of growth, etc. Your MD isn’t your college Philosophy teacher. It isn’t his job to stimulate you intellectually. And if you don’t have the initiative to figure out how to add value outside of going through the motions without fucking up, there’s a reason you’re working a day job and haven’t started your own business. That’s what someone who really wants an intellectual challenge would do, but you don’t actually want a challenge, you want someone to tee up pins for you in neat ways so you can feel good about yourself when you knock them down. Fuck yourself.
One of the best intern roasts I’ve seen yet!
You rock!
I know a bunch of 3.8+s from top schools who struggle with data analyses, pivot tables, LBOs, etc. They can barely wrap their heads around how to properly use Index Matches and get stuck when they have to do even slightly difficult data analyses using sumifs and things like that.
Content generation like CIM creation or process work isn't that bad for them though.
no freaking way lol. in ib?
Yeah, any sort of nested stuff like index match sumifs with offsets and stuff like that is way too complicated for them. As you probably know, most of IB is non-technical stuff so they've barely had to do any of it anyways. They just always get staffed on PPT and basic Excel work.
yeah. Index Match is Nobel laureate-level stuff. Right below curing cancer.
I am so tired (of this comment).
Academia. Finance is an interesting field for research, and you can specialize in an area you enjoy.
The main incentive for any job in the private sector is money, especially in finance. If youre on a salary, it’s because theyre paying you to get work done and make them money, not to intellectual stimulate you like you paid your university to do
Agreed. I find buyside more intellectually stimulating even though you are doing pretty similar analysis. Having to always think about investment merits and risks.
I could smell the monkey shit on this post before I opened it
Hi Intern in IB-M&A, I'm AQR Capital Management's head of HR. We were deeply impressed by your r/iamverysmart considerations and your opinion of puny mortals such as IB analysts.
Pls figure out my phone number and reach out, we are looking for impressive talent just like you.
Kind regards
We're not trying to reinvent the wheel here
Then why didn’t you get a PhD retard
Not OP but the pay of an academic is lower than what one could get in industry with the same qualifications, so I wouldn't be surprised to see really smart people not pursue that route.
IB is a role for bright, hardworking people who want to maximize optionality while also earning good-income. If you want to do something intellectually challenging you are more than welcome to become a quant researcher or cure cancer.. Does that sound too difficult for you?
F*cking moron
Haha get a FT offer first, then work 120 hours a week and see how sharp your brain is on even basic tasks.
Sure, because there is a genuine need to slave away for those 120+ hrs a week. I have yet to understand why someone would be proud of being explored this way.
Exactly. How is this a flex? Just embarrassing
1st-year analyst aged 23 or 24 saying, "Haha, get a FT offer first." lmao
Holy shit OP got body bagged hahaha
I mean how intellectual are you if you did not realize that beforehand? There is plenty of information about the work you do online. Plus, most entry-level jobs don't require crazy amounts of intellect bc, we as junior-level guys, do not have the knowledge or skill set yet to do the work that requires intellect
I made some points about intelligence in a previous post that I think were pretty interesting, and in my opinion accurate. Going to resurface some of that in this comment since I think it might be helpful.
I think we tend to conform to a very mainstream vision of what intelligent looks like or sounds like. Unless you’re working on complex data structures or quantum physics you are below the bar for certain occupations that others might consider intellectually prestigious. The fact of the matter is intelligence is relative in terms of the context tasks are being performed for.
One classic example of this are when people refer to artists as “musically genius”. Just because that person might be horrible at math doesn’t necessarily mean they are dumb. They’re simply gifted in a completely different way. It’s no different with finance, which requires a degree of numerical intelligence, but IB more specifically requires a high degree of verbal intelligence.
I think you should look internally and decide the exact capacities in which you think your work is not stimulating enough. IB requires a different type of intelligence than the mainstream concept of what intellect resembles.This doesn’t make it dull, just stimulating in different ways.
lmao STFU intern.
I don’t get why so much MS here. IB isn’t intellectually challenging at all, and no, most entry-level jobs aren’t this dull. I get that we aren’t paying to be intellectually stimulated like we were in college, but IB is just plain dumb. What are we even doing? Slaving away our 20s to make some rich people richer, aging like crazy and developing a plethora of mental and physical health issues in the process? This route is not even not intellectually challenging, it’s just plain dumb, And no, you don’t fully understand how bad this is until you actually start full-time. Understanding that this job is terrible is not a matter of intellect, but rather experience. Get over yourselves. There is no need to ostracize OP for expressing something that you all know it’s true, but that you try to deny as some form of self-preservation. Everyone I’ve met who has the intelectual capability to do anything more challenging (tech, engineering, quant) has jumped ship. And those who had the creativity, ambition, and risk appetite to start their own business also have. No shame in working in IB, but one has to acknowledge that many other jobs out there are way more intellectually challenging, and that your choice of career didn’t involve that. Again, no shame, but a necessary realization.
As someone who majored in cs and interned in cs, it's really not all that much different from IB lmao. Instead of an excel monkey, you're a code monkey and all of the "intellectually challenging" aspects of the job are done by people far more senior than you. It's just how entry-level jobs are. WSO really likes to put tech on a pedestal but all things considered, it's really a comparable job to IB.(difficulty wise) I don't disagree with your other points but to make a blanket statement like "Everyone I've met who has the intelectual capability to do anything more challenging (tech, engineering, quant) has jumped ship." is just patently false.
As someone who majored in Computer Engineering and Biomedical Engineering from a top school, and also has interned in both SWE and Product Management, I respectfully disagree. Surely my personal experience in IB and tech was different than yours, but you can't deny that today's top graduates, generally, don't go into IB anymore. There are a LOT of average people going into Finance, more so than in top tech companies and MBB. I also disagree that these are comparable jobs. At least in tech, you do get to use some creativity, and coding IS harder than updating some ppt. We aren't comparing Excel to coding here, as most of the time IB analysts aren't working on Excel anyways, but rather realigning logos. Lastly, the work you do in tech as an intern is a lot easier than what you do once you start full-time, at least from my experience and that of my friends. And yes, everyone that I've met that majored in something other than Economics, or was able to start a startup or work in something more intellectually challenging, has done so. I haven't said that EVERYBODY has, just that everybody I've met, which is a significant sample size, has jumped ship. Perhaps you need to sharpen up your text interpretation skills before claiming what's more intellectually challenging, but I get it.
I'm considering ditching the pursuit of a career in high finance completely and going for the option of starting my own business or continuing my family's business. Would you say other aspects of financial careers such as consulting is equally mind-numbing? Or is it just an IB thing.
Would appreciate it if we can talk more about this in DMs, if you don't mind offering some perspective. You seem to really know your shit.
Consulting, mind numbing with pretty colored graphs and less pay, consulting.
Bump.
Just leaving that there so this thread never dies.
Go be a quant at a hedge fund. If that's too much maybe you aren't as smart as you think you are.
Or do something outside of finance! There’s so much out there that’s intellectually challenging... Although this is a finance forum, I’m getting sick of people saying the only other options people have are within finance. Imo, IB just concentrates some of the worst aspects of working in finance, and leaving the field altogether might be a great, if not the best, option.
Academia is always there for you. All I've been promised in IB is "busy", not "stimulated".
This guy got lots of monkey shit - but truth is that very average kids get into IBD nowadays and the work (at least on junior level) is very admin type of work. When considering the hours, money is at best okay. Work is not intellectually stimulating as per below:
You receive comments on Sunday, 9pm on a deck that needs to be ready for Monday's pitch -
Hi XYZ,
Thx for this. Pls change below:
Change title to XYZ
p2 add KKR and Blackstone logos in the top left box
p2 remove ''consideration'' from the call out box
p3 change font to standard font we use
p6 order logos alphabetically in the right box
p7 put ''our added value'' in italics
p8 add call out box
p11 add source
p12 change 2020 to 2021 in second paragraph
p13 add ''strong capacity'' in the second to last bullet points
p16 reformat the charts manually to our format
p19 remove third bullet point
p21 insert a new page with top 2 charts from Goldman Sachs commodity markets survey p57
p25 resize the photos to 0.4cm*0.35cm
p26 add red line below latest transaction to separate from strategic M&A
p29 add a box to highlight 2020
p31 change the colour of the boxes to grey
p34 add usual disclaimer
add section dividers
add table of contents
Exactly. If someone has had an experience IB that's anymore intellectually challenging than this, let me know. I don't see how one can add value much beyond this (saying this as a top-bucket analyst) if they're forcing you to put in 120+ hours just updating stuff like this.
you get a "Hi XYZ"??? my emails from MD just start with "turn asap:"
I guess both sides contribute to that. From my point of view, I could not accept that we have to tell interns to use the standard fonts or to add a table of contents/section dividers/disclaimer. The more someone thinks along with me, the more we can save work and assign more intellectually challenging tasks.
this guy is a troll
He's never coming back from that roast
Quo molestiae facere odit soluta sequi libero dolores. Sint magni praesentium ea. Eos voluptatem est quia voluptate dolores incidunt. Aperiam deleniti placeat sequi ratione.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Aut reprehenderit officiis soluta adipisci et eos eveniet. Repudiandae consequatur qui velit officia ut. Aut ipsum itaque laboriosam. Ratione aliquid sint libero numquam dolor inventore debitis.
Autem doloremque nisi reprehenderit aperiam aliquam. Molestiae et rerum unde culpa.
Dolorum facere vitae qui ut autem. Et voluptate quo voluptas ut corporis nihil. Eos nihil nemo laudantium est ut. Quia non tempora quam porro. Illum impedit omnis nemo quaerat incidunt aut.
Quaerat dicta sint similique aut dolorum doloribus ut. Necessitatibus soluta necessitatibus nostrum voluptatem culpa illum aliquid. Id et quod quod temporibus quos mollitia. Esse cum adipisci vel nisi magnam. Qui odit dolor a doloribus.
Quo nostrum magni veniam dolores soluta nobis. Et recusandae necessitatibus tempore. Iste officiis laborum recusandae ipsa sed non quas. Maiores quod ut non in aut suscipit illo rerum. Consectetur aut sint dolor et qui. Commodi qui fugit nemo a.
Aut atque minus vel sed ut laboriosam expedita. Enim labore non voluptatem corrupti vel enim maxime. Qui est reprehenderit excepturi minus natus nihil.