I graduated from undergrad in '07. Upon graduating, I began working at an asset management firm as a junior research analyst (generalist). Less than three months into the job, I was contacted by a hedge fund with whom I interviewed during the prior school year and was obviously rejected from. I was told that they were interested in hiring another analyst and I inevitably ended up switching firms.

I'd appreciate any advice on whether or not I should include my brief experience with the asset management firm. If I were to not include it, my only relevant experience would be the hedge fund (I didn't do any finance-related internships while in school). As it stands, 3/4ths of my resume is dedicated towards highlighting my current job. Downsides I can think of include: 1. it may look strange only having one source of work experience (regardless of the fact that I am less-than-two years out of school; and 2. it would likely make for a harder interview when going over my background (of course this would be irrelevant if leaving it off produces more interviews. Downsides associated with including it are: 1. appears as though I jump ship easily; and 2. my role at the asset management firm was less signficant than that at my current fund.

I've asked a few other people for their advice on the issue and I've gotten mixed results. I didn't think posting the actual resume was necessary, but if it is please let me know and I will do so.


Comments (2)


It's important for your to current job to take up most of the space for the reasons you already give. But I would definitely put the asset man. job down because it adds color to your resume - it will explain the time gap and the more experience the better. Recruiters know people change jobs all the time and you can always explain it.

Chase Us, Break In

Financial Modeling

Add a Comment