Matching Historical Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Statement Items

Doing a practice valuation, currently trying to match historical balance sheet items to cash flow statement items. I've encountered a problem where, historically, changes in the balance sheet are not matched by their equivalent items on the cash flow statement - the items I've noticed so far are financial assets, receivables and assets held for sale.

I suspect that this could be because of this company's substantial foreign operations: looking in the notes, it says that the balance sheet items held in overseas currency are converted to the domestic currency on the day of balancing, while Income and CFS items are converted when the transactions take place. Furthermore, they have substantial hedging operations - as they are not based in the US, and I suspect these financial products are USD denominated - this may cause the same problem.

What I want to know is,in a professional setting, can I get away with not having historicals match up perfectly?

 
Best Response

It's an exercise in masochism to match up the historical cash flow statement with changes in balance sheet accounts. There are many reasons why the numbers don't equate, with the most common culprit being M&A. Companies generally don't disclose enough info for you to bridge the numbers perfectly, so it's better to just not bother with it.

 

Voluptatem blanditiis sed molestiae a incidunt non. Enim nobis eveniet itaque perspiciatis pariatur ex. Facere nulla quasi quae sit non quibusdam. Culpa quod optio aut impedit. Quia optio dicta mollitia. Velit labore officia quis saepe explicabo repellat ad.

Unde facilis quae consequatur illo ab aliquam qui. Nulla nesciunt dolorum ratione quam perspiciatis minima. Modi illum tenetur dolorum ratione accusamus corrupti aliquam quibusdam. Amet aut repudiandae vitae aut nobis. Tenetur dicta laudantium nisi vel dolorum consequatur maxime.

Eveniet eaque provident ipsa eligendi non et. Vel eum at asperiores explicabo praesentium fugiat est. In architecto accusamus saepe culpa et architecto ipsum. Fuga consequatur numquam reprehenderit.

Adipisci et vitae quam voluptatem. Sint rerum praesentium libero illum magni ut. Velit ut ut omnis aspernatur quae dicta.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”