Most Innovative Real Estate Projects and Companies

As I sit here at my desk procrastinating by flipping through Urban Land magazine, I'm peppered by images of Boston Properties/Hines' Salesforce Tower, a top ten list of buildings with technologies that add versatility and conserve resources, and a description of how Related's Hudson Yards uses "big data" to analyze how people interact with the project. With how incredibly dull so many properties are, including the one I'm writing a quarterly report for, I'm interested in finding out what (relatively new) projects you think are truly innovative as well as what companies drive that innovation.

This could be design, construction methods, purpose - whatever separates it from the generic.

 

I think Katerra is the most innovative real estate/construction tech firm around right now. Looks to vertically integrate the construction process where as a developer, you are not dealing with engineer x, architect y, and interior designer z. Rather, you work with Katerra Construction, Katerra Engineering, Katerra Architecture, etc. Valued at $3 billion currently, should be interesting to see how they grow.

 
cusered17

I think Katerra is the most innovative real estate/construction tech firm around right now. Looks to vertically integrate the construction process where as a developer, you are not dealing with engineer x, architect y, and interior designer z. Rather, you work with Katerra Construction, Katerra Engineering, Katerra Architecture, etc. Valued at $3 billion currently, should be interesting to see how they grow.

Not trying to make fun of you or anything, because I've certainly made some predictions that didn't come true, but man - what an ice cold take in hindsight. 

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

Really interested in a small startup called Icon Builders. Constructs small homes in a fraction of the time/cost with the use of one large 3D printer. I think they're mostly focused on developing impoverished villages in third world countries right now which is awesome, but if that technology gets scaled out, oh my.

Not too high, not too low
 

SPP in Tampa is basically building a new downtown Tampa Bay. It's a bunch of old JBG developers, financed by the Jeff Vinik and the Gates Foundation, trying to build an urban smart city with smart infrastructure, A/C cooling towers, water, sewer, etc. all done for multiple city blocks instead of one-off.

But it's in Tampa.

“Capitalism: God’s way of determining who is smart and who is poor.” Ron Swanson
 
RE Pirate:
SPP in Tampa is basically building a new downtown Tampa Bay. It's a bunch of old JBG developers, financed by the Jeff Vinik and the Gates Foundation, trying to build an urban smart city with smart infrastructure, A/C cooling towers, water, sewer, etc. all done for multiple city blocks instead of one-off.

But it's in Tampa.

And they're hiring a Development Manager.

...in Tampa

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

I think any new company that disrupts the historical way of building infrastructure/analyzing data/conducting the flow of capital from sources --> investors --> developers (etc.)

I've seen a bunch of companies making buildings using empty shipping containers. I've not looked at the metrics but supposedly this drastically cuts cost (and time) vs. the traditional stick build of old.

That begs the questions: Talking specifically about companies that are disrupting the way the physical infrastructure is built (whether 3D printing, shipping containers, whatever) do they de-value older buildings constructed using the tried-and-true building techniques of the past? * For example, a 10-story multifamily building on corner x of a tier 1 city is being developed using the older techniques. Similarly, another brand new multifamily building, with identical specs is built in the adjacent plot using the newer/cheaper methods of construction (call it shipping containers). Ignoring a debate about supply and demand/highest/best use, which one would you want to acquire? Assuming you charge identical rents, presumably the one with lower construction costs. Ignoring again the supply and demand question, and looking at pure costs, do you overlook another 10-story multifamily with exact specs built in 1995 three blocks away if the newer build is cheaper/a more economical investment?

 

I like this question but think it's a bit over simplified practically speaking. Generally, the quality of construction developed by a merchant builder is going to be inferior to a long-term hold type of developer. The merchant builder wants to keep his cost basis as low as possible, and will probably skimp on things like sound attenuation, waterproofing details, floor assemblies, and a lot of the finishes (lighting/plumbing fixtures, flooring, etc.). So, hard to compare a modular product vs. a traditional wood frame product in a vacuum without knowing who built them.

Type I or Type III deals are usually valued higher than Type V. The difference in cap rates is debatable but investors typically place a premium on concrete/steel construction for its superior longevity and lessened deferred maintenance expenses. Modular assemblies usually are of the former variety. Modular also has better QC--ie, more consistently built, and better tested electrical work and general MEP coordination.

 

P2P lending to developers as banks have abandoned small scale developers - too much work for too much risk. Oh wait, all the P2Ps are going bust - I guess a 12% guarantee is not really true and after the truly good developers in '12 got financing the shit ones started to crop back up thereafter and retail was too happy to lend anything to anyone.

 

Golub's Chicago office is converting the Tribune Tower into condos which I think is a great use for the gothic tower. The east loop and central loop are becoming a graveyard for office towers as a new Class A trophy buildings are being delivered quarterly in the west loop and along the river.

Fulton Market is a highly inovative neighborhood. Developers Sterling Bay and Shapack Partners played major roles in convincing the city government to rezone the former meatpacking district. The whole project took off when the Merchandise Mart couldn't accommodate Google's demand for space so they decided to roll the dice and build their Chicago office in Fulton market sparking a development boom, which led to the Soho House and McDonalds HQ entering the picture. This began attracting restaurants, tech firms, and major retailers to the formerly bleak area of Chicago's West Loop. Now its a sea of construction and may be the most ideal location in the city to live due to its proximity to the river where most firms have moved their offices.

 

Yeah I'm not sure it's particularly innovative, but it is incredible. I spent a long weekend there in April and I know it was a big part of the recent ULI Fall Meeting. Del Mar is a fantastic restaurant if you visit.

They're hiring a development manager for Phase II also...

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

I'm going to merge project and company into trend - and I'm going with the emergence of the urban infill, class-b, value-add industrial funds. This was/still is some high stakes poker - wildly general/aggressive MLAs, huge credit risks throughout rent rolls - justified only by the exit. This trend ripped rents and $/sf in what was really a sleepy sector dominated by mixed-use developers covered land plays. There are some studs in the space, and every single one was playing in the space 5-10-years ago. There is, however, a large portion of ill-informed bets that are destined to fail, and badly. This made industrial sexy, got the kids jazzed up about it, created the shallow-bay craze. Before it was 250 and expand to 250 out in the middle of nowhere, it's evolved more in 3-years than most sectors have in their existence - and you can follow it right to the money.

To that end, I'm going with MDH out of Atlanta as the GOAT. They were the first, look it up. Assembled a portfolio of what the rest of the market thought was absolute garbage. The only group paying up on $/SF for urban assets and the only group going after flex/shallow-bay. Year later they flip the portfolio to BX for DUMB MONEY - market paid attention and created a wave of Stan funds. S/O MDH.

 

Rerum voluptatem necessitatibus et quidem quo autem. Similique iure ut ex soluta maxime et.

Molestias dignissimos voluptatibus voluptate nisi et. Molestias eum aut labore qui nihil odit ipsa. Accusamus aut omnis unde. Ea rerum a corrupti ab. Aut natus ratione omnis cum consectetur.

Nam id ea ipsa velit et et. Perspiciatis et doloribus eveniet ut.

 

Necessitatibus laboriosam vel assumenda nemo autem perferendis. Laboriosam unde in facilis.

Saepe alias id repellendus fugiat ullam aut. Illo quidem dolores ipsam quisquam rerum nostrum. Ea pariatur non quia explicabo qui. Optio delectus molestiae ut saepe ut quam.

Omnis repellendus velit porro et quam rerum officia. Sunt consequatur ea aspernatur eveniet sapiente molestiae. Praesentium animi omnis repudiandae rerum et. Voluptas et sed placeat doloremque et quod suscipit.

 

Doloremque ratione ut mollitia velit. Aut illo autem dignissimos aut. A rerum error blanditiis mollitia deserunt molestiae laudantium. Maiores optio enim quia voluptates quis voluptatibus. Dicta sed aut rem.

Sit quia dolores nesciunt est. Laborum praesentium veniam placeat dolor adipisci delectus quibusdam. Quam accusamus sed eaque id quo. Quaerat sit maiores necessitatibus. Delectus quo illo et iste nesciunt maiores autem.

Illo velit velit voluptatum unde vitae sint. Quia quia autem debitis debitis. Fugit et facere sapiente ut necessitatibus. Ratione quis modi incidunt debitis. Vel ipsa tenetur explicabo molestiae commodi ea est. Dolorem veritatis minus quo at omnis provident.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”