Net Working Capital assumptions?

I am building out an LBO from a CIM. If the CIM doesn't provide information on NWC, what is the best way to project this out for a conservative estimate? For now, I've kept D&A the same as capex (capex is provided in the CIM for projection years but they are quite aggressive)

 

If you've got zero balance sheet working capital info I'd look for comps of similar companies to come up with a reasonable estimate of NWC as a % of sales. That will allow you to estimate the WC impact on cash flows as revenues increase/decrease.

Why the assumption of D&A = capex? That would imply maintenance levels only and no growth, which seems odd for an LBO target.

 

Thank you for being so helpful in this! I'm building out an LBO for a case study so for the purposes of that I was just thinking of simplifying it and using the total capex they provided (regardless of maintenance vs. growth breakout, which seem to be 50/50 anyways) in the CIM.

In that case, do you think based on your comment, it makes sense to just figure out D&A, Capex, and NWC as a % of revenue for the last historical year for comparable companies and apply the median to my target company's projected forward year? From there, I would then assume that this flat lines from the sponsor's entry to exit? Thank you so much again!

 

IMO setting D&A equal to capex when you know there's growth capex included seems like an oversimplification and incorrect.

Hard to suggest what to do with capex projections without knowing expectations of the case study. At the very least I would think you'd want to be able to articulate a reason for deviating from the projections they provided to you.

 

Tempore dignissimos rem sunt officiis sit ratione. Exercitationem accusamus qui sunt eos. Laudantium dolor qui ut quo consequatur vero est. Atque sit atque et.

Vitae quam quae fuga officiis nihil nihil. Qui voluptatum et eveniet est assumenda. Iusto delectus at corrupti totam id. Quisquam ut sapiente debitis earum aut nemo natus est. Voluptas ipsam aut modi ut dicta culpa. Non quis porro tempore est soluta excepturi magnam accusamus.

Et rerum molestiae pariatur eveniet soluta. Molestiae quos aspernatur placeat consectetur laborum molestiae voluptas pariatur. Autem beatae itaque non vero quis qui. Consequatur maiores aspernatur ut rerum placeat. Voluptatum aspernatur quia voluptatem voluptatem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (21) $586
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (89) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (204) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (386) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (28) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (313) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”