Please no tangents regarding the validity of the elections here, thanks.

I find it hilarious that you mention this.  I think anyone rational would not drive the conversation this way.  

But to answer your question.  I would not want to be a junior staffer on an O&G team right now.  Personally I think we have have still a few more decades of the industry before it dead (as in gone).  Granted valuations are already shit and they probably wont bounce back to any level, however we haven't seen the investment in renewables that are needed to fully replace O&G which might be a good transition for O&G teams (rebrand them as energy teams). however there are still large players in the space OPEC players that I doubt will let the market die under the Biden administration.  

 

I would be grateful that

1. I have a great internship

2. I have an inside look to how Senior MD are looking at the market and handling things.  

I wouldn't be to concerned with the market forces as an Intern. I would just focus on doing a good job and learning as much as possible.  Make a decision after your internship.  Worst case scenario, you don't even a return offer and then worrying about getting stuck in O&G is already solved for you.  Best case scenario you do an analyst stint and then lateral to a different market group if you don't like the way your team is going.  

 

As a Houston IB professional, I can speak to how my team / my peers are looking at the O&G space. In short, the sector has been under enormous pressure for almost two years now and the bottom line is the government cannot fix the fundamental flaws in the shale business model. I think a shift towards an unfriendly regime will only hasten the pace of consolidation and increase investment in renewable energy companies, which will be extremely beneficial in the short term for the best positioned banks. In addition, the restructuring wave is FAR from over and I could see it accelerating as some of these energy companies try to tap the disinterested capital markets and refinance debt over the next 3 years. 

If I were a junior banker with any interest outside of O&G, I would start pursuing that path ASAP because the longer you stay in energy the harder it is to leave. Rising to the ranks of MD at an energy bank will still be a thing, but there are simply going to be less seats in the future. In addition, energy PE has been getting absolutely CRUSHED so there will be fewer buy-side exit opps. 

Summary:

Winners - banks focused on alternative energy, restructuring shops and the sierra club

Losers - VPs, young MDs with big mortgages, and product groups

 

Generally yes but some head hunters will show you other opportunities if you indicate interest outside of energy. That being said, the non-energy opportunities they show you will certainly be worse. A BB O&G analyst will not be given looks at the top MMs or MFs by head hunters, the candidate will have to do the leg work to get invited to those processes (network)

 

As a second year at a “top shop” in Houston, I’ll give you the advice I wish I got: get out before you get in, if you can help it.
 

Morale is so low right now (even before COVID and the blue wave). Deal flow is fine but the problem is that O&G deals just aren’t as transferable to a generalist model as any other industry. 

 

Can see the appeal but I’m just tired of the process heavy nature of it all. No thought process behind the consolidation wave and don’t get me started with cap raises. With restructuring, while each situation may have their own unique dynamics, you can’t fix a shitty business model (i.e. every shale / OFS company in existence)

edit: apologies for the negativity 

 

Someone please tell me if/where I'm wrong, but here's why I think O&G is screwed in the US:

1. Each shale oil well produces lots of oil in a very quick period of time (~6 mos.), after that point very very little oil per well. That's every well in the US. Let's ignore shale gas for now.
2. So to produce a lot of oil so that you have sizeable revenues over many many years, you're probably going to have to drill a lot (assuming you don't expand)!
3. But there's only so much land...more importantly, there's only so much profitable land (like Permian) when oil is below $50-60/bbl
4. So you end up drilling wells that are closer and closer together. So each incremental well produces less oil. Things get crowded.
5. Fast forward to the present day, and after 10 years, a lot of the most profitable land in the US has been drilled out or occupied. And what's left isn't profitable unless prices skyrocket (cartel's block that) or costs plummet (won't happen if it hasn't already)

So your left with a sector with few growth options on US soil. At least in oil.
So why in the world would you want to be a banker covering a sector with few growth opportunities. The O&G sector was not exciting because of the XOM, CVX and BGHE's of the world (they were around in 2000-2010 when O&G banking was pretty bare)...it was because of APC/CHK/etc. (which emerged during the shale boom from 2010 onwards when O&G banking became a huge thing). So when that group begins to dwindle or run out of growth, or restructure, you've got nothing except the slow bleeding that we have today.

To me, that's the key structural issue that precludes the emergence of enough new issuers/companies for there to be a meaningful O&G sector to cover as a banker. But please tell me where I'm off, or if you agree.

 

corp bank side is kind of stale mated right now. all these banks came with capital to do all these RBL deals for junior E&P companies because RBL was regarded as "king" of structures. SO FLAWED as this pandemic and low valuations have shown to where banks have now lost noticeable $$$$ on smaller producers, mostly ones backed by equity sponsors too......what a shocker. the cycle of equity wanting as much bank $ as possible, record loan losses, now banks reassessing strategies and wanting to trim lesser rated names. translates = "IG and diversified" energy focus that is a dense space with every bank in town wanting these relationships, fewer new financings, and all this money lost in interim with very little gained on IB mandate side vs loan losses sustained. YEP, totally logical. Fun stuff

 

Are there any banks in Houston that are insulated from the O&G fallout? I've heard second-hand stories of there being Renewables / Energy Transition focused groups, but don't have specific insight.

 

Have any Houston banks already begun downsizing, aside from the BMO shutdown?

 

Got a friend that is a 2nd year at Rice. They placed 17 compared to 20+ last year. He said that in general summer associate internship spots were either the same as last year (EBs, Simmons, Barclays) or down (most BBs and MMs). 

Not going to say too much but pretty sure that UT sent a similar amount as last year 12-15. McCombs has stronger consulting and tech placement so IB recruiting isn't as popular. 

Also northeast schools had low interest in Houston this year. Think Booth sent a couple.

 

Recently lateraled from a MM energy shop to an industrials group at another shop. As others said, getting crushed hours wise with very little MM M&A activity. Just didn’t make sense to stay on. Happy I’m gone.

I’m not quite as bearish as others on this thread but either way covering a cyclical industry in the middle of a downturn is not ideal. Assuming US shale gets smaller and smaller down the road and same with the energy groups. The returns aren’t there for investors, and won’t be surprised with other banks trying to start close out energy loan portfolios. Didn’t BMO buy DBs book if I remember correctly? And that didn’t work. Most banks have a ton of exposure to energy and I bet would love to get out of a lot of it if it wasn’t for ruining relationships and losing what fees are left. Time will only tell and I’m assuming the US O&G industry will look much different in 10-15 years. Downturns force change. In terms of bankers covering renewables that was done out of our Power group. From what I’ve seen in tombstone I feel like that space is very green, didn’t seem like a lot of M&A to go around but more on the financing side (tax-exempt, etc). I feel like most banks are trying to figure out a way to cover it, especially given ESG trends and pure play utilities that have focused on renewables have benefited it from a stock performance/valuation perspective. But since it’s so new, not a lot of bankers out there with knowledge of the space and very small pie of M&A to go around. At least that’s been my takeaway from when our group discussed it

 

Would also note to any incoming SA or An1s, avoid Jefferies Houston at all costs. I know a few people there and I can confidently say it sounds like one of the worst banks in America to work at right now. Analysts consistently pulling 100+ weeks for stupid work that clearly isn't going anywhere, moral is low with a lot of talent fleeing the scene. They used to be the kings of energy and pay analysts $200,000+ and associates $400,000+, now I think those numbers are closer to $140,000 and $250,000, and when you combine that with horrible hours and a mediocre analyst program (no first year modelling) I think you are looking at a pretty raw deal. If energy rebounds I am sure they will resume their status as a juggernaut, but until then I would avoid unless you are an energy hardo.  

 

Would love to hear any further thoughts from an associate perspective.

As an analyst at least you have better (and assumed) exit opps, but I'm curious what the sentiment is for the post-MBA crowd. If you actually wanted to climb the ranks in O&G IB, is that still reasonable or are there going to be fewer and fewer seats/promotions? If you want to leave as an associate/vp are there decent corp dev openings within the space still up for grabs?

 
Most Helpful

Way too many people are way too confident that Energy investment banking is on the decline. The industry has always been cyclical and also Energy does not equal O&G. The people who work at these banks are grown men who are trying to make money just like any other investment banker. They won’t just sit there and watch their careers disappear. Royalty interest asset backed securities, carbon capture technology, carbon credit investment, flare mitigation technology, liquified natural gas, obviously restructuring, direct foreign investment, and many other opportunities.

In addition, many of the Houston groups are already committed to the renewables space. Goldman, Citi, and Lazard I know all have renewables/energy tech focused MDs in Houston. I imagine others will do the same or already have. Also, I know of 3 banks that have power and utilities bankers in Houston (wouldn’t be surprised if that number doubles by end of 2021).

Very frustrating to hear analysts or salty “I got burned last downturn” bankers come on here and pretend that Houston finance or banking is doomed. Energy sector will outperform the S&P in 2021 and 2022. Renewables and O&G will grow together as the global energy mix shifts over the next few decades.

Realized I didn't answer your question. I think now is a great time to enter the O&G banking industry. Tons of opportunity coming up. 

 

Quod occaecati ducimus odio possimus optio quaerat magnam. Et omnis cupiditate laborum consequatur. Ut doloribus modi quibusdam itaque soluta.

Quos excepturi quaerat dicta perspiciatis. Qui consequatur aperiam fugiat harum quasi quia dolore. Nemo exercitationem impedit aliquam eum. Et hic voluptatibus est amet commodi.

Corrupti sapiente aut harum dolore reiciendis neque voluptatem. Et ipsam nobis nulla ea modi eos.

 

Illum nostrum est debitis veniam consequatur exercitationem eos. Tenetur in dolore est ut tempore rerum iure. Ipsum voluptatum nihil at distinctio et et. Qui sequi tempora assumenda.

Quod dolore voluptatibus praesentium sunt eum molestiae doloribus quo. Dignissimos maiores aliquid accusamus distinctio odio magnam qui. Maiores ipsam ducimus ratione fugiat. Quia ut deserunt doloribus nostrum adipisci consequatur repellat. Assumenda soluta sed nesciunt molestiae repellat eos placeat.

Minus voluptatibus culpa voluptatum totam dolorem ad consequatur. Voluptas quis sed omnis. Ut error ea eos pariatur reprehenderit. Explicabo dolorem omnis sit cupiditate voluptas aut aut enim.

Nemo distinctio distinctio eius qui molestiae aspernatur architecto. Esse hic ex et deserunt alias. Cumque voluptas rerum minima nostrum impedit in qui totam. Enim expedita perspiciatis illum eos at.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”