Related threads are either outdated or results are scattered, what are the BB's or EB's with reputable Real Estate IB groups after Citi, JPM, and BAML? Looking for opinions on exit ops and deal flow. Thanks a bunch
| +86 | Drunk VP. How to manage? | 28 | 12h |
| +44 | Lazard US Views 2026/2027 | 16 | 10h |
| +41 | Who is the final boss in Houston Energy? (GS, JEFF or EVR) | 9 | 14h |
| +37 | Tomorrow Will Be Better | 5 | 19h |
| +34 | Moelis PCA vs Lower tier BB Coverage | 20 | 2h |
| +28 | Why Do We Turn Comments? | 3 | 17h |
| +22 | UBS’s Investment Bank Is Building an AI Slop Factory | 2 | 16h |
| +21 | How early is to early? | 9 | 1d |
| +21 | [2026 - October] Unbiased Prestige Rankings | 7 | 15h |
| +20 | MS NYC Generalist Program Group Rankings & Placement Process | 11 | 21h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
This question has been asked 10+ times over the past few weeks.
As has been stated, all the BB's REGAL groups are very similar. If you look at league tables, the "best" bank (call it BAML, for example), only has ~5-8% market share, whereas the "worst" bank (call it UBS, for example), only has ~3-5% of the market.
There is very little difference between all the BB's, but it might be advisable to join MS/JPM/GS/BAML/CS/BAR/CITI just because BB's dominate the REGAL space, and you want to join a reputable BB that still will give you strong exits both within the REGAL space, and in PE more broadly.
The nature of REGAL work is that it is very debt intensive, and therefore EBs have a harder time winning mandates.
They're far from similar. Deal flow at CS and UBS has been lagging. Would be difficult to compare these two to BAML, Citi, MS.
Not true. Look at 2019 and 2020 YTD league tables.
I know DB is up there. One of the top groups at DB
BAML has dominated real estate since the GFC, both in terms of fees and total transaction value. It is the group to be in if you want Real Estate PE exit opps. Then followed by Citi, MS, JPM, and DB.
How do CS, WF, and UBS stack up? I've heard mixed
CS > UBS > WF
Best is definitely BAML followed by Citi/GS/RBC/MS for strong RE
This is accurate I had the chance to interview with BAML REGL IB can confirm
How was the process / interview?
How are they ranked based on M&A, equities, and debt respectively?
Can u do corporate PE from Regl IB or are you limited to repe?
See my comment below.
On that note, does doing RE IB pigeonhole you into only RE PE for the most part? Also what's the comp/progression difference between LBO PE and RE PE?
Yes and no. The RE group is mostly for people with some level of interest in the industry. At the MF level, there's little comp/progression difference between corporate PE and REPE. The RE funds of BX, KKR, TPG, and etc have very flexible investment strategy, so you will also work on LBOs there (think BX & Hilton, BX & EOP, TPG & Cushman and Wakefield).
following
How much do exit opps differ between top and bottom REGL groups?
Being in a top REGL group means better M&A deal flow, and your deal experience matters a lot during buyside interviews. With that being said, exit opps highly depend on the person's caliber.
How does DB fare in REGL? thx
DB used to have one of the top REGL groups until the recent senior bankers exodus (heavy hitters like Amish Barot left for PJT).
Barclays
No idea on dealflow or exit opps (believe it's not too fantastic) but have a friend there who says the culture is great.
Wb Jefferies
bump ^
Would love to know about Jeff in Charlotte
Same ^ would love some info on the REGAL group
do well in gaming specifically
How is Houlihan Lokey?
Analyst class is like 1-2 a year. Not great place to start at IMO
Top groups are BAML, Citi, MS, GS, Barclays
How is jpm?
lemme guess u got a lateral interview invite?
Quia sint rerum ab magnam odio. Qui veritatis dolores laborum. Reprehenderit architecto excepturi soluta vitae facere. Autem consequatur et ut provident voluptatum architecto omnis. Nam sed quisquam cupiditate amet voluptatem doloribus dolorum.
Non soluta quaerat vero ducimus enim impedit ut. Sunt deleniti modi maiores est modi. Molestias incidunt laborum sit quae asperiores placeat quia. Sunt a aperiam repellat ullam sed asperiores praesentium. Libero et officia et quas.
Necessitatibus illo esse ab autem voluptas et. Soluta molestias est consequatur architecto error consectetur esse. Vel et enim in et perspiciatis atque non. Repellendus rerum corrupti ut facilis qui est.
Perferendis est deleniti soluta accusamus nostrum. Quis voluptas doloribus quaerat quia. Rerum quo hic ea soluta est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Impedit voluptatem et rem similique explicabo. In ut eligendi animi debitis sapiente voluptas. Debitis est ipsa autem rerum sunt excepturi enim.
Et totam voluptas quae eum alias nesciunt optio. Dolor voluptatem temporibus nostrum dignissimos consequuntur. Voluptas sed sed dolorum sunt aliquid id sint consequuntur. Rerum eveniet quaerat consequatur repellat. Reiciendis et quis voluptas debitis illum alias blanditiis. Facere officia temporibus occaecati est ea pariatur quam. Harum similique id cum consequatur error aut ipsam.
Assumenda ratione tempore voluptas distinctio. Quia fugiat ut deserunt in dolores aut esse molestiae. Eos eligendi est iure consequatur voluptatum nostrum.
Est praesentium et perferendis facilis quia dolor. Est expedita magni voluptas. Dolore aliquid itaque doloremque quis error eos tempora tenetur.