The Case for Choosing a Non-Target

Hello all. Long time lurker here who recently "made it" by winning a summer offer for 2019 at a top independent advisory shop (think EVR/CVP/PWP). I want to reflect on my experience recruiting and hopefully help out some prospective monkeys in the process.

My background- I currently go to a large state school. In high school I was a 4.0 student, Eagle Scout, debater (read: nerd virgin). I knew I wanted to go into banking and applied to top targets, getting into two schools that place lights out. I also applied to my mom's alma mater, a southern state school. They offered me their premiere full scholarship. I had to choose between a top target and a free state school, a decision that I am sure has faced or will face many young users of this site. Most of those users would take the top target in a heartbeat. I did the opposite. Here's why-

Money

I would be lying if I said that this was not the biggest factor in my decision. If you have the stats to go to a target school, there are many solid state schools that will literally fly you out senior year of high school to offer to throw money at you. I was in the grey area financially where I didn't get any financial aid at the targets I got into, but the decision to attend would have created a lot of stress for my family and saddled me with a mountain of debt. Free school is good school.

Specialized Banking Programs and Ultra-Motivated Alumni

Many state schools have selective investment banking clubs or programs. Off the top of my head, I know that South Carolina, Columbia has a program that placed into Goldman and MS last year, UGA has a program that places kids into Goldman every year and IU has a famous program that places lights out. The difference between these programs and a target's general population is that the non-target programs and their alumni bases are a lot smaller. This actually works as an advantage because it puts pressure on alumni to grow the presence of their school on the street. I had alumni call friends at other banks to get me interviews and invite me to stay with them in the city. They FIGHT for kids from their school.

Big Fish, Small Pond

It's not hard to find opportunities to grow your technical knowledge and start/ lead programs at a non-target. With less kids wanting to go into the industry, leadership positions in finance clubs are much more accessible. The group of students interested in banking is small and thus out to help each other succeed rather than compete with one another. A current senior at my school teaches free financial modeling lessons to freshmen. On the academics side, grades come easy. This allows more time to actually focus on learning technical skills or take part time internships or network.

Fun

If you have ever had the opportunity to spend a Saturday in the fall at an SEC school for a home game, you know what I'm saying. Even if the bar/ party scene isn't necessarily "better" at a state school than an ivy (it is) the easy academic course load lets you partake in recreation more often.

TL;DR: The cream will rise to the top no matter where you go to undergrad. If you are willing to put in the work, strategically choosing to attend a non-target school could be the best decision you ever make.

Hope I helped at least a few young folks. Feel free to disagree or ask me anything in the comments.

 

This is idiotic because people can make tiers as big or small as they want. I went to a university ranked around 20th in US News. By some measures that's top tier. But "zoom in" and it could be 5th tier . . if the top tier is Harvard/Yale/Princeton and so forth.

Hell, your own ranking shows it . . why are the so-called "tiers" 1a and 1b instead of 1 and 2?

Just silly. Bottom line is, the OP grouped EVR/CVP/PWP together to give a rough idea of a top boutique and that wasn't a strange thing to do. You have Lazard in your "1b" tier and people group with better EB's all the time.

 

if you know what you want and go to a non-target and work towards it you'll be fine. Large schools with specialized banking clubs will give you plenty of opportunities. Penn State's Nittany Lion Fund for example placed plenty of kids in ER/IB roles at BB. I did not go to a target school so it's hard for me to give a comparison but I can say the opportunities will be there if you work towards them

 

Spot on. Also had the same situation, and decided to go to a school ranked around 75 in USNews instead of Top 25. You have to hustle more, but if it's a $100K difference and it's coming out of your pocket, it's an easy choice if the non-target ever does place people. The schools that place IB. To be honest, all it takes is a good GPA, at least one relevant internship, and hustle to make it from semi-decent state schools.

 
Most Helpful

First, congrats on the offer. But just wanted to play devil’s advocate to point out that non-target disadvantages don’t vanish just because you got the same job as kids at Wharton right out of college. (I also went to non-target for financial reasons.) The network you start with at a target school is far bigger, and that goes long way. Fast forward 20 years, if you went to a target school, chances are a lot of your college friends are spread out all over in high finance / corporate world. Your sheer size of network, having your former classmates/roommates now as CEO/GP will put you at a great advantage. On a side note, I personally believe this is why BB > EB for non-target school kids, given the size of class.

Obviously, as you progress and continue to be successful in your career, these things matter less. After all, opportunity presents itself to those who are qualified. Keep up the good work and share your story when you have become even more successful.

 
hot1590:
First, congrats on the offer. But just wanted to play devil’s advocate to point out that non-target disadvantages don’t vanish just because you got the same job as kids at Wharton right out of college. (I also went to non-target for financial reasons.) The network you start with at a target school is far bigger, and that goes long way. Fast forward 20 years, if you went to a target school, chances are a lot of your college friends are spread out all over in high finance / corporate world. Your sheer size of network, having your former classmates/roommates now as CEO/GP will put you at a great advantage. On a side note, I personally believe this is why BB > EB for non-target school kids, given the size of class.

Obviously, as you progress and continue to be successful in your career, these things matter less. After all, opportunity presents itself to those who are qualified. Keep up the good work and share your story when you have become even more successful.

I sort of disagree. I was a state school kid and worked at 2 BBs in S&T and then IB. Honestly, all of my work friends went to targets and many of my colleagues went to b-school at H/S/W. It’s not hard to just ask your friends for intros and just leverage those networks without the opportunity cost. Just my 2c.

 

Couldn’t agree more

If you go to a non target you can kiss being a CEO, Big-Swinging-Dick, partner at PE fund, etc GOODBYE

Look at the MDs and senior guys at your bank or PE fund. Almost all of their connections, clients/partners, are going to be connections through college. It’s just such a handicap coming from an SEC school.

Really sad to see people justify not going to HYP. Just suck it up and pay $250k for college - there’s no other way to make it on Wall Street

Fuckin my way thru nyc one chick at a time
 

hot1590 Good point here on the target vs. non-target network. I've found that grit and preparing before your sophomore year will overcome all/most of the common barriers associated with non-targets missing the boat on IB recruiting. However, the fact that the bulk of my graduating class will not move on to become F500 CEOs and the like, my fellow non-target bankers and I won't be starting our careers with the same long-term network that the target guys will have.

In my opinion, this does not mean we are doomed to be mediocre bankers, but it just says the grind isn't over to becoming the "whole package." Just my thoughts, and it's always beneficial to recognize your weaknesses and figure out how to improve them.

 

Truly - what a ludicrous idea. With recruiting moving further and further up, non-targets are FUCKED if they want a career in finance. Those investment banking recruiting clubs at non-targets don’t do SHIT.

If you think you can compete with targets while going to Indiana, you’re out of your FUCKING mind. I’ve never heard anything more preposterous

And honestly, college is four short years of your life. How much fun you have, the culture of the school, or the friendships you make really dont matter that much. So as a 17-18 year old, you should be making your college decision based primarily on how well it will prepare you for investment banking / medicine / whatever your desired career path is. Anyone who disagrees is going to eating my DUST as I zoom past them on my career path.

Fuckin my way thru nyc one chick at a time
 

I mean most of the points in my post also pertain to people who don't have the high school stats to get into a target. In that case, choosing which non-target to attend is an inevitable question. Moreover, I find it highly unlikely that me and all of my peers in my ibanking program won the lottery and just happened to luck into great summer analyst opportunities on wall street. Finally, I know that I want to live and work in the south after my analyst stint. My SEC connections down here will go farther than any target. Even if that wasn't the case, however, I would still be comfortable with my decision turning down targets and will enjoy my early twenties doing interesting work at a great shop without worrying about student debt. I am sure that you are very proud of getting into a good school, so I do not expect you to understand my point of view. To each his own.

 

I'm 99.9% sure the accelerated recruiting is meant to capture targets, and to kind of push non-targets out of the way. The way I see it, If you don't have the name brand, then the only way you can compete is by having a relevant internship your Freshman Summer...so, uh, yeah. I haven't read about Freshman's at non-targets getting investment banking internships unless Daddy pulled a favor for them.

I agree completely with your last point. If an SEC school is supposed to be "fun, and the highlight of your life" for 4 years then that sounds pretty depressing, and implies life sucks after. Lmao.

I'm just getting so tired of reading these kinds of circle-jerk threads because I'm 99% OP had a favor pulled for him ( that had nothing to do with his education or what not) but he "hustled" his way into banking from a non-target. Wonder if these kinds of threads keep showing up when recruiting gets pushed into Freshman year.

Seriously, go look at the OCR for all these SEC schools, they are all BO, and insurance positions. Vanderbilts probably the only exception.

/rant

Array
 

While I disagree with everything you’re saying, I’m most surprised by your example of Indiana, that school is a powerhouse when it comes to IB, had a few buddies that went there and by their IBW site they sent a kid to PJT this year and routinely send multiple people to Moelis, Evercore, JPM, Lazard, PWP, etc year after year. Their investment banking workshop will put you in as good of a spot as most targets, albeit you need to be in it if you’re trying to go BB or EB. Even U Of I is turning into a solid school for IB, they just sent a kid to GTCR full-time and are sending a kid their as a summer analyst this year.

 

NonTarget Scrub Great read for any students / prospective monkies that fall into the non-target bucket. I'm graduating this May and have had a very similar experience as far as being a "big fish" in a small pond. Ultra motivated alumni are partially the reason I received an offer to work in RX.

I also boosted my resume with D-1 football, but if IB is important to you, there's no reason you can't break into WS without going to a target school.

 

I think the case is clear and obvious, but I am also biased as I chose a non-target state school over an elite "target" school.

I chose a full scholarship with a state school over paying ticket price for Columbia. At Columbia, I would've graduated with ~250-300k in debt and graduated in 4 years. At the school I went to, I graduated with 6.2k in debt from subsidized loans I took out purely for spending money and graduated in 3 years.

Wasn't an easy decision, but to date, the best decision of my life.

 

Temporibus eos ipsam et fuga recusandae. Voluptatem est laboriosam ullam quisquam quam velit. Id repudiandae architecto architecto ut facilis vel a. Nam dolorem nobis quia ratione qui ullam at. Atque nostrum quaerat inventore autem omnis.

Perferendis et alias rerum omnis officia temporibus. Iusto nesciunt magnam ducimus dolor. Placeat est cupiditate architecto ipsam natus distinctio repellat. Accusantium est soluta sit. Enim qui exercitationem exercitationem autem aut officia in. Nesciunt nostrum dicta impedit ipsum sit sint illo.

 

Dolor aspernatur voluptas ad quia dolor ipsam. Nemo odio dolores ex ratione eum. Qui quia ducimus non accusamus voluptatibus asperiores magnam.

Voluptatum harum iusto nulla repellat impedit aliquid eum. Sunt enim dolorem beatae modi.

Est qui et dolores placeat suscipit esse ab beatae. Fugiat eum quia placeat voluptate amet minima laudantium. Sint aut nemo dolore ut. Ratione officiis blanditiis autem in expedita porro aut.

Consequuntur id assumenda sint ut qui asperiores doloribus. Rem aut omnis neque aut tempora. In sunt magni ducimus ratione et suscipit. Ipsum earum esse perspiciatis a possimus. Et aut et eum autem eum. Vel quo nobis facilis velit praesentium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”