UCLA Anderson vs NYU Stern MBA

Need some thoughts here...

I recently got admitted to UCLA Anderson and NYU Stern FT MBA programs and I need to make a decision in about a month. I am currently in the corporate banking division (within commercial bank) working on syndicated bank debt (credit side). Given my background/interest in debt financing, I want to transition into LevFin and figured MBA is needed to make that happen.

Below are pros and cons for each school that I came up with. I still struggle and go back and forth every min.. Welcome any thoughts and/or advice...

UCLA Pros:
- I already live in LA and the campus is 15 min from Santa Monica.. 340 days of sunshine
- Students are generally more down to earth and nice
- Great alumni base in LA and very strong IB/Finance recruiting in LA
- Cheaper than NYU (both tuition and living expenses)
- Smaller class size with not that many people recruiting for banking = less competition among students

UCLA Cons:
- Long term wise, I eventually want to work abroad (somewhere in Asia) but UCLA is not very well known outside of the U.S. Well... not very well known outside of West Coast
- Less opportunities in LA compared to NYC - not that many LevFin shops in LA compared to NYC
- I love living in LA but finance=NYC?

NYU Pros:
- Overall better brand name than UCLA, especially internationally
- It's NY.. better and more firms to recruit + will likely open more doors down the road
- I've visited NYC many times for both business and vacations and I could totally see myself living there as well

NYU Cons:
- More expensive (tuition is about ~$20k more expensive per year and living expense.. you know.. it's NY)
- Larger student body with more people recruiting for banking jobs
- Compete with other higher ranked schools (Booth/Wharton/Columbia, etc.) for jobs
- Big change for me personally/culturally given I've always lived in the South and West coast

I also got into Cornell but... damn.. after visiting Ithaca.. I can't live there...

 

NYU vastly outperforms UCLA for finance gigs. A couple years back Poets & Quants took a look at which schools do best on Wall Street, based on LinkedIn data. They found that Stern graduates showed up the most at big banks, representing 18% of alumni from top MBAs at these firms. That compares with 12% and 10% for Wharton and Columbia. A mere 3% of these bankers hail from Anderson.

Of course, there are some limitations to this sort of analysis. Stern has a big part-time program which is sure to help. More of the roles could also be back office. But a look at the scale of the difference does away with these concerns. From a recruiting perspective, you're vastly better off at NYU.

 

You can frame it both ways

Remote,distant,slow,boring Or Cheap, tight knit, ivy backbone, Cornell tech if you need

I'm not saying Cornell is better than NYU or not, but it wouldn't be a loser necessarily.

Some can also say, Nyu like MIT has the inferiority complex, but who cares? What works best for you is what gives you the best package for your needs

 
Best Response

UCLA's reputation in Asia is arguably better than its reputation in NY, and NYU's reputation in Asia is probably better than its reputation on the West Coast. Tie.

This is really just a geography vs Leveraged Finance question. You'll get some kind of banking gig on the West Coast from UCLA. But your odds of getting an LF gig are best if you do your job search in NY, and NYU will serve you just fine.

They're both on equal standing overall as schools, but obviously very different experiences - UCLA epitomizes So-Cal life, whereas NYU is in the Village. That said, c'mon - in "My Cousin Vinny", Ralph Macchio's character is going from NYU to UCLA. Same caliber school, different experience.

No right answer because the quality/strengths/weaknesses are really clear, just a matter of your tastes.

The truth is you're the weak. And I'm the tyranny of evil men. But I'm tryin', Ringo. I'm tryin' real hard to be the shepherd.
 

Et eaque voluptates nam consequuntur aliquid. Accusantium veniam similique quaerat eum alias aliquid.

Placeat iste id id veritatis ut ut doloremque distinctio. Earum voluptas tenetur consequatur iusto aliquid laudantium. Et recusandae rerum nam ex enim. Dolor ut consequatur officiis at rerum expedita fuga.

Consequatur consequuntur natus reprehenderit ducimus architecto quaerat aut. Vel est quibusdam aliquam. Voluptas voluptatem eius voluptates id officiis. Cupiditate aliquid quia necessitatibus vel architecto maxime et. Sed neque expedita distinctio et aut modi. Porro aliquid unde sed fuga qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”