Who the fuck is Keith Rubenstein?

So I've been trying to figure out who owns this particular office building in DC that I'm affectionate for, 1801 K Street, and I finally found out - a company called Somerset Partners that I had never heard of.

I was checking out their principals and one of the co-founders is this guy named Keith Rubenstein. Turns out he's a graduate of Widener University Law School who was practicing real estate law and was struggling to the point where he made a deal in 2002 to act as a front to some personal injury practice owned by a non-lawyer, resulting in him getting disbarred.

5 years later his firm was buying 450 Park Ave for $509MM, on top of two other recently-acquired $250MM+ office properties. Now he's trying to transform the south Bronx and is selling his UES mansion for $85 million.

How did he go from a broke struggling lawyer to mogul in just five years? Who the fuck knows. I think he got some money from Russian partners, but it seems pretty sketchy.

Just thought I'd share this with you guys as a living testament to how crazy the world of real estate is.

 

Somerset Partners sold that deal more than a year ago to Mirae and honestly they had been trying to get out of that deal since early 2014. The FED was under contract but walked when the government shut down. But yes his background is crazy. I've heard that he is not the most fun guy to work with. Would be interested to hear where he got his money to buy this up. I am assuming its OPM

 

Sketchy but hey still sounds more legit than World Class Capital lol

I had a flair for languages. But I soon discovered that what talks best is dollars, dinars, drachmas, rubles, rupees and pounds fucking sterling.
 

I don't think you really understand the industry, especially not in 2007, if you're asking this question. The purchase price of whatever asset he's buying has absolutely nothing to do with his net worth, not when banks were giving over 100%+ leverage in some instances and there was a ton of crazy loose equity sloshing around. If you can borrow the full price of an acquisition, then nothing stops a homeless guy from taking a shower, borrowing a nice suit, and buying a $500mm piece of property. He sold that asset for $575mm like 6 years later, meaning that even with a huge amount of leverage he didn't exactly kill it.

Look, as other commentators have pointed out, there are a lot of people who front for other people's capital. Developers who syndicate out all their equity tend to not make a ton of money, since they're often also syndicating out part of their promote as well to make that deal. I don't know a ton about Somerset Partners, but they sound like they are mostly an asset-manager type of company for other's equity - you can make a lot of money that way, but huge real estate fortunes are built from long-term equity ownership.

 
Ozymandia:
I don't think you really understand the industry, especially not in 2007, if you're asking this question. The purchase price of whatever asset he's buying has absolutely nothing to do with his net worth, not when banks were giving over 100%+ leverage in some instances and there was a ton of crazy loose equity sloshing around. If you can borrow the full price of an acquisition, then nothing stops a homeless guy from taking a shower, borrowing a nice suit, and buying a $500mm piece of property. He sold that asset for $575mm like 6 years later, meaning that even with a huge amount of leverage he didn't exactly kill it.

Look, as other commentators have pointed out, there are a lot of people who front for other people's capital. Developers who syndicate out all their equity tend to not make a ton of money, since they're often also syndicating out part of their promote as well to make that deal. I don't know a ton about Somerset Partners, but they sound like they are mostly an asset-manager type of company for other's equity - you can make a lot of money that way, but huge real estate fortunes are built from long-term equity ownership.

totally agree about fronting for OPM but this can't be right about a homeless man borrowing 100% of a $500mn deal cost from a bank... even in '07
 
Ozymandia:
... I was being facetious.
i know you were not being literal, but a huge bank loan would be recourse (presumably even in '07), which means the penniless "front man" would need a big time guarantor. the ability to swing that is something i still have some level of respect for (whether or not i should).
 
prospie:
i know you were not being literal, but a huge bank loan would be recourse (presumably even in '07), which means the penniless "front man" would need a big time guarantor. the ability to swing that is something i still have some level of respect for (whether or not i should).

This is by no means a given. Harry Macklowe (who obviously wasn't a nobody) took $5.8b with only $50mm down to buy the EOP portfolio, and he got that non-recourse.

To take a post-crash example, Raphael Toledano borrowed at over 100% leverage a couple years back despite having little to no net worth and no liquidity, and did it non-recourse (not that it would have mattered).

Getting huge non-recourse loans on asset acquisitions isn't very difficult, you just pay for it. And in a frothy market, developers who are basically gamblers can get those loans and make money.

 
brosephstalin:
LOL yeah, Taledano borrowed from madison realty capital, which is why he lost his assets. And why MRC lent to him in the first place. They knew he was gonna give back the keys (or were banking on it, correctly). The didn't need recourse, the just wanted his portfolio.
yeah i read all about this and i know their money is/was very expensive but

a) i figured he had some sliver of net worth and put a few million cash into the deal and figured it was recourse (but it sounds like the answer to all that is: not necessarily) and

b) he clearly was able to somehow go under contract on this portfolio at a basis that was appealing to Madison. Says a lot. What this means is he probably could've done this with a different source of capital regardless. As easy as it is to make fun of douchebags like him (and I am not defending his douchiness), this is not something a random guy off the street could pull off.

Again, not arguing with anybody here, you guys are speaking the truth, but a guy like Toledano is far more interesting to me than someone who is really good at modeling waterfalls.

 

Yeah but this is the whole point of recourse vs non-recourse loans. Yes, Madison wanted the keys to the property, and yes, they can be classified as loan-to-own lenders, but that doesn't erase the fact that Toledano was able to buy a very expensive set of assets with no track record and no equity in. I'm not arguing the merits of the deal or anything personal about him - I'm making a generic point that you don't need a long history of sponsorship or tons of personal net worth to take crazy loans and basically play roulette, and get massive leverage to do so. I don't know if that is what Keith Rubenstein did, I'm merely saying it is possible.

And his douchiness had nothing to do with why that deal failed - it failed because he didn't understand (like many developers in NYC) that the days of being able to easily evict rent stabilized tenants are over, and that the City and the tenants themselves are paying more attention and are more aware of their rights. It could have been Related or Blackstone trying to execute on that business plan and it would have failed.

 
Best Response
Ozymandia:
Yeah but this is the whole point of recourse vs non-recourse loans. Yes, Madison wanted the keys to the property, and yes, they can be classified as loan-to-own lenders, but that doesn't erase the fact that Toledano was able to buy a very expensive set of assets with no track record and no equity in. I'm not arguing the merits of the deal or anything personal about him - I'm making a generic point that you don't need a long history of sponsorship or tons of personal net worth to take crazy loans and basically play roulette, and get massive leverage to do so. I don't know if that is what Keith Rubenstein did, I'm merely saying it is possible.

And his douchiness had nothing to do with why that deal failed - it failed because he didn't understand (like many developers in NYC) that the days of being able to easily evict rent stabilized tenants are over, and that the City and the tenants themselves are paying more attention and are more aware of their rights. It could have been Related or Blackstone trying to execute on that business plan and it would have failed.

Toledano is related by blood to one of the best brokers in NYC and had completed a few smaller but profitable deals prior to the portfolio purchase. I think it's at best speculation to say he had no equity in as we don't really know how the deal was structured despite the size of the loan. MRC played him like a fiddle. Those guys are good.

There are a lot of guys in NYC that come from very little and work their way into the limelight within a decade. Is JDS Development Group questionable? Stern was buying big deals in his twenties. One difference is that he made them work and in a big way.

 

Enim similique aliquam quia. Omnis et asperiores recusandae nihil voluptatem odit aut. Iusto pariatur ullam et nesciunt.

Et est assumenda tenetur iste et voluptatem. Odit repellat est occaecati consequatur fuga hic delectus. Consectetur et ab vel consequatur. Non repudiandae vitae magni doloribus.

 

Natus at et quis aut doloremque non sit. Nesciunt ad quia labore vitae veniam veritatis. Rem ab quidem eveniet perspiciatis aut earum qui. Omnis eos optio tempore et. Reprehenderit et animi distinctio doloribus temporibus repellat quidem. Esse architecto suscipit quae ducimus hic commodi reprehenderit. Ex vero esse vel sapiente.

Eos ipsam commodi vel. Quasi aut eaque et sed vitae voluptatem numquam. Quidem odit soluta ut eum aut aut nihil.

Similique suscipit at asperiores et velit magnam. Nisi neque atque doloremque omnis quibusdam temporibus. Libero dignissimos autem est aspernatur. Consequatur aut aut nihil neque autem est ab. Quaerat omnis officiis vero explicabo. Aut nihil vel eos pariatur excepturi repudiandae excepturi. Eos aliquid ducimus aspernatur ut.

Aliquid deleniti non et et. Est id exercitationem sapiente voluptas doloribus. Iure beatae totam amet esse vero aut cupiditate.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”