Trending Content
| +23 | Best First Watch to Buy? | 21 | 2d | |
| +19 | Modern Mullet - Acceptable for Intern? | 18 | 2d | |
| +18 | Desperate for Haircut Recommendation in NYC | 9 | 3w | |
| +12 | Upgrading wardrobe for casual wear -- where to shop? | 3 | 2w | |
| +10 | Wardrobe Advice | 4 | 1d | |
| +7 | What should I wear for my PE headshot? | 5 | 2w | |
| +7 | SA Office Wear - Women | 13 | 1w | |
| +7 | Female IB Attire | 6 | 3w | |
| +5 | Most Prestigious Haircuts? | 4 | 1w | |
| +5 | Best place to get a suit in London for around 300 or less? | 4 | 3w |
Career Resources
No, if a candidate walked in with a 3 piece suit for a SA position I would automatically label him a tool in my mind. If you really like the suit just wear it without the vest.
Got it! Thanks @"bearing"!
Second this. While three-piece suits can looking great, it is inappropriate for an entry-level interview.
Never wear anything flashy into an interview. Always be plain.
I think the notions presented on 3 piece suits so far in this topic speak to the insecurities of the interviewer rather than of the interviewee, one way or another. Definitely a flawed analytic thinking process at the least.
They'd have you wear polyester suits from Wal-Mart and intentionally not dress your best just because you are entry level. So sad some people are so insecure of people dressing better than them.
Irregardless of whether the suggestions given thus far can be traced back to insecurity of the interviewer (I doubt that a full-time employee making a significantly higher salary would have much to feel insecure about in terms of clothing quality in comparison to a prospective intern), they are representative of the reality of how an interview is conducted as echoed by innumerable topics here, on other forums, as well as in interview guides. Whether this is a "flawed analytic thinking process" is arguable, however it is a virtually systemic attitude and the simple fact is that they gave the correct advice to the OP.
They also said nothing about "polyester suits from Wal-Mart" which would have a detrimental effect on the candidate's chances as much or more so than wearing the vest. Just sayin'.
The only person I would judge harder than a candidate wearing a vest is one who used the (quasi) word "irregardless".
u would get hot anyway
When people wear a vest, they look like Aladdin.
And the banks are looking more for an Apu...
yes to the vest. it is a necessity
" You want your personality and cognitive capabilities to stand out in an interview, not your attire."
In other words he should wear transparent clothing then. I thought I was doing something wrong.
Still remember the deleted thread where someone was chewed out simply for spending more than the MD for lunch.
I swear, some of you see the systemic assumptions driving the industry as religion and directors as deities. Some eccentric people are needed in order to make sure that all options are considered in a crisis. Maybe the recession could have been avoided if we worried less about 3 piece suits and more about sound analytic process.
What about for Associate interviews/networking events (at b-school)? Still no to vests? 3 piece suits look good.
Where a three piece vest without a shirt and tie. Golden
TotalFratMove
Squared toe shoes, vest and bow tie... and don't forget to keep your personal/ID business cards on your person to network better
NO WAY! You will look completely ridiculous, trying way too hard to look impressive. Let's not forget increased likelihood of sweat stains/odors. Instead, try a single button suit in a lightweight wool in a lighter color--not navy and definitely not black. A white shirt is still a classic and you can wear a lighter colored tie--think SUMMER SMART.
Charcoal grey suit comes to mind
Yes, even a tinge lighter, but def not full on light grey--depending on the suit can come across too slick or too frivolous--a medium grey is good. Also, depending on the person's coloring, features, and personality, can enter into the realm of naturals and beiges, but must be careful on selection--nothing too casual.
Error quam dolorem nesciunt quisquam laudantium qui ipsum laborum. Est repellendus quaerat molestiae sit ut nobis. Eos qui possimus error dolores sint voluptate et iusto. Sit in ut possimus sunt. Natus ex blanditiis eius incidunt. Sit laboriosam et veniam et nihil vel est velit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Dolor ex quaerat nisi corrupti. Unde qui eos optio nihil architecto. Asperiores blanditiis maxime eum soluta natus assumenda voluptas. Totam sint minus est debitis.
Necessitatibus dicta voluptatem laborum sapiente. Tempore suscipit animi rerum id quae est rerum. Dolorem vel optio ratione officia aperiam ea.
Harum delectus architecto alias rerum maiores cumque. Et a praesentium beatae voluptatem. Labore suscipit eligendi atque in. Rerum quod omnis nam reiciendis expedita cumque. Ducimus et rerum quod assumenda totam nulla et. Quia atque asperiores dolor minima cum quae.
Ut et quo accusantium et illo quia. Reiciendis cumque aut aut maxime. Nihil odio sed assumenda quas molestias repudiandae.