Brownfield Investment

What Is A Brownfield Investment?

Brownfield investment (BI) is one kind of foreign direct investment (FDI), in which a business invests in an already-existing facility to launch its operations abroad.

To put it another way, a brownfield investment is the purchase or lease of an existing facility abroad.

A brownfield investment's main objective is to enable a business to enter a foreign market through organizations that are already established there. A business may also make such an investment through mergers or acquisitions.

A corporation or government entity makes a brownfield investment when purchasing or leasing an existing production facility to start operations abroad.

It falls under the foreign direct investment category, an investment made by a company in one country into another country.

Naturally, the fact that the infrastructure is already in place is the investment category's greatest benefit. Thus, it enables businesses to save substantial money and time that would have been otherwise allowed to execute the investment.

It also eliminates the need for utility and building permit paperwork, streamlining the entire process of entering a new market amidst everything else.

But not everything is sunshine and rainbows. Due to harmful substances, pollution, contaminated soil, etc., from previous property use, brownfield land may be left idle or abandoned.

Brownfields put on hold by their owner are frequently referred to as mothballed brownfields. However, compromised sites due to high contamination levels are not considered brownfield properties.

Brownfield Investment and Foreign Direct Investment

Foreign direct investment is a type of investment in which an investor who resides in one country buys a stake in an enterprise located in a foreign country, giving them significant control over its facilities. 

The investor may be a company, government, etc., interested in expanding into new markets.

Companies often look into brownfield investing when they are considering the different options available for foreign direct investment. 

Infrastructure not being used or not used at full capacity offers companies a good, cost-saving alternative compared to building additional production capabilities.

Although a company may need to buy some equipment or alter current equipment, doing so is frequently less expensive than designing and creating a brand-new facility from scratch.

This is even more so when the company investing in the facility intends to use it for activities identical to its previous operations.

Adding new equipment to an existing facility is also considered part of the brownfield investment. However, it is important to note that adding new facilities to finish production is not a part of this investment.

New construction is regarded as greenfield investing instead. We will look more into greenfield investing in the next section.

Brownfield vs. Greenfield Investing

Greenfield, or greenfield investing, is the polar opposite of what we have discussed here till now. It is a foreign direct investment involving building a new facility on previously vacant land.

The term 'greenfield' hints at the idea that the land was green or empty before its development and investment.

Unlike brownfield investments, greenfield investments do not make use of abandoned facilities. Instead, a brand new facility is built for the company to continue its operations.

As expected, it is less environmentally friendly than brownfield investment and is much more costly and time-consuming. However, it does not face the troubles of existing contaminants or hazardous waste due to previous use of toxic substances.

Greenfield sites are also often on the outskirts of towns and cities, with less congestion and more space to expand.

One of the most common reasons a company may choose greenfield investing over brownfield is what accompanies it. 

Before its construction, the facility can be designed to match the specific needs of the company's project, making it much more efficient. 

Working with a pre-existing facility means the company has to modify its requirements based on the existing design. Maintenance costs are much higher for an existing facility than a newly built one.

Examples of brownfield investments

Let us look at the following examples to strengthen our understanding of brownfield investments.

Suppose Terrific Motors, an automobile company based in Malaysia, wishes to expand operations in the United States. But the company's CEO is unsure about the demand for its vehicles in the States.

Further, many legalities are involved in constructing new facilities abroad.

Suppose Terrific Motors acquires an already existing facility in the target country. In that case, it will be able to skip the time-consuming paperwork phase and will only have to invest a little into the infrastructure before getting to know potential buyers.

For this reason, the CEO wishes to make a brownfield investment in the country and better understand the consumers.

Following this decision, Terrific Motors identified a suitable company in the United States that it could acquire. 

It can then purchase the company and expand into the States' market for automobiles at a much faster pace than it would have been able to otherwise.

Real-life Example

Now that we've looked at a hypothetical example, let us consider a real-life example of such an investment.

Vodafone is a London and Newbury-based telecommunications company that acquired a majority stake in India-based Hutchison Essar in a brownfield investment to expand into the subcontinent.

At the time of the acquisition, Hutchison Essar was India's fourth-biggest mobile operator. Vodafone acquired the company in a $10.9 billion all-cash deal.

Following the deal, Vodafone entered the rapidly expanding Indian telecoms market - which was gaining over six million users per month. 

It thus successfully entered the Indian market through an already-established player in the telecommunications industry.

Advantages of a Brownfield Investment

As discussed briefly in other sections, brownfield investments have pros and cons. Therefore, when deciding whether or not to follow through with the investment, a company must carefully consider these.

The advantages of a Brownfield investment are:

1. Quick Market Access and Reduced Administrative Burden: They provide simple and quick access to new markets in other nations compared to greenfield investments, which need to obtain building permits and adhere to other paperwork before commencing operations.
2. Economic Growth and Technology Transfer: They can help improve a country's economy through increased production and capital accumulation and facilitate knowledge and technology transfer across nations.
3. Sustainability and Resource Optimization: Unarguably, these investments are much more sustainable than greenfield investments. They allow previously abandoned factories to be used in a productive manner instead of using more of a country's resources to create new facilities.
4. Lower Fixed Costs and Infrastructure Utilization: Due to the company's decision to use existing infrastructure and facilities rather than establishing new ones, these investments help to lower fixed costs.
5. Skilled Workforce and Reduced Hiring Costs: The facility being acquired probably already has a sufficient number of trained staff, so the corporation won't need to spend as much on hiring or training new employees.
6. Cost Efficiency and Comparisons with Greenfield Investments: Overall, these investments have the potential to be very cost-efficient as compared to greenfield investments.

Disadvantages of a Brownfield Investment

The disadvantages are:

1. Infrastructure Compatibility and Cost Considerations: The corporation may have to spend a lot of money on improvements if the infrastructure is inadequate for the project's needs, dramatically raising the cost of foreign investment.
2. Operational Adaptability and Business Impact: The inability to adapt the facility to the project's requirements could lead to operational inefficiencies that would hurt the company's business in that country.
3.  Geographical Limitations and Expansion Challenges: Geographically, the business can only operate in places with brownfield properties. These areas might be too congested and lack enough room to expand operations.
4. Maintenance and Upkeep Costs of Older Facilities: Older or abandoned facilities may have high maintenance and upkeep costs.
5. Regulatory and Taxation Challenges: Already constructed facilities may also be subject to unforeseen regulatory or taxation issues.
6. Environmental Concerns and Contaminated Land: The land may be contaminated due to the use of dangerous compounds during its previous ownership.

Researched and authored by Rhea Bhatnagar | LinkedIn

Reviewed and Edited by Krupa Jatania I LinkedIn

Free Resources

To continue learning and advancing your career, check out these additional helpful WSO resources:

• Crisis Management
• Demutualization
• Diversification
• Eclectic Paradigm
• Electronic Retailing (E-tailing)