Pegging

A pegged exchange rate, also known as a fixed exchange rate, is a system of exchange rates in which the valuation of a nation's currency is fixed or pegged by a global financial organization.

They are generally backed against the value of another unit of currency, a basket of currencies, or another indicator of worth, such as commodities, precious metals, oil reserves, etc.

A fixed exchange rate is often used to stabilize the exchange rate of a currency. In contrast to a floating exchange regime, this prevents the exchange rate between the currency and its peg from changing in response to market circumstances.

This facilitates and increases predictability in trade and investment between the two currency sectors, which benefits small economies with significant global exchange and high levels of borrowing in foreign currencies.

The nature of a currency may be managed using a fixed exchange rate system by restricting inflation rates. Therefore, the pegged currency is subject to the benchmark value's oversight.

Any banknotes pegged to the benchmark will provide a unit parameter or decline in price compared to other currencies and commodities with which the pegged currency can be exchanged when the parameter changes.

Therefore, the concept of a pegged currency's present worth is determined by its parameter at any set moment.

Understanding Fixed Exchange Rate System

A fixed exchange rate hinders a political establishment from employing domestic monetary policy to achieve macroeconomic stability, according to the Mundell-Fleming model, even in the case of perfect capital flow.

A government's central bank, in a fixed-rate system of exchange rates, typically uses an open market mechanism and is committed at all times to buying and/or selling its currency at a fixed price.

When there is a net demand for international currency from the private sector, the central bank will sell foreign currency from its reserves and purchase back the money supply to keep the right price. Due to this, there is a false demand for native currency, which raises the value of its currency rate.

In contrast, if internal money starts to appreciate, the central bank would purchase it back and inject more local currency into the market, preserving the natural market at the desired stable exchange rate. Major nations' currencies often do not set or bind their exchange rates to other currencies in the twenty-first century.

History

Before many nations adopted the coinage of silver, the gold standard or gold exchange standard with fixed exchange rates predominated between the 1870s through the 1920s.

The period between the two world wars was brief, and after World War II, the Bretton Woods system became the new fixed exchange rate framework.

After World War II, it was established to aid in reconstructing war-torn countries through several infrastructure grants and currency stability initiatives.

The system broke down in the early 1970s and was replaced with a mechanism for fluctuating and setting market prices. Australia and Canada were the following two countries to establish a gold standard, following England in 1821.

With central banks prepared to purchase and sell an infinite amount of gold at the set price, all currencies' external value was determined in terms of gold under this structure.

Every central / reserve bank maintains gold as a monetary authority asset. The Bretton Woods system, from 1944–1973, replaced gold as the designated reserve asset following the Second World War. The regime aimed to combine legally obligatory responsibilities with multilateral decision-making through the International Monetary Fund.

The International Monetary Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development's articles of the agreement include the regulations for this system.

The 44 member nations were supposed to create parity between their national currencies and the U.S. dollar and to keep exchange rates within 1% of parity by interfering in their foreign exchange markets.

The system was designed to regulate currency relations between sovereign governments.

President Richard Nixon stopped the dollar's exchange rate into gold on August 15, 1971, due to worries about the rapidly deteriorating American financial situation and a significant outflow of liquid cash.

The Smithsonian Agreement made it possible for the price of gold to rise from US$35.50 to US$38 per ounce in December 1971. The Bretton Woods system was effectively abolished in March 1973 due to gambling on the dollar that gave rise to autonomous floating.

The Jamaica treaty of 1978 accepted the floating exchange rate, which had been used since March 1973. To counteract short-term volatility in currency prices, countries use their foreign exchange reserves to interfere in the foreign exchange markets. Many believe that the current exchange rate system is a resurgence of Bretton Woods II regulations.

Market Mechanism

A government usually buys or sells its currency on the open market to maintain a set exchange rate.

This is one reason why governments keep foreign currency reserves. The government will sell its currency and purchase fiat exchange if the exchange rate veers too far from the established benchmark rate.

As a result, the value of the currency declines. Additionally, if they purchase the currency it is tied to, the value of that currency will rise in price, bringing the relative worth of the two currencies closer to what was intended.

A government usually buys or sells its currency on the open market to maintain a set exchange rate. This increases market demand and strengthens the local currency, perhaps bringing it back to its original value.

The currency it is tied to may be one of the reserves they sell, in which case its value will decrease. Making it unlawful to exchange money at a rate different than the established one is another less common method of maintaining a fixed exchange rate.

Since it is hard to police, there is sometimes an underground market for foreign currency. Unfortunately, due to government monopolies on all currency exchanges, certain nations successfully utilized this strategy.

Gold Standard Monetary Systems

A financial model that utilizes a set amount of gold as the basis for the market-based currency unit is known as a gold standard.

The Bretton Woods system was based on the gold standard from the 1870s to the early 1920s, from the late 1920s to 1932, and from 1944 to 1971, when the United States arbitrarily ended the U.S. dollar exchange rate to gold for international banks.

Before the 18th century, no financial model existed that used gold and other precious metals as their only form of payment and measurement of value.

The true bedrock of the financial system for ages was silver, not gold. As a result, silver served as the basis for the majority of funding systems, the payment of wages and salaries, and the majority of local retail commerce.

Due to several obstacles that could only be overcome by instruments developed in the 19th century, gold could not operate as money and a unit of account for daily purchases.

Due to its compact size and scarcity, gold was not widely used as money. For the highest-paid laborers, a dime-sized ducat weighing 3.4 grams was equivalent to seven days of pay.

Silver was more valuable as money and a unit of account since coins and billions of poor-quality silver quickly matched up to workforce expenditures and grocery expenditures. Without any conversion clauses into specie, a small change was issued at virtually its total intrinsic value.

People from the pre-manufacturing age had a negative reputation for tokens with little inherent worth since they were simple to counterfeit and were thought to be a sign of monetary deflation.

Some forms of financial repression are prohibited under a gold standard. But, particularly for the governments who engage in it, external debt is a wealth transfer from creditors to debtors. When depreciation is present, fiscal decentralization, a kind of levy, is most effective at lowering debt.

The gold standard has been praised for its long-term price stability, but historical evidence reveals that short-term price movements were much more significant under the gold standard.

According to economic experts, expanding the money supply during economic downturns can significantly reduce the severity of market corrections. With a gold standard, the money supply could no longer be employed to stabilize the economy since the reserves of gold would govern the money supply.

Merits of Pegging

The following points are the merits of a fixed foreign exchange rate system:

• A fixed exchange rate may minimize instabilities in real economic activity. In addition, central banks may gain confidence by fixing their nation's currency with that of a more orderly country.
• A nation with underdeveloped or unliquid money markets may set its exchange rates to offer its citizens access to a synthetic money market with the stability of the nation that issues foreign cash.
• The instability and variability in comparable prices are lessened with a set exchange rate. Lowering related uncertainty eliminates exchange rate risk. It requires the banking system to be disciplined. As a result, a country's ability to trade and invest internationally is improved.
• Since speculation in the currency markets does not exaggerate swings brought on by market cycles, it is expected to be less unstable under a fixed regime of exchange rates than it is under a dynamic one.
• Countries with more excellent inflation rates than the rest of the world are forced to maintain market control by fixed exchange rates because they are more likely to have ongoing public finances deficits and capital depletion in such countries.
• Fixed exchange rates limit the issuance of debt and the backing of government spending with debt that the monetary authorities purchase, lowering currency depreciation.

Demerits of Pegging

The following points are the demerits of a fixed foreign exchange rate system:

• The idea that variable exchange rates can help to rebalance trade is one of the critical arguments against fixed exchange rates.
• With a floating exchange rate, there will be greater demand for foreign currency than local currency when there is a trade imbalance, which will raise the cost of the international currency relative to the local currency.
• The price of imported goods becomes less alluring to the home market, lowering the trade imbalance.
• This automatic rebalancing does not take place in the case of fixed exchange rates.
• The risk of the central bank running out of foreign exchange reserves while attempting to maintain the peg if demand for foreign reserves outweighs supply is another significant drawback of a fixed-exchange-rate system.
• A financial collapse or public finances crisis occurs, and the central bank is forced to depreciate the currency.
• Private-sector actors will attempt to protect themselves when there is a chance that this could happen by holding more foreign and less local currency, which has the consequence of raising the possibility that forced devaluation will occur.
• The exchange rate will be altered more by a forced depreciation than by daily changes in a flexible exchange system.
• When an exchange rate is fixed rather than dynamic, jurisdiction is limited in how it may implement economic and financial policy.
• By lowering taxes and pumping more money into the market, the government risks creating a trade deficit while deploying reflationary instruments to boost economic growth.
• This might happen if the spending power of the average household rises along with currency depreciation, leaving imports relatively less expensive.
• When there is a trade imbalance, a nation adamant about maintaining a fixed exchange rate will be forced to take deflationary policies, such as more taxes and less money available, which might result in poverty due to employment.
• Because of this, other nations with a fixed exchange rate may also respond if a given nation uses its currency to protect its exchange rate.
• With the development of sophisticated financial instruments and derivatives in recent years, which enable businesses to hedge exchange rate volatility, the requirement for a stable exchange rate system has been tested.
• There may be excess demand or supply if the published exchange rate differs from the market equilibrium exchange rate.
• To adjust and maintain exchange rates and absorb excess demand or supply, the central bank must always keep stockpiles of both foreign and local currencies.
• Since the currency cannot gain or depreciate according to market conditions, fixed exchange rates need not permit the systematic repair of shortfalls in the country's payments balance.
• It fails to determine the extent of the country's comparative advantage or disadvantage and might result in an ineffective distribution of resources globally.
• To achieve external balance, policy delays and errors are a concern. 
• The forex market is forced to pay the price for state intervention. 
• It does not function effectively in nations with diverse economies and, thus, economic shocks.

Researched & Authored by Aviral Mathur I LinkedIn

Free Resources

To continue learning and advancing your career, check out these additional helpful WSO resources:

• Put Option
• Quantitative Trading
• Rally
• Realized Gain
• Relative Strenght Index (RSI)