• Sharebar

I transferred my freshman year from a non-target school with a 3.8 to another non-target school and graduated in May of 2011. My GPA at the school I graduated from did not account for my first year, nor any summer classes I took at different universities, leading to a lower 'final GPA.'

Presently on my resume, I have listed my two schools and a "Cumulative GPA" correctly weighting both GPAs together. Is this considered lying or dishonest? Will firms only look at my graduating school transcript and see that it is lower than what I have listed on my resume? I am not trying to lie about my grades but my final school GPA does not accurately reflect all four years of my college career. Can anyone offer any advice regarding the correct way to accurately display my highest possible GPA??

Thank you for all the help.

Comments (13)

  • captainkoolaid's picture

    As am I...

    Disclaimer for the Kids: Any forward-looking statements are solely for informational purposes and cannot be taken as investment advice. Consult your moms before deciding where to invest.

  • In reply to Bernankey
    turtle's picture

    Bernankey wrote:
    Its basically lying. You didnt graduate from the school where you went your freshman year.

    Definitely not lying. You earned those grades, doesn't matter if you graduated or not. With this philosophy then if you got a 1.7 freshman year then you can just totally cancel that out?

    "If you survive to my age and you rack up a CV like mine, you can look at HR and say, "Fuck you. I don't try out."- Eddie

  • In reply to turtle
    Bernankey's picture

    turtle wrote:
    Bernankey wrote:
    Its basically lying. You didnt graduate from the school where you went your freshman year.

    Definitely not lying. You earned those grades, doesn't matter if you graduated or not. With this philosophy then if you got a 1.7 freshman year then you can just totally cancel that out?

    With your philosophy can I go to a community college during the summer, get a 4.0, and then weight my GPA to reflect the scores I got there despite my school not accepting them?

  • Sport1's picture

    It sounds like it might just come down to the individual interviewer, mood he or she is in, and/or receptiveness to my situation that particular day. I am aware of both sides of the story (i.e. turtle v bernankey), and at the end of the day simply do not want to get caught "lying" because that will for sure kill my chances at any opportunity.

    Should I just list both schools, the respective GPA's, and then at the top make a "Cumulative GPA" line? I agree with Banan and Rupert regarding my reasoning. I also transferred to a more difficult school (still non-target) and was a collegiate athlete all four years as well, if that makes any difference.

    Thank you for the advice everyone

  • In reply to Bernankey
    turtle's picture

    Bernankey wrote:
    turtle wrote:
    Bernankey wrote:
    Its basically lying. You didnt graduate from the school where you went your freshman year.

    Definitely not lying. You earned those grades, doesn't matter if you graduated or not. With this philosophy then if you got a 1.7 freshman year then you can just totally cancel that out?

    With your philosophy can I go to a community college during the summer, get a 4.0, and then weight my GPA to reflect the scores I got there despite my school not accepting them?

    CC was not mentioned (whole different thing) and I am assuming that when he means calculating the GPA he is not adding both GPAs and dividing it by 2. If he adds his freshman grades to the other 3 years grades and calculates the GPA that way then he isn't lying, sure it might not be the most valid way to do it but you have an explanation.

    "If you survive to my age and you rack up a CV like mine, you can look at HR and say, "Fuck you. I don't try out."- Eddie