Trending Content - Off Topic Forum
| +36 | Are we doomed with this debt? | 34 | 3m |
| +25 | Girlfriend found my UBS badge. I told her I was cheating. | 3 | 1h |
| +6 | Honeymoon Length | 6 | 20h |
| +3 | I am in paradise | 2 | 23h |
Career Resources
WSO Free Modeling Series - Now Open Through
November 30, 2026
9 Free Financial Modeling Lessons
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
High Finance Applications
Guaranteed
Get at least one offer GUARANTEED
- 1:1 support
- 92% success rate
- 2,000+ mentor network
- Unlimited Live bootcamps
- AI for resume + LinkedIn
- Networking automation tools
- HireVue simulation tool
- Full course library
- Private Slack community
- 20hrs of mocks
- + much more...
Was under the impression that EV uses market cap which is different than SH equity?
after looking at calculating EV, Market Cap and Firm Value the way described above I don't think I will ever need a reference book to know which is which...great post
as always, well done.
Meaningless for high growth companies.
M&A Question - Market cap or ev as valuation tool (Originally Posted: 07/07/2011)
Hi I have a quick question on public companies and whether I should be using market cap or ev as a valuation tool. For example Company A wants to acquire Company B Company B Mkt Cap is 50 M EV: 75M To acquire the company (premium aside) will company A need to pay 50 or 75M. Does the debt outstanding carry over or does it have to be paid down immediatley.
What happens if the MKT is really low do to high amounts of cash?
Depends on the debt. Sometimes it will have to be taken out, other times it can be left in place.
"What happens if the MKT is really low do to high amounts of cash?"
Not sure what this means.
What happens if MKT CAP is really low due to cash on hand? IE If Company B's EV is 30M. But MKT CAP is 50M? Does Company A pay 30M or 50M?
-I don't think market cap has anything to do with the amount of cash on a firm's book...unless you're saying that the OPMI market is somehow less interested in the firm b/c of this and they its price is depressed, so market cap being simply shares outstanding x current market price would be low... yielding a low market cap valuation
-I think what you're actually getting at has to do with confusion over the Enterprise Value calculation which is: Market Cap (shares outstanding x current price) + Debt + Preferred - Cash & Cash Equivalents
-It's not that the market cap is low in this case its that EV since you don't want to count cash is less
-So keeping in mind what EV and what Market Cap each represent I'm fairly certain you would pay for EV * Premium in order to get shareholder's to participate from this valuation you can back out of EV * Premium to get Equity Value and then divide by Shares Outstanding to get what you would offer per share based on your valuation...
-Hope this helps, someone correct me if I'm wrong; don't want to sound like an arrogant prick if I am.
Deleted. Sorry didn't read the above post.
I think when we do the M&A valuation, we usually use EV/EBITDA. While if we just value whether we should buy the stock or not, we only care market cap as it just represents the equity part. Other than EV/EBITDA, we shd also look at the net debt position when we finalise the acquisition price of the target.
Equity Price is the price you pay to buy the company.
Think of it like if you wanted to buy the company; you would go to the market and buy stock @ the current stock price.
Now, the difference is that if you are trying to acquire 100% of the company you will have to pay a premium so that current shareholders will sell all their shares to you.
Equity Price is the price you pay to buy the company.
Think of it like if you wanted to buy the company; you would go to the market and buy stock @ the current stock price.
Now, the difference is that if you are trying to acquire 100% of the company you will have to pay a premium so that current shareholders will sell all their shares to you.
Market Cap. and Enterprise Value (Originally Posted: 08/14/2009)
If enterprise value is the true measurement of a firm's value, why do so many reports / investors quote market capitaliation as the correct metric for firm value and size?
Why is market capitalization ever a relevant metric in itself? Shouldn't we always look at enterprise value to measure the relative size of a company?
Total Enterprise Value is at its most important for M&A transactions and can take a little extra legwork to solve (need the debt and cash balances as well). Not that this legwork is really that time-consuming, but mark. cap. is just a quick and easy way to get things done. Plus, certain financial ratios need the market cap rather than TEV.
Right, but if market cap ALWAYS (unless the firm has no debt or cash) misstates the true value of a firm, I just don't understand why it is so widely used.
Simplicity alone shouldn't justify using it as the lone metric of value.
Enterprise value is not accurate if you are a shareholder. Market cap is simply the value of all common shares (shares X price). Market cap is the true value of the EQUITY portion of the firm. EV is theoretically the true value of the ENTIRE firm, but that does not matter because as a share holder you are only entitled to the equity portion.
Enterprise value is essentially the value to ALL STAKEHOLDERS of the firm. Equity Value/Market Cap is the value of common equity. In order to acquire CONTROL of a firm, you need control of a majority of common equity.
But aren't shareholders the ones who should care about enterprise value since, as residual claimholders, they need to take into account the amount of debt that their company carries.
It appears to me that only looking at market cap as a shareholder can be misleading if the company also carries a large burden of debt.
Even in M&A situations, where looking at enterprise value is common, the buyer technically becomes the majority shareholder.
I do agree that EV is usually more important. Most of the situations I've seen, in order to fully acquire a company, debt covenants require that all debt must be 'taken out.'
There are also situations where companies have nominal amounts of debt and it makes more sense to focus on market cap.
Market Cap vs Enterprise Value (Originally Posted: 01/19/2013)
When do you become concerned with a negative enterprise value?
Enterprise value = EV + Debt + Preferred Stock + NCI - Cash (this is not all inclusive but covers the most common components of enterprise value)
You can have a negative enterprise value if cash is high relative to the other components of enterprise value. Most notably, a company with significant cash and an extremely low equity value (highly unusual) for obvious reasons).
Equity value cannot be less than 0 because a stock price has a zero bound.
Debt, PS and NCI must be 0 or a positive number.
How does a change in share price affect EV, P/E, and Market Cap? (Originally Posted: 11/24/2012)
Hey,
I am not a finance major but I am prepping for some standard questions and wanted to double check.
If I was asked:
How does a share price drop of 10% affect a) Enterprise Value, b) P/E, c) Market Cap?
a) It reduces Enterprise Value b) Lowers P/E c) Obviosuly reduces market cap by 10%
Am I correct here and can I be more precise with my answers?
Thank you
This requires high school-level addition, multiplication, and division. Do you really need to post here to be sure?
WSO Wall of Shame (WOS) worthy.
If I were the interviewer, I would expect an explanation demonstrating that you know what EV, P/E, and market cap are. Why do you believe EV would go down? Why do you think P/E would go down? Why is it that market cap would go down?
P.S. Never say obviously. If you're right, it makes you sound arrogant or like you're trying too hard. If you're wrong, it destroys your credibility. I've heard a lot of stupid statements coming along with the word "obviously".
man, this dude wack as fvck.
be nice guys
Accusamus debitis nostrum nam voluptatibus sit. Vel soluta neque quo sit. Ducimus consequatur aspernatur ratione in aut dolorum. Asperiores qui autem odio nemo voluptate earum sint sed. Sit placeat incidunt excepturi omnis esse.
Recusandae excepturi qui qui nobis. Quaerat quos fugit ab ex aut placeat eligendi. Vero occaecati animi rerum quo repellendus quod alias.
Sit quam ipsum molestias ipsa. Quia et ullam at dolores exercitationem voluptatem. Molestiae quod ut nam aut perferendis. Quo quasi dolorum voluptates.
Ab sunt et adipisci. Molestias ut hic maiores ipsum assumenda ipsum. Adipisci voluptas et et rem dolores nisi maxime. Enim quis neque voluptatem optio ipsa suscipit. Recusandae voluptas consequatur dolor consequuntur fuga voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Eos porro magnam ab quia quasi reprehenderit molestiae. Voluptate dolorum eum fugit sapiente tempora a dolor et. Magni praesentium eos quo dolores blanditiis eveniet. Temporibus consequatur rerum deleniti a quae repellendus. Labore minus tenetur porro consequuntur blanditiis.
Doloremque eligendi dolorem iste non. Quidem et asperiores consequuntur impedit provident cumque aut. Dolorem ea incidunt adipisci incidunt nesciunt cupiditate aliquid. Quidem voluptatem labore eius in voluptas distinctio porro. Nesciunt cupiditate reiciendis quas sed consequatur ex. Laudantium et odio reprehenderit sed id dolores sit itaque.
Quo alias id saepe aspernatur repudiandae porro et. Neque maiores impedit tempore nihil. Sunt sed aut ut et labore.
Dolores cumque id excepturi. Qui corporis nam ut odio sit consectetur omnis. Alias quia cumque qui id ut vel nihil. Magnam sit vel facere sed ipsam voluptas perferendis. Minus consequatur voluptates consectetur similique.