Bitcoin: 'Digital Gold' vs 'Highly Speculative Asset'
According to Financial Times
- 'The Market Cap of Bitcoin makes no sense, supply and price do not reflect what they claim to.'
- 'Monday 4th sell of, 17% drop, only 150 Bitcoins were sold (according to crypto critics, but very doubtful in my opinion).'
- 'Inelastic supply, high volatility, no fundamentals... but increasing institutional adoption - JPM long-term price target: $146,000'
Do you agree/disagree with these points? What is your long-term opinion?
Hi mp_cfa, yes, I'm a bot, but I'm also good looking. Hopefully, these threads help you:
More suggestions...
You're welcome.
It’s a difficult asset to value because it is so different. ARK have written some interesting articles and papers about ways to think of BTC from a different angle that might be of interest: https://ark-invest.com/articles/analyst-research/on-chain-data-bitcoin/
From my point of view, it is a speculative asset. One use case it seems to have is crowd sourced fundraising. It will be interesting to see if the transparency/security aspect can create some use cases (eg supply chain traceability).
Natus vel nisi ut aut aliquid sed iure ut. Esse ab corporis rerum ducimus. Eos dolorem voluptatem optio. Error error sunt aut exercitationem. Sint distinctio aspernatur quod vel cupiditate voluptas.
Debitis id est nihil aut deserunt praesentium. Incidunt recusandae soluta similique. Dolorem veritatis et aut facilis suscipit ducimus voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...