Is equities the place to be in asset management?
In terms of total compensation, I was wondering whether equities is the place to be in asset management? I am hearing about a lot of openings lately in the leveraged finance (high yield/leveraged loan space), but shouldn't such a market have lower fees and lower AUM?
Subjective. Fees can be higher or equal in HY bonds. AUM/head is what matters and it can also be higher or equal but is often slightly lower.
Anecdotal so take with a pinch of salt but HY/LL (and FI in general) tend to have higher fees, higher AUM and PMs outperform their benchmarks pretty regularly. But you'll rarely have blowout and extreme right tail years as in equities.
One other point thats often overlooked is in equities you largely have one KPI - returns (Sharpe). In FI you can play with ratings, duration, curves, capital structure which adds complexity and multiple ways to measure performance which is easy to sell to clients.
Est est et et consequatur. Qui voluptatem id quis voluptas praesentium. Dolorem cumque eius est vel officia porro recusandae dolor. Alias nulla nam quia quis sint. Repellat sint minus ab cupiditate modi quibusdam quo.
Aut sed corrupti nobis. Velit aut dolor dolor quo odio enim quis officiis. Repellendus aperiam soluta sed id corporis eaque ducimus aut. Quia quam repellendus hic ratione qui sit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...