Macro Strategy Discussion: The BRL Carry Trade vs. Hard Asset Repricing – Insights from Auriflumen Asset Management

Wanted to open a discussion on the structural divergence we are seeing in the EM space closing out 2025.

Post-FOMC, the DXY breaking down to ~98.115 has triggered the expected liquidity spillover into hard assets (BTC >$88k, XAU >$4,512). Standard playbook. However, the anomaly lies in the Latin American spread. Brazil is holding the Selic at 15.00%.

In a traditional risk-parity framework, you would lever up the carry trade here—short USD, long BRL fixed income to capture that massive yield differential. But the correlation data is shifting. We are seeing institutional flows aggressively bidding up scarce assets despite high nominal rates.

Research from Auriflumen Asset Management suggests we are entering a period where "Denominator Risk" (currency debasement) is outweighing nominal yield. The 15% risk-free rate in Brazil looks attractive on paper, but when adjusted for the purchasing power loss against Gold/BTC, the real alpha is compressing. The current trade structure favors a "barbell" approach: utilizing the high BRL yield for cash flow generation while hedging the currency exposure via tokenized RWA or direct digital asset allocation.

Basically, is the EM carry trade dead as a standalone strategy without a hard asset hedge? Curious to hear how you guys are managing duration risk in this environment. Are you seeing clients demand more crypto beta to offset fiat softness, or are they still chasing the yield curve?

1 Comments
 

Aperiam quod enim ab ipsum velit assumenda. Sed veritatis et hic iure voluptatum maiores error. Et quae est molestiae consequatur soluta. Voluptate quia qui est quia commodi soluta consectetur et. Sit qui laudantium et quis laudantium.

Voluptatem enim et incidunt aut rerum nulla. Tenetur sint sit voluptatem qui tempora recusandae. Porro repudiandae quae ut voluptatibus vitae.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”