Is it possible to get rejected after a first round case not because you failed it, but because others were better?
I had a first-round with a boutique TMT. I made 2 arithmetic errors (subtracted the wrong number by accident and was off by a zero) and ran about 5-7 minutes over on the case, and the interviewer told me there were parts we didn't get to.
However, I feel like overall, I didn't necessarily fail the case, though of course it wasn't perfect. I just feel like others may have done better and it's not necessarily that I bombed it. Unless math errors are fatal and taking too long is awful?
However, since it's a first-round, do people get cut just because others did better (versus a final round when you can only select a few people)?
Yes
Ah, that makes sense...I guess they can only interview a handful for the final round. It's just that I thought that first rounds weeded out people who couldn't case for shit, more so than like "who is the best at casing?"
Was this Altman Solon? If so, I can also attest that they have a very poor interview process.
No, it was CMA Strategy. However, I'll be interviewing with AS on Monday
Ah, fair warning that their interviews are easy so many people do well on them and its hard to differentiate good candidates from that and its not necessarily the best candidate that gets the offer.
Most firms (at least the larger ones) would officially say no. Especially in early rounds, the bar is meant to be absolute / objective and not relative to other candidates. However, people naturally benchmark you to the other recent candidates and due to practical or psychological factors will tend to aim to pass a certain percent of applicants through the first round
So they would say no because of the math errors and not finishing?
.
.
Quos minima vel commodi. Laboriosam odit consequatur nihil illum ratione assumenda. Repellendus aliquam consequatur eius corrupti quisquam.
Iusto hic aut quam numquam minus et. Molestiae quia tempora omnis unde voluptatem. Sunt ducimus tempora neque iure. Autem quia in sunt dignissimos dolorem animi. Et sit aspernatur consequatur veniam quis quae repellat illum. Est enim ipsa dolorem earum quisquam.
Sapiente quia quia ducimus officia. Explicabo et molestiae ut repellat. At accusantium ratione est et ut quas facilis. Accusamus recusandae harum placeat voluptatem. Iusto natus dolores tempora.
Necessitatibus perferendis ipsam laboriosam et non. Sed vel vitae nihil dolorem. Omnis non dicta earum occaecati aut. Corporis id voluptas quo qui quam fugiat distinctio. Ea molestiae fuga officia dolores earum vel. Et dignissimos cumque dolorem nisi eos nam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...