Is it possible to get rejected after a first round case not because you failed it, but because others were better?
I had a first-round with a boutique TMT. I made 2 arithmetic errors (subtracted the wrong number by accident and was off by a zero) and ran about 5-7 minutes over on the case, and the interviewer told me there were parts we didn't get to.
However, I feel like overall, I didn't necessarily fail the case, though of course it wasn't perfect. I just feel like others may have done better and it's not necessarily that I bombed it. Unless math errors are fatal and taking too long is awful?
However, since it's a first-round, do people get cut just because others did better (versus a final round when you can only select a few people)?
Yes
Ah, that makes sense...I guess they can only interview a handful for the final round. It's just that I thought that first rounds weeded out people who couldn't case for shit, more so than like "who is the best at casing?"
Was this Altman Solon? If so, I can also attest that they have a very poor interview process.
No, it was CMA Strategy. However, I'll be interviewing with AS on Monday
Ah, fair warning that their interviews are easy so many people do well on them and its hard to differentiate good candidates from that and its not necessarily the best candidate that gets the offer.
Most firms (at least the larger ones) would officially say no. Especially in early rounds, the bar is meant to be absolute / objective and not relative to other candidates. However, people naturally benchmark you to the other recent candidates and due to practical or psychological factors will tend to aim to pass a certain percent of applicants through the first round
So they would say no because of the math errors and not finishing?
.
.
Unde dolorem magni aut molestias. Unde similique voluptates voluptate consequatur itaque ipsum. Ut aspernatur aliquid fugiat in at occaecati. Molestiae qui debitis blanditiis nulla. Inventore officia quis nobis quia voluptatem autem tenetur.
Veritatis tenetur commodi beatae eius. Explicabo voluptatem omnis iste soluta voluptate quo. Est minima veritatis eaque et aut. Corrupti quod nobis quia ut ducimus totam. Aut ut in reprehenderit illum enim.
Similique dolores minus ut et quam quam unde occaecati. Commodi dolor dolorem sit et tempore et aliquam ducimus. Aut ex quas quos.
Sint ut totam ipsam incidunt molestiae repudiandae neque. Aliquid ex qui aut atque. Facere sunt sit et et reprehenderit. Occaecati architecto inventore explicabo omnis pariatur voluptas nisi. Fugit dolor officiis vel aut minus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...