Jan 12, 2024

What does “cyclicality would de-rate relative to certainty” mean?

Hi, student here. I have a question about today’s article of the Unhedged newsletter that FT puts out. In the article, which interviews Albert Edwards and his ice age thesis, Edwards says:

“The Japanification of the US and Europe was basically like the secular stagnation thesis. In financial markets, cyclicality would de-rate relative to certainty. So equities would underperform government bonds. We’d reach the stage in the economic cycle where the traditional correlation between bonds and equities would break down. As inflation got lower, what you might call the Abby Cohen thesis said that lower bond yields are great for equities because the P/E ratio will go up forever. But we thought that eventually, as you got down to sub-2 per cent inflation and bond yields fell further, the “P” would start coming down. That’s what happened in Japan.”

I have two questions: what does “cyclicality would de-rate relative to certainty” mean? And why would stock prices fall if if bond yields fall too far? I understand that decreased bones yields would make equities more attractive to investors, so why would there be a fall in stock prices? However

2 Comments
 

Ah, diving into the deep end of financial theory, are we? Let's break this down:

  1. Cyclicality would de-rate relative to certainty:

    • "Cyclicality" refers to the natural ups and downs in the economy and financial markets. Industries and companies that are cyclical tend to perform well when the economy is booming and poorly during downturns.
    • "De-rate" in this context means to reduce the relative value or rating of something.
    • "Certainty" here is likely referring to investments that have more predictable outcomes or less volatility, such as government bonds.
    • So, when Edwards says "cyclicality would de-rate relative to certainty," he's suggesting that in the market environment he's describing, investors would place a lower value on cyclical equities (stocks) compared to more certain and stable investments like government bonds. This is because the predictability of returns becomes more prized in a stagnating economy, which is what he means by "Japanification" – a reference to Japan's long period of economic stagnation.
  2. Why would stock prices fall if bond yields fall too far?

    • Typically, lower bond yields can make stocks more attractive, as you've noted, because they reduce the relative appeal of bonds and can lead to a higher present value of future cash flows from equities, thus increasing their price/earnings (P/E) ratios.
    • However, if bond yields fall too far, particularly to very low levels, it can signal that investors expect economic growth to be very low or stagnant. This expectation of low growth can lead to a decrease in corporate earnings forecasts, which in turn can reduce the "P" or price in the P/E ratio, even if the "E" or earnings remain constant.
    • Additionally, extremely low bond yields might suggest that central banks are concerned about deflation or economic contraction, which are not good signs for corporate profitability and can lead to a reevaluation of the risk associated with equities, potentially leading to a fall in stock prices.

Remember, in the world of finance, the relationship between different asset classes can be complex and counterintuitive, depending on the broader economic context. It's like trying to predict where the banana peel will be on the sidewalk of the market – sometimes it's right in front of you, and other times it's nowhere to be seen. Keep studying and you'll get the hang of these slippery concepts!

Sources: A Decade Into IB: Teetering on the Edge of Cataclysm?, Bulls vs. Bears in 2018, The ‘Business Cycle’ framework, Will robots replace your consulting or financial career?, DCF Modeling Course ~ Pre-training text.pdf

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Cupiditate ut animi minima. Alias totam ut nam necessitatibus voluptatem nihil quidem quo. Unde omnis ratione quae omnis. Hic illum molestiae et architecto sequi. Velit quas ut nostrum asperiores et pariatur dignissimos laudantium. Ab qui ipsa laudantium quos ut earum. Vel dolorem sequi assumenda magnam ad.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”