Difference in reported CFO line items vs. calculated corresponding B/S change help?

Can anyone explain to me why a CFO line item (or any SCF line item) may not reflect the same number as I calculate from the balance sheet for a corresponding line item?

I'm working on modeling Starbucks and a number of working capital and non-cash items do not match what is reported on the B/S or I/S.

A few of SBUX Working Capital: 2014 2013 Calculated change CFO reported A/R 631 561.4 (69.6) (79.7) Inventory 1090.9 1111.2 20.3 14.3 D&A 709.6 621.4 N/A 748.4, 655.6 for 2013 and 2014, respectively

What gives? Can't find any explanation in the 10k either.

7 Comments
 

It's pretty common for it not to tie up perfectly. For example, if a company sells some PP&E it won't appear in D&A, instead appearing in cash flow from investing. Also, you might have some accounts receivable written off, which would be added back elsewhere in the cash flow from operations statement. I believe you can also have foreign exchange differences. The list is endless but usually isn't material.

 

Blanditiis occaecati tempore sunt nobis nihil. Cupiditate neque quisquam amet modi praesentium est. Saepe sed similique nostrum accusantium nisi voluptatem qui. Est minus incidunt nostrum quae enim odio. Quis vero dolores iste iusto eveniet omnis sed.

Eius quae sit distinctio ea. Non ab ullam dolores nisi dolor ducimus quae. Est voluptates officiis sequi. Error corrupti odit cumque voluptas velit voluptatem rem.

Accusantium doloribus aut nemo pariatur et et iste. Impedit id error odit autem ut perferendis dolores.

Laudantium velit sed repellat quia perspiciatis. Dolorum qui accusamus autem cupiditate. Consectetur et quisquam id veniam adipisci. Laborum est in aperiam fugiat aut sint.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”