Juniorization of the industry

Hey everyone,

I've noticed an interesting trend in the industry over the past five years: a significant 'juniorization' of the ranks, especially at bulge bracket banks. Through discussions with clients and colleagues, it's clear that cost pressures may be leading banks to reduce senior hires and fill positions with junior staff instead.

Traditionally, VP and above levels were the main covering analysts, with occasional exceptions for small to mid-cap names. However, I've observed that many associates are now acting as covering analysts. While more experience doesn't necessarily make for a better covering analyst, the expectation is to follow industries and companies closely over time, which is a comparative advantage. It's intriguing to see such a shift towards junior team members in these roles.

For context, our corporate title structure is typically:

  • MD
  • Director
  • VP/Associate Director
  • Associate
  • Analyst

I'm curious, has anyone else on this forum noticed a similar trend?

16 Comments
 

For obvious reasons, I cannot name individuals. But if you pulled up analyst coverage (ANR) on Bloomberg you can cross reference the covering analyst's name with their LinkedIn profile. For reference, I am the consumer sector covering both US/Europe stocks and I have noticed a substantial portion of junior employees covering in my sector.

 

ER is absolutely juniorizing and asking teams to do more with less. In one of the less sexy sectors of TMT that I'm familiar with, there were three II-ranked analysts exiting to IR/PE CFO in the last year and all were replaced with their most senior associate. When I joined, the sector had ~10 lead analysts who were 20 year veterans; 2 are left and the other 8 have all moved on. It's not the sexiest sector, but it's middle of the pack, not the basement.

Coverage expectations have drifted up from 6-8 to 10 names per head in the 6 years I've been around.

Trading, sales and specialist sales are juniorizing too. You see it across the board.

And can it ever be?
 
Most Helpful

When I was at bulge bank a few years ago, they were making a push for juniors to cover small cap names as a way to broaden coverage and cover more names with similar resources. Had I stayed, would've gotten my own coverage soon. Also gives them a chance to see if they have senior analyst talent or not. Helps with retention of juniors as well. It's hard to be a junior in this seat knowing that after you've been there a few years, you basically are capped on upside until your boss retires or leaves. Giving them small coverage with opportunity to grow it slowly helps solve that. Have seen some people take senior role when he leaves for this reason.

But isn't part of this natural? Business is under pressure and so if a few of these 20-30 yr. vets retire or move to other pastures, someone has to replace them. Only so many people with that much experience in the industry. Only so many juniors that have the "IT" soft skills to be a good senior analyst on sell-side, why not give them a shot.  

 

But is this how the juniorization is actually happening? I agree that this business model makes a ton of sense. But is this actually what the juniorification of the business is? Or are there other, larger, issues at play? Like could this be true but more of the juniors covering names are covering mid-cap companies and above? 

I am not an ER/HF/etc person so I have literally zero insight into who is covering what. Which is why I am asking

 

I’m at a regional MM bank and there’s virtually no junior coverage, almost every sr covering analyst has been covering the space for 15-20+ years and many (not all) associates are not realistically given a shot at coverage until they are 6-7 years in as an associate, and then it’s only a couple names to begin. Most of the current long tenured senior analysts ironically were given coverage 2-3 years into their careers back in the day.

 

how is pay at your shop? Probably less pressure to push coverage down at MMs where typically the pay is lower, but that's broad strokes and may not be true where you are

And can it ever be?
 

Consectetur reiciendis non fugit est ab. Dolore qui ducimus sit molestiae. Placeat aliquid debitis et a. Voluptatem et iure a iure aut veniam qui. Possimus dolorum numquam nostrum quia facilis deserunt incidunt. Qui totam consectetur vero reiciendis maxime quisquam quia. Exercitationem enim qui illum maxime sed earum.

Vitae consequuntur magnam et aut ut est. Ut rerum enim corporis. Porro enim repudiandae commodi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2025 Investment Banking

  • Goldman Sachs 01 99.5%
  • Evercore 07 98.9%
  • Moelis & Company 04 98.4%
  • Houlihan Lokey 09 97.8%
  • Citigroup 11 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2025 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 10 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company No 98.9%
  • Houlihan Lokey 14 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 97.8%
  • Lincoln International 04 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2025 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 08 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Houlihan Lokey 11 98.4%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2025 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (13) $317
  • Associates (58) $237
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (9) $210
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $167
  • 2nd Year Analyst (33) $166
  • 1st Year Analyst (98) $145
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (100) $103
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”