Market reaction to ER reports

I recently read an academic research report titled Information Content of Equity Analyst Reports. The study examines over 1000 equity research reports written by 50+ sell-side analysts from 11 different banks covering 46 industries. The biggest takeaway from this was that investors place the greatest reliance on the content of security analyst reports when it is a downgrade, and that the market reaction to price targets is most statistically significant compared to other variables.

Is it generally accepted that investors won’t rely as much on the content of reports when it is an upgrade or a hold?

Is it generally accepted that the market will react to price targets more than other variables contained in ER reports (e.g. % change in analyst earnings forecasts)?

6 Comments
 
Best Response

Probably because takes huge balls to have a sell or underperform rating on a stock and the only reason ou have a sell on a stock is if you are absolutely disgusted by it. That is the only opinion you can trust, if issued by an investment bank. The pressure to be bullish is tremendous for sell side analysts. Probably less so now than ten years ago, but still pretty high pressure.

 

[quote=SirPoopsaLot]Probably because takes huge balls to have a sell or underperform rating on a stock and the only reason ou have a sell on a stock is if you are absolutely disgusted by it. That is the only opinion you can trust, if issued by an investment bank. The pressure to be bullish is tremendous for sell side analysts. Probably less so now than ten years ago, but still pretty high pressure.

I understand there is pressure for sellside analysts to be bullish, and their upgrade recommendations hold less clout as a result. But there have to be reputable firms or sellside analysts that effect the market when they issue upgrades, right?

 
SirPoopsaLotProbably because takes huge balls to have a sell or underperform rating on a stock and the only reason ou have a sell on a stock is if you are absolutely disgusted by it. That is the only opinion you can trust, if issued by an investment bank. The pressure to be bullish is tremendous for sell side analysts. Probably less so now than ten years ago, but still pretty high pressure.

Are there any investment banks who have a particularly good reputation for not being overly bullish?

 
Analyst570 Are there any investment banks who have a particularly good reputation for not being overly bullish?

No. There are some specific analysts though.

 
Rdonahue7I recently read an academic research report titled Information Content of Equity Analyst Reports. The study examines over 1000 equity research reports written by 50+ sell-side analysts from 11 different banks covering 46 industries. The biggest takeaway from this was that investors place the greatest reliance on the content of security analyst reports when it is a downgrade, and that the market reaction to price targets is most statistically significant compared to other variables.

Is it generally accepted that investors won’t rely as much on the content of reports when it is an upgrade or a hold?

Is it generally accepted that the market will react to price targets more than other variables contained in ER reports (e.g. % change in analyst earnings forecasts)?

Can you provide me with the link of that report

Thanks

 

Excepturi rerum nihil harum nihil. Assumenda qui mollitia ut quia odio corrupti. Optio officia reprehenderit pariatur consequatur ea quisquam et.

Ut atque voluptatem nam sed dolor dolores. Libero possimus expedita eum vel officiis aspernatur odit quas.

Voluptatum veniam tempore est quae sit asperiores. Quidem et cum assumenda dolorem. Et saepe dolorem fugit ex voluptas quas. Sed autem et et ut facere et quae.

Officiis dolor quibusdam praesentium qui blanditiis laborum est totam. Aspernatur omnis sint culpa perspiciatis debitis expedita. Numquam nobis ratione laborum debitis voluptate. Est perspiciatis molestiae aliquid corrupti provident nam. Incidunt itaque rerum placeat rem quas impedit id.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”