Perfect Earnings Prediction? I’ll Pass.

How much would you be willing to pay for a model that perfectly predicted the earnings of the companies in your portfolio? According to Professors Feng Gu and Baruch Lev of SUNY Buffalo and NYU Stern –not much.

In their recent article, “Time to Change Your Investment Model”, published in the Financial Analysts Journal, Gu and Lev illustrate that,

The average gains from investing in the companies that will meet or beat the consensus estimate continuously dropped from 6% in 1989-1991 to 2% in 2013-2015: a 67% return decrease!
The stated return is over a 3 month period, assuming you predicted the earnings beat or hit 60 days before the earnings report and sold 30 days after. Since we do not have a perfect earnings prediction model available, we need to account for the occasional inaccurate prediction which could incur a loss, further eroding the maximum abnormal return of 2%.

But Why?

Gu and Lev assert that the loss of value in earnings prediction is due to a 40% drop of corporate investments out of tangible assets with a 56% investment increase into intangible assets since the early 1980s.

My question to you…

What does this mean for your investment approach? Do you even care? Let me know what you think in the comments below!

2 Comments
 
Best Response

The article is talking about GAAP earnings specifically, which I can confirm that (at least in my coverage) no one cares at all about. Most companies report some kind of "operating," "adjusted," or "cash" EPS that investors do focus on. I guarantee people would pay for a perfect adjusted EPS prediction every quarter, which is really what analysts focus on in their models, at least in our models. The article makes a good point that accounting standards have not kept up with investment in intangibles. All my companies add back amortization to their earnings.

 

Doloremque dolorum facilis expedita dolor. Laborum at exercitationem deserunt perferendis. Ex distinctio velit praesentium. Ullam aliquam distinctio accusamus eum in error magnam. Sint rerum autem non nesciunt. Amet quis numquam omnis maiores.

Delectus voluptatem non et non expedita. Sapiente similique cum illum officia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”