'26 Recruiting Experience (offers from MF PE, EB, and HF)

Hey everyone, Now that 2026 summer recruiting has wrapped up, I wanted to take some time to reflect on my journey and write a comprehensive post on what I’ve learned and to help others avoid common pitfalls and navigate the process more effectively. Thankfully, I landed offers that I'm truly grateful for, but the road wasn't always smooth. I’ll break this post down to 3 prongs generally that encompass the recruiting cycle: work experience, networking, and interview preparation. 1) Work Experience Prep: Fundamentally, the best preparation for recruiting is to develop a solid understanding of what investment banking, private equity, and related finance roles actually entail. This means seeking early exposure to businesses and learning how finance professionals think about companies. Typical freshman year internships might include working at a search fund, in corporate development, or at a boutique investment bank. From my experience, working with a search fund is particularly valuable because it forces you to think critically about evaluating companies, understanding key business drivers, and performing diligence - skills that IMO are pretty directly transferable. That said, if you're at a target school with a decent GPA, don’t stress too much about prestige in your early internships. Instead, prioritize experiences that genuinely help you understand business fundamentals and strategic thinking - in general I think if you’re at a target with a decent GPA, your lack of prestigious work experiences isn’t what is going to hold you back at all. In my PE interviews, I would actually use a lot of the logic/reasoning in terms of how to think about business that I learned working with a search funder. For HFs, the things they look for a honestly a bit different -  a lot of them don’t even look for prior experience in finance (maybe w exception of Citadel CAP which seems to be very focused on you having done quite a lot of hardcore pitches. The opposite would be DESCO which has like summer analysts that have barely done much in finance). That being said, HF positions are few and far between, and as good of seats as they are, don’t optimize for them because you can easily luck out of the process. Banking and PE interviews are much more similar and standardized.2) Networking: First, let me put it out there that everyone sucks at the first call. It genuinely sucked for me. Networking can feel overwhelming, but in general, I think there are some straightforward steps to make it more manageable and effective. First, be deliberate about your geographic focus. Most banks only let you recruit for one office, whether that's SF, Houston, or NYC, so decide early and strategically (e.g., if you want to do tech it probably makes sense to target SF) and I would say don’t waste too much time like talking to 3 analysts in both the SF and NY office (they typically run separate processes). Second, when reaching out to bankers, keep emails generally short and to the point (no need to tell them your love for banking/finance, just mention maybe something in common and then jump to asking them politely for their time). If you’re from a target school, alumni typically respond well, provided your message is authentic and doesn't come off as overly formal or desperate. Remember, bankers are literally often like 3-4 years older than you and often just want a casual conversation to break up their day; they’re not expecting you to impress them dramatically. Think of networking conversations as meeting a friendly senior rather than attending a job interview and that your goal is to make a connection by discussing common interests, clubs, sports, or even small personal details. This was something that I definitely got wrong at the start - I always expected myself to really try to use the opportunity to impress them but that was completely the wrong approach. If you’re from a target, and have had a few finance internships, you’re good - no need to flex the work you’ve done at all/how knowledgable you are. Be personable and be curious. In these conversations, maintain a semi casual but energetic tone, expressing genuine curiosity without sounding rehearsed. Networking is about being likable and showing enough interest that they’ll remember your name positively. Also, they typically won't drill you on technical questions - if they do, no biggy but depending on when you actually network (esp as you do it closer to the interviews) they might start asking some technicals. I had this once done by DB… but not a common situation in my opinion. 3) Interview Prep: Interview preparation requires a structured approach. First, it really is a really manageable load even as someone coming from a STEM background with no previous coursework in finance, etc. You should break it down just like how the BIWS guides do it (in terms of like core sections to understand). For technical preparation, I strongly recommend thoroughly studying the Breaking Into Wall Street (BIWS) or WSO guides. Work through all the questions and understand the underlying concepts very well. Many people say that you need to know the guides like the back of your hand but I don’t genuinely think that is the case. I think my technicals are definitely on the stronger side but even I definitely would not know every single bit - there are definitely some obscure parts in terms of what would get tested (e.g., goodwill in M&A for example, but if you do apply to like say Qatalyst for example be prepared to answer these haha), but your understanding should be robust enough to confidently discuss key topics and apply them spontaneously during interviews. Initially, you’ll struggle to work through the problems and think that there is simply no end to really covering all the topics-  then you’ll realize slowly that it is actually a very manageable load - just make sure to start early with at least a month of like consistent reading and practice (treat it like a class) and your brain will slowly soak it all up and you’ll be a technicals legend by no time. The next step is understanding the concepts is not enough - I REALLY RECOMMEND PRACTICING. This might be the single most useful aspect because we’ve all had that moment where we understand what’s going on in the class but walk into the exam and are like what was that? The best way to do well in interviews is to literally have seen similar questions beforehand. We aren’t geniuses doing crazy things out here, we’re just applying rules and observations to similar situations that we’ve seen before (just like LLMs haha) I think there’s a few steps to this, one is doing all the problems in the BIWS guide (not just the 400, but the ones that are specific to each topic too), then what worked best for me was using two platforms: IBVine . io  and Marginofalpha . org. IBVine has tons of learning materials (which I don’t recommend, I think you should just do the questions). IBvine dot io also has a free pro subscription for a week so I just recommend using that - however, IBVine doesn’t really have that many up to date questions and recommend you use those questions as the first pass - to see how well you are retaining the concepts. I recommend marginofalpha to really test the limits of your understanding, as they're much more comprehensive and have leaked questions. They’re sorted by bank specific questions that have been asked in the past and seem to be updated quite frequently (e.g., I did my PWP super day and had like half of the questions repeated that I saw on the platform) - hate the game not the player. This site unfortunately doesn’t have a free trial but would say that it is worth the value. Some of the technicals in here are extremely hard, so I’d say that once you have these down, you are absolutely good to go - stop focusing on technicals and work on telling your story and being personable. Lastly, carefully track recruiting timelines. There are expensive tracking services like hoos helpers (which has gotten absurdly expensive for absolutely no reason but them trying to milk it) but these aren’t necessary. Instead, use free alternatives like the Bristol Tracker that are literally just as good. Staying organized with timelines and deadlines is critical since early applicants often have a significant advantage. Hopefully this post is helpful to everyone - would appreciate a banana if it has been useful! For transparency, I’m a non diversity candidate at a target that eventually landed offers at MF PE, EB, and HF. Saying this only to establish a bit of credibility and say that it definitely seemed to have worked out in my favor and that reflecting on my journey I think these are the largest factors/ways I would have approached it if i had hindsight. Good luck with those that are still recruiting and hopefully this post can be useful for all future recruiting classes! If anyone needs any help, I now have more time on my hands so feel free to leave a comment and I’ll try to be helpful in anyway and DM you.TLDR1. Don’t stress too much, just find general experiences that teach you about finance2. Be personable rather than trying to impress3. Study BIWS/WSO guides, use IBVine. io for simple practice, use Marginofalpha. org for bank specific past questions and harder questions, use BristolTracker to keep up to date with apps 

🛠️ Mod Note:
For anyone recruiting right now — just a reminder that WSO offers a completely free Application Tracker with 3,000+ full-time and internship roles across IB, PE, HF, and more:

👉 Access it here

Also, we've made major updates to our IB Interview Course, including:

We’re committed to staying the most comprehensive and value-packed resource for finance prep — especially with all the noise out there.


WSO Team

66 Comments
 

You can optimise for HF FT after you've done a summer or two.

 

Sure, but I moreso meant the process is less random than summer recruiting at the big pods IMO. Assuming you actually work for it and have spent a good while learning how to work on stocks critically, its actually v attainable even if there are only three shops hiring undergrads.

 
Most Helpful

Fantastic post. One point I would add to the third point is to take your classes seriously, especially if you're studying business/finance. In my opinion, one of the best sources of finance knowledge is your university classes. Beyond the guides, your finance classes will give you another perspective to view and understand conceptual areas like the role of capital structure or what IRR is fundamentally. Try to take the upper-division finance and valuation classes before recruiting if possible. 

Also, don't immediately relegate classes like accounting or marketing as "dumb" / "boring" and ChatGPT your way through it. Looking back, I've gotten a lot of questions (especially in buyside interviews) about business strategy, cost structures, and operations, and I'm fortunate that I paid attention in my intro business classes. 

A major edge of studying business/finance is the curriculum. Take advantage of it. 

 

Undergrads and sellsiders pls keep this stuff on the IB forum. Most of us have a job and come on here to have a laugh or two.

 

Also, isnt that all common sense, to know your technicals and know what you do in the job? 

The German market is a little different thats why I am asking. Networking is optional and people usually get to Ib-roles with 3-4 relevant internships (Audit/FDD/VAL/SC M&A/...).

 

Wasn’t common sense to me - so much noise imo. Like I tried out the 400 first, then did PEAK, then so other WSP guide before BIWS. Would be much simpler if someone just said do BIWS guide and do all the questions there - it covers all and everything.

Then there is also a lot of noise on how to practice and good question banks. I used quite a few and many def weren’t good.

Then networking - I knew like the gist and the logistics but didn’t really know how I should go about it. Seniors always framed it as being super exclusive - like you have to network well to get the interview. So I thought impressing was important, which turns out to be a big misunderstanding.

Also as a STEM major I knew none of this and if I had a post like this back then I would’ve definitely appreciated it.

 

Hey completely understand. Have a few friends that are in similar situations- what I’ve realized is they often think they r doing something correct when in fact they are doing something wrong. This most commmonly is like shown in behaviorals where people are too rigid and stiff - have had a few friends recite to me their answers and my perspective was that it was way too boring and typical (also you kind of have to feel the interviewer). They wouldn’t have known if they didn’t ask others for feedback and I think this is also an important element - you never know what and if you’re doing something wrong until you get somehow from the other side to critique you.

Also afaik MMs and buy side is still recruiting so shoot as many shots as possible.

 

I see what you mean and that's definitely akin to some feedback I've gotten. Even if that's a negative for IB, honestly, being "stiff" in a professional environment especially when meeting people (e.g., interviewers I've never met) isn't something I'm ashamed of. After a certain point of prep and with full confidence coming into the interview, behaviorals (rightly so) reflect an applicant's personality, which isn't something you can teach. If their personality is a mismatch with the interviewer, odds are the conversation will be stiff. I don't expect (or want) to match the personalities of my coworkers though... I just hope to find a job in finance that doesn't require their applicants to be buddy-buddy with their interviewer in order to receive an offer. Obviously for IB that is the case and that's why I got screwed despite being top of my class.

 

Yes yes yes - great post. Remember to practice 1) Networking 2) technicals/behaviorals. You might think you are doing them well but there's really no way to gut check so ask your banker upperclassmen to help you check. Use platforms and questions banks to learn well and make sure you know your stuff

 

Great post. As a non-target who successfully recruited, I think the work experience point applies as to non-targets as well. From my experience as well as my peers, if you had an internship that was 1-real and 2-Even tangentially related to finance, you're fine, and the law of diminishing returns can start to kick in when you should be networking instead. I think getting caught up in trying to stack internships before recruiting starts sophomore year is a mistake and it's brutal to see career coaches on LinkedIn claiming you need 4 finance internships before you recruit. 

 

They key is to build relationships with people. Ideally, you start early before you have an immediate ask and you find ways to demonstrate your value. Applying to jobs alone won't get you there. There is so much demand and less roles. That's what worked for me and that's what I saw people who managed to make it do.

 

On networking with bankers, find people that are Associates or junior VPs. These are the ones who have enough time in the job to be helpful and not too senior that they won't talk to you. So many people reach out to them every day so find a way to be original. I remember a guy reached out to me and mentioning in the subject line of his email that he was playing tennis. It turns out I grew up playing tennis and he saw on my LinkedIn that I had mentioned tennis at the bottom of my about section. The guy was from a different school than me and aside from tennis we had nothing in common. I took the time to speak with the guy.  

 

this is true - I do have to note that personally i honestly didn't have a great connection with anyone in terms of outside hobbies but do think that is a very strong and valid way to approach things (the con is it is hard to have a connection like this at every bank). What worked for me was just seeming like a student who was proactive, not too boring, and decently well versed - hard to hate a person that you can't critique for any reasons. 

 

With recruiting coming up hope i can half a 10th of the sucess you have man, you should make an AMA post for us and bless us pls

 

Sequi autem aut quasi dolorum commodi. Consequuntur facere distinctio voluptas nihil nostrum. Sit eum accusamus dolores expedita repudiandae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”