Title pretty much says it
I'm looking to understand the hedge fund industry in depth and was thinking how analysts performance is judged, specifically in a L/S SM/tiger funds context. What does it mean to outperform as an analyst in these funds? Is generating huge pnl sufficient to be considered an outperformer? Or are you judged more on alpha? Also are you paid based on gross pnl dollars or based on alpha?
Thanks in advance
| +28 | James Fishback | 10 | 6h |
| +21 | Future of L/S | 5 | 3d |
| +12 | Looking for Fund to Partner With - LMM Activist | 4 | 1d |
| +10 | SM L/S Compensation? | 3 | 1d |
| +9 | Moving from credit to equity? | 3 | 5d |
| +9 | MMHF Central Execution Trajectory/Advice | 1 | 2d |
| +9 | How to prep for credit HF? | 4 | 1d |
| +4 | Jensen Huang | 1 | 18h |
| +3 | Chefs at Pod Shops | 2 | 3d |
| +1 | The best cover letter for L/S | 2 | 4d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Perferendis atque blanditiis impedit. Libero voluptas et quam magnam qui ipsa minima. Perferendis temporibus dolores cumque. Et veritatis laudantium et voluptates laudantium laborum.
A unde ut odit ut tempore. Officiis beatae explicabo sequi molestiae quaerat est. Fugit omnis unde dolorem eaque ipsa quae. Expedita est voluptatem omnis. Porro facere quis omnis in est quos. Soluta eum quis et minima nostrum eius.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...