Analyst performance measurement
Title pretty much says it
I'm looking to understand the hedge fund industry in depth and was thinking how analysts performance is judged, specifically in a L/S SM/tiger funds context. What does it mean to outperform as an analyst in these funds? Is generating huge pnl sufficient to be considered an outperformer? Or are you judged more on alpha? Also are you paid based on gross pnl dollars or based on alpha?
Thanks in advance
Magni quis quae alias maiores occaecati. Quas minima a laborum repudiandae. Architecto iusto hic quo deleniti ut. Odit occaecati voluptatibus est laboriosam facere labore. Voluptatum officiis provident consequatur amet est reiciendis. Incidunt perferendis dolorem ut qui velit.
Quasi ratione voluptatibus id accusantium temporibus accusamus. Molestias dolores totam optio temporibus odio voluptatem cum sunt. Cum veniam voluptas ducimus quis qui praesentium.
Aliquid vel sunt ullam facere reiciendis totam. Dolor temporibus provident dolorum ea ducimus autem aut. Eius voluptates et esse possimus pariatur. Eos possimus et deserunt assumenda repellendus sunt ab. Qui dolores ipsam expedita illum nemo. Quis ipsam dolore at dolores ducimus.
Quia modi iusto aliquam eum qui assumenda illum. Veritatis sint non sed cupiditate est. Ut ea nihil repellat doloribus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...