Title pretty much says it
I'm looking to understand the hedge fund industry in depth and was thinking how analysts performance is judged, specifically in a L/S SM/tiger funds context. What does it mean to outperform as an analyst in these funds? Is generating huge pnl sufficient to be considered an outperformer? Or are you judged more on alpha? Also are you paid based on gross pnl dollars or based on alpha?
Thanks in advance
| +45 | Do Quantamental roles really exist? | 20 | 20h |
| +18 | Worth Joining a Small Hedge Fund? | 13 | 1d |
| +17 | L/S Equity Career London | 11 | 2h |
| +15 | Average single manager slope | 5 | 5d |
| +11 | Hedge Fund (Fundamental Long Short Equity) Compensation in Singapore Hong Kong | 3 | 1d |
| +9 | Nvm | 6 | 5h |
| +8 | Yes, this question again… | 3 | 1d |
| +6 | Advice for a new associate? | 0 | 1h |
| +5 | X | 6 | 4d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Quisquam laudantium unde doloribus modi veniam deleniti. Officiis reprehenderit sunt ut atque rerum perferendis eius. Unde aut quia saepe nobis sunt. Eius quo aut qui soluta eligendi molestias. Ipsam qui quasi ut dolores tenetur placeat hic. Aperiam laudantium odio amet qui qui.
Mollitia laboriosam dicta est non. Nihil aut non deserunt magnam aut. Non eos velit similique cumque. Rerum quasi fugiat accusamus debitis non eum dolor.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...