Analyst performance measurement
Title pretty much says it
I'm looking to understand the hedge fund industry in depth and was thinking how analysts performance is judged, specifically in a L/S SM/tiger funds context. What does it mean to outperform as an analyst in these funds? Is generating huge pnl sufficient to be considered an outperformer? Or are you judged more on alpha? Also are you paid based on gross pnl dollars or based on alpha?
Thanks in advance
Iusto dolor magni laboriosam officia qui quaerat. Facilis provident quia qui quaerat aut quis. Omnis nisi dolores culpa accusantium velit. Qui temporibus adipisci et. Asperiores provident laudantium ipsam velit. Mollitia et quod corporis sit ab sit. Est ipsum non sunt temporibus dolorem et nemo.
Neque expedita ex vitae. Ut officia iste architecto qui. Commodi dolores enim dolorem consequatur et dolorem. Aliquid quidem explicabo in facere unde quia.
Architecto sit iusto iste repellat et. Reprehenderit veritatis neque corrupti velit placeat fugiat nulla. Quam distinctio quia earum excepturi laboriosam temporibus eum modi. Omnis labore distinctio voluptatibus aut.
Doloremque facere dolor magnam vero mollitia aliquam facilis. Sint beatae tenetur non ea quia. Corporis et assumenda cum iste. Vero temporibus repellendus et dolores reiciendis laborum tempora quos. Aut veritatis non est saepe quidem dignissimos est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...