Buyside Preparation
I'm currently recruiting for buy-side SA roles (OHA, Vista, D&C) and I'm not sure how to structure my long term prep.
With banking, there are defined guides (400 questions, BIWS), and questions you have to answer like "Walk me through a deal you've followed," but I don't know what the real "fundamentals" are for investing roles. Aside from staying up to date on market news and following a few verticals/companies closely for pitch questions, how else can I prepare? Any advice/resources would be much appreciated
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's how you can structure your preparation for buy-side SA roles effectively:
1. Understand the Fundamentals of Investing
2. Develop a Strong Investment Pitch
3. Stay Updated on Market Trends
4. Practice Case Studies
5. Behavioral and Fit Questions
6. Recommended Resources
7. Networking
8. Mock Interviews
By combining technical preparation, market awareness, and networking, you'll position yourself as a strong candidate for buy-side SA roles. Good luck!
Sources: Helpful Resources For Breaking Into Equity Research, Interviewing for a SA or Analyst position? Here's what I'd want to hear as a VP., Interviewing for a SA or Analyst position? Here's what I'd want to hear as a VP., How do I land a role at a commercial firm (JLL, CBRE, etc.) from scratch at 26?, PE Funds that Win - and IB that Tries
Cmon man at least try to search the forum..
15 years on the buy-side here, and former PM on a $1B 5-Star Morningstar rated fund.
There's no BIWS for buy-side recruiting. That's kind of the point.
Banking interviews test whether you can memorize. Buy-side interviews test whether you can think and use judgment. The questions aren't standardized, they're trying to see how your mind works when someone's poking holes in your thesis.
The stuff you mentioned--following the market, knowing your verticals, accounting, modeling--that's all table stakes. Everyone applying has that. It gets you in the room. It doesn't get you the offer.
The stock pitch is the interview. Everything flows from it. What's the market missing? What's your catalyst? What would make you sell? If you give vague answers like "macro pressures" - you're done.
Nobody cares how many hours you put in or how visually impression your deck/write-up is. They care if you can take endless amounts of data and figure out the 2-3 things that actually matter. Can you articulate risk in specific, quantifiable terms (not "competition" or "consumer slowdown" or "tariffs")--the actual data points that break your thesis and would cause you to sell
Biggest mistake I see...people spend weeks building the deck/model and zero time defending it. They can present. They can't fight. First time someone pushes back hard, they freeze, get defensive, or ramble.
Know the difference between describing and arguing. A book report walks through the company, the model, some risks. A real pitch says here's what the market believes, here's why they're wrong, here's what happens when they figure it out, here's what makes me sell if I'm the one who's wrong.
One sounds like a student. One sounds like someone who already belongs in the seat.
The fundamentals that actually matter: variant perception, catalyst timing, thesis-specific risk factors, sound primary research, sell discipline, and maybe position sizing logic. None of it's in a guide because it's not memorizable. It's a way of thinking.
Consequatur dignissimos et aut ea ad. Eveniet exercitationem accusamus voluptate delectus incidunt nihil. Nulla non sit recusandae. Blanditiis excepturi molestiae blanditiis consequatur doloremque in. Quia consectetur adipisci quaerat ut. Debitis repellendus dolorem architecto.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...