Confused about GMV math

Reading this random article that says:

"If a fund makes a 10% return on the stocks they hold long, and the stocks they hold short decline by 2% in the same period then the manager has a long-short spread of 12%. Hence, they have made a 12% return on their gross exposure, before expenses."

But look at Brett's math: His long short spread is 5.0%, but return on GMV is 2.5%? 

Image

Who is right? 

10 Comments
 

500MM gross exposure.

250MM long—increases 10% -> 25MM

250MM short—decrease 2% -> 5MM

30MM/500MM = 6% made on gross.

Brett Caughran is right in the spreadsheet (he probably spent plenty of sleepless nights worrying about this stuff so would trust him regardless). The person who wrote that random article prob trying to inflate #. Could also be saying return on nav which is obvs a different thing

 

like ya i guess. assuming 50-50 long short (so longs equal shorts). In practice even if running mkt neutral longs could outweigh shorts or vice versa depending on dollar volatility

 

Sorry if these are very basic questions but would appreciate if anyone could clear up some confusion I have:

1. Is the term GMV the same as the term “gross exposure” ?

2. What’s the difference between GMV and AUM ?

3. If a fund allocates a PM a $500m book, if he decides to only be say 80% deployed, does that mean that his GMV is running at 0.8*$500m=$400m ?

Thanks.

 

ChatGPT can actually help with these questions tbh

Easy way to think about it: gross exposure ~ how levered you are relative to equity (or original AUM)

GMV: value of your gross book. So they’re different 

 

Voluptates eaque voluptatem consequatur nemo labore veniam aperiam. Sequi ut aut mollitia aut est eos. Illo vero sint labore tempore voluptas amet. Animi quaerat omnis provident eius ea nemo officiis veniam. Error earum temporibus veritatis reiciendis consequatur qui nulla. Molestias corrupti aut nobis sint. Quos corrupti eveniet officiis esse magni.

Pariatur molestiae voluptate sit. Modi rerum nostrum qui vel ratione ut ut ratione.

Sit porro odio amet qui. Magnam ab mollitia aliquam. Saepe minima dolores hic eos a.

Quo recusandae voluptatem voluptas quasi similique. Officia dolorem veritatis numquam recusandae. Et eos debitis suscipit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”