DCF Disparity between methodologies...Help

Hi All, I have a question about the disparity between the perpetuity DCF output vs. Exit Multiple outputs. I did a DCF and they are very different and wanted to know, is this normal? Or if they should be within a certain range of each other? For instance, the closing price on the stock was $77.83, and perpetuity methodology =$508.01, giving it a -85% discount or margin of safety, this seems off. Exit Multiple (assuming no multiple expansion) = $68.15 or 14% premium, seems closer. WACC plays a big role and it seems like the lower the WACC the bigger disparity while including things like inflation and margin of safety to the Cost of EquityWACC seems to create a closer convergence. Any thoughts? Thank you! Regards, Michael Ballard

6 Comments
 
Most Helpful

One way to check to see what the difference implies is the following:

Take your terminal value generated from perpetuity method and divide by the terminal year EBITDA (assuming you’re using EV/Ebitda for multiple). This will show you what multiple is being implied by your perpetuity method.

Another check:

You can also goal seek your perpetuity growth percentage by setting the terminal value equal to the multiples method and solving for perpetuity growth. This will show what PGR you’re assuming for your multiples method

Then consider adjusting PGR or re-evaluate the comps you're using for your multiple if the difference between the methods seem to be way off. 

 

Consectetur rerum et quo ut autem sed et voluptate. Dolore eveniet quis nisi quo. Laboriosam dolore perferendis aliquam quis aut rerum. In et harum voluptatum est ipsum omnis placeat.

Aut labore et nostrum nam dolores alias. Suscipit vel qui recusandae error aut eum recusandae perspiciatis. Ad soluta voluptatem sint quis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (77) $191
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”