De-gross During Drawdown Question

Just wondering how much a PM at a MM/platform de-grosses their book by when they have a drawdown.

For example, how much would a PM de-gross by if he was drawing down by say 1.5% from the high water mark ? What about at 2.5% etc...

Thanks.

10 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some insights regarding how much a PM at a multi-manager (MM) platform might de-gross their book during a drawdown:

  1. Drawdown Limits and De-grossing:

    • PMs at MM platforms typically have specific drawdown limits. If a PM is drawing down by 1.5% from the high water mark, the de-grossing would depend on the platform's risk management policies and the PM's strategy.
    • For a drawdown of 2.5%, the de-grossing would likely be more significant. The exact amount of de-grossing can vary, but platforms aim to manage risk by reducing exposure when losses occur.
  2. Risk Management Practices:

    • Platforms adjust the amount of capital allocated to PMs based on market volatility. When markets become more volatile (e.g., higher VIX), less capital is deployed to maintain steady volatility of outcomes.
    • PMs may also hold back capital depending on their mandate and market conditions.
  3. General Guidelines:

    • The de-grossing process is often formulaic and tied to the magnitude of the drawdown rather than its duration.
    • PMs are expected to manage their portfolios actively to avoid hitting hard drawdown limits, which could result in capital or risk cuts.

These practices ensure that the risk of loss is managed effectively, and the volatility of outcomes remains within acceptable limits.

Sources: Performance of the best PM’s at MM’s?, Leaving a single manager to start a book at a platform, Leaving a single manager to start a book at a platform, DE Shaw L/S equity, HF PM Q&A

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Most Risk desks in MMs insist that, when you are drawing down, you take clear actions (including cutting deployment) to reduce chance of hitting soft or hard stop levels.

 
Most Helpful

You'll have a tiered drawdown grid. Platform and occasionally PM / strategy dependent. Nuances between platforms like P72 will give you flexible net and higher vol budgets if you're well proven. More strict at say C.

Usually goes along the lines of being structured in drawdown from peak and drawdown from zero / Jan 1 GMV. 

Illustrative example: 

From Peak (say +/- 100 bps captures 1 StDev of what's "market" atm):

  • ~150 bps on GMV: Nothing formal, just re-underwrite the book. Maybe re-underwrite big positions and justify residual risks (sector, factor tilts) and maybe >30D loss making trades
  • ~200: risk report to PM, discussion with risk team, resize positions and re-underwrite what hasn't worked, reduce loss making positions
  • ~350: bring in GMV and vol by ~25%
  • ~500: bring in GMV and vol by 50%, you don't have a good enough read of the tape, pause for a bit as you're doing something wrong... 

 From zero / Jan 1 (For first yr PMs / new hires you could see some max dollar loss limits as overlays)

  • 200 bps from zero: bring in GMV and vol by 25%, re-underwrite losers 
  • 350: bring in GMV and vol by 50%, formal risk report / sitdown, decompose root-cause of drawdowns, re-underwrite and resize book
  • 500: capital withdrawn... ciao...

All BS numbers but to give you an idea of structure. Different firms have different grids. Different asset classes have different limits (depends on firm appetite for vol in a given space). Seasoned money makers given more benefit of the doubt to turn things around etc etc... 

Curious if others seen different or largely similar setups... 

 

Incorrect... #'s are fine. You've confused yourself. 150 rolling from peak PNL. If you're up 7% and DD 150 bps do you get slapped on the hand formally? Doesn't make much sense now does it?

Also, can't be 'too lose' since it's what I operated with. When one caveats 'illustrative' and 'nuances between platforms' in an attempt to avoid daft debates where someone's personal experiences is being telegraphed to others as the one and only truth. The commercial realities are that we have varieties in risk limits, which - and you might wanna sit down for this one - could be different to what you' may have experienced.

Read it again & focus. +/- 100 bps differences (i.e. me: 350 vs. you: 250 = 100) → should broadly cover what we see in ~70% of the market (= guesstimate,  entire market, ≠ all platforms).

 

Veniam architecto ipsam voluptas earum delectus in. Earum numquam quia in est deleniti et et. Quam odio suscipit autem corporis. Sit ullam eveniet iusto tempore. Vitae illum laborum facere labore ut iure et.

Cupiditate sapiente perspiciatis eaque corporis provident maxime sunt. Vel ut ullam voluptatem aut nobis. Inventore necessitatibus nostrum nihil. Sit excepturi quae eos. Quod dolor odio voluptas pariatur rerum a.

Reprehenderit occaecati est ad qui sint minus minus. Officia omnis dolor sunt. Aliquam totam nisi impedit temporibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”