HF Age Limit
I've noticed HF tend to hire analyst direct from sell-side after 2-4 years' experience. For someone who made the pivot from an unrelated industry to sell-side research in late-20s/early-30s and with 3+ years exp, would this be considered too old for a position at a HF?
Also, considering the fact some analyst burn out and exit the industry even after 1 year, I'm sure biz dev and recruiters take this into account. Has anyone seen this? Thoughts? What are some of your experiences?
Based on the most helpful WSO content, age is not a significant factor in the HF business. What matters more is your ability to perform and deliver results. It's not uncommon for analysts to transition from different industries or roles into a HF position.
As for burnout, it's less common in HF compared to investment banking. However, it's not uncommon for some analysts to realize that they may not be suited for the role, for reasons such as not being comfortable taking risks, unable to think independently from consensus, or not being able to handle the pace of public markets. In my experience, about 2 out of 5 get found out in the first 3 years. But once you know you're in the right long-term career, it's far more rare to burn out.
As an analyst, you're constantly building your knowledge and refining your processes, so the job should become easier over time. So, don't worry too much about your age or the potential for burnout. Focus on building your skills and proving your worth.
Sources: Q&A: London L/S + event-driven analyst, 8 figures for late 20s/early 30s HF employees, HF Distribution of outcomes - by mid-30s, 1st Year HF Analyst taking questions
As a general rule, the window of opportunity narrows the older you get - but it never completely closes.
There was an MD at DB in credit research that was on the sell-side 20 years plus that just joined Apollo as a senior analyst. There that were two separate senior analysts at Goldman in GIR who also made that same move to the buy-side after 20 plus year sell-side careers. It can be done, but the move becomes harder because funds are looking for appropriate experience relative to cost to hire. That 20 year person on the sell-side maybe more expensive than the junior person, but still lack risk-taking experience unless that individual was sitting in a trading seat.
That said, the more time that passes the harder that move becomes. The vast majority of buy-side investors make their move from IB/sell-side research in their mid-to-late 20's.
To your specific question, yes you can totally join a hedge fund in your 30s. Did it myself and know many who have. That said, you are likely behind peers your age (both in seniority and comp) that had a more direct path. Nothing wrong with that - we all have our own paths. What matters is you eventually got there and cheers to you for doing it with the less traditional path. Keep at it and don't let age keep you from trying.
It's never too late. Look at all the bios on millennium or citadel's websites...many of those people hopped over from goldman / credit suisse / morgan stanley / etc in their 40s and 50s. same in PE
Thanks a lot. Really appreciate the feedback and the examples.
Don't forget that generally, the very experienced sellsiders decide themselves not to go in the buyside because it generally means a strong salary cut for them. As you gets older, you become less flexible on your lifestyle.
Madhu Kumar was a GS GIR VP covering biotech who just joined a hedge fund this year.
For background he graduated undergrad in 2004 and from his PhD in 2009 meaning he’s around 39 / 40.
Is he famous ?
No he’s just in my sector (not even ranked)… always thought I needed to scramble within 2-3 years to land a Buyside seat. His move just showed me that you don’t necessarily have to.
Also the fund is sub $500 million AUM so curious if his economics there vs making probably 700-800k at gs if not more.
Got it, I agree, although this forum may be useful it puts completely wrong concepts into your head, in fact, everyone has their own path
Voluptas est magni porro mollitia. Assumenda nisi et voluptatem sapiente labore impedit quod. Sunt ut et omnis sit est aliquid. Impedit est facilis facilis quae ea. Et suscipit id quas quo voluptates. Aut tempore in veritatis accusamus ipsum. Voluptate nulla omnis sit occaecati et molestiae quia impedit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...