Longer term oriented funds

Hi all, I'm wondering if you could point to some funds that invest over a longer time horizon, ie underwriting 2-5 year investment theses. My current job has a longer term orientation, and I don't think I'd be good at the 9-24 month style of investing that is common at a lot of funds. Am I SOL, or are there a decent number of funds that are more long term oriented?

12 Comments
 

isn't "long term" just an excuse for underperformance/not being able to find stocks that beat or miss earnings (the real skill that is valuable)? everyone else knows a company is great business or stock cheap

9-24 month is considered extremely long term now and even that is rare. don't know more than 2-3 funds that are willing to take a 30-40% drawdown (either absolute or relative to an index/factor basket) because in 9 months the stock is higher, much less 24.

you are also not maximizing capital to make high IRR. if another name in coverage universe is inflecting, why not sell your position to own that name especially if the momentum is on your side or chart looks coiled vs a stock with a weak chart/catalysts. flex capital up/down helps mitigate long drawdowns and reduces vol

2-5 even more rare and basically a unicorn. also the longer the hold the more exposure/risk you have to macro, factor, tilt vs. capturing the idio move

finally issue with v long term funds is you end up learning about 2-3 stocks. It’s great to read the 1988 10K on Berkshire but that is low value add compared to learning 10 stocks at the same time. Also prevents you from being wedded to positions. If you have written 50-100 pages on a stock and own 10% and something structurally changes in the business you are likely to not sell because you a) need to find a replacement and b) justify keeping it based on anecdotes of how great the company is based on prior scuttlebutt (which may have changed, eg kodak was an awesome business until digital camera came on, and someone could justify owning it even then because Kodak made their own digital camera, it could pivot to new tech, etc even though the competitor advantage had changed to a different plane)

 
Most Helpful

I would push back on this. A 2-5 yr investment thesis doesn't necessarily imply a 2-5 yr hold period. If you can be just a little more prescient than the market and identify a big catalyst 4 years out (a tech transition, for example), you should buy the stock and sell it once other investors catch on and the stock re-rates. Given the way information disseminates in markets, you could harvest that upside within 3 months.

If you're always chasing quarters and you cover 100 names, you literally don't have the time or resources to read about this new e-beam welding tech that might revolutionize nuclear energy, for example. And that's fine, because going down some rabbit hole is not PnL-optimal in the short term. But there is alpha for investors with more patient capital who can spend time looking around corners that others choose not to.

 

Thanks for your comment. I am a junior at a more LT oriented fund and am trying to figure out my investment philosophy / what kind of fund I want to work at.

To me, long term investing theoretically makes a lot of sense. If you can model out a company 5 years, figure out what the business will look like / how much earning power it will have / what multiple it should trade at, then I feel like that can be your thesis absent any identifiable near term catalyst. It makes sense to me that if you can identify big divergences between market value and intrinsic value, it can work to just wait for this gap to close as earnings compound / capital is returned / the market recognizes this divergence. If this is the nature of your thesis (and you're right), it works out whether the market starts agreeing with you next quarter or in five years. I think in some cases you don't even need sentiment to change -- if you buy something at 10x that you think is worth 14x, you get compensated with higher capital return even if it never rerates. 

My impression is that a lot of capital is flowing out of the medium to long term and into the short term, as multimanagers seem to be the only public equity strategy that actually works while the SM model is starting to look broken and LOs bleed assets. In theory, shouldn't this make longer term investing increasingly viable over time, as more capital is devoted to pricing assets over the next 6 months and less is devoted to pricing assets 5 years from now? Is there something I'm missing with this line of thinking?

 
Funniest

1) Make a post about wanting longer term investment firm

2) Random pod guy says longer term firms suck

Remember when WSO actually gave advice?

 

Adipisci temporibus sit consequatur repudiandae tenetur totam. Tempore voluptatem quod ea rem dolorem ut blanditiis. Et at impedit tempore voluptatem. Vel vel velit quis qui. Magni dolor corporis a aut temporibus inventore praesentium. Asperiores eum beatae unde quis dolorem.

Repellendus assumenda quibusdam necessitatibus cumque at et. Sunt corporis optio sequi dignissimos. Nihil aspernatur sit et corrupti repellat quae et. Eum doloribus similique minima tempore ipsum recusandae.

Aliquam quam non iure minima quisquam id. Distinctio laudantium culpa velit. Aperiam sint vero eveniet dolorem ut facere sed. Corporis blanditiis animi dicta unde deleniti sit tempora nesciunt. Porro nihil ratione aut est tenetur.

Officiis atque sunt est quibusdam quisquam mollitia quam. Magnam soluta veniam fugit veritatis aut id. Vel delectus enim id alias recusandae numquam facilis asperiores. Sed temporibus eligendi commodi iure id magnam modi. In praesentium laborum commodi amet. Accusantium at ipsa a explicabo ea repellendus iure.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”