It appears that MW is expanding their NA team, at least based on number of pings and discussions I've heard.
Curious - do people place MW at the same tier as Citadel / P72 / Millennium? Seems like a smart group but hard to tell.
| +38 | How much modeling do experienced HF analysts/PMs actually do? | 15 | 2h |
| +22 | Buy Side Credit - Seats / Guide | 8 | 21h |
| +18 | London buy side | 3 | 7h |
| +18 | Hedge Fund Pivot | 6 | 4h |
| +11 | Mid-career shift to buy side with niche background | 3 | 4d |
| +9 | Wfh / work remotely at MMs or SMs? | 5 | 3d |
| +3 | Atlantic Wolf Capital Closing? | 5 | 13h |
| +3 | How old is too old? | 3 | 1d |
| 0 | Walleye Capital | 1 | 2d |
| 0 | Hedge funds | 1 | 4d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Bump
Final bump...
I think they are quite smart but not at the elite level of a Citadel/P72. Would be a great opportunity to be a part of that buildout because they do have quite large US investors for being a European based firm
Lol what?
What was hard to understand? Having worked with all of them, thats my opinion
how come？ thought they are way more elite than P72/Citadel. AUM per person like 1 billion per investor, for P72 its not rare to see 500m split btw 3~4 people
Your post history indicates you did a case study recently for Point72 and were rejected. Sadly OP, you're not going to find unbiased answers on WSO. Many people cant get into firms like Point72/Citadel, so they shit on them even though they’d take an offer on the spot
why do you sound so attacked lol u work there? im not saying P72 is a bad place at all, I got rejected for one team's case study but passed the case study for another team and in final stages now. The second P72 team I interviewed had ~4ppl splitting 500m but the other team I talked to at Marshall Wace was almost 1B/person. If I have to say the MW interview experience was way worse compared to the P72 one, they asked weird brainteasers and cut me off while answering it which made me die inside. I interviewed with both citadel and P72 before MW and this kind of rudeness was unheard of. Honestly still traumatized by them but objectively saying the MW people that interviewed me were off way higher caliber than 72(EB top team > mega fund PE > MW; mega fund out of college > MW) and AUM / person was unreal.
It's quite simple. At beta neutral HFs like P72, it is not uncommon for pods to be leveraged 8:1, so that 500mm can actually be 4B. MW's strategy is long-only, and from their 13f it seems that they don't use any leverage. You should know this if you're recruiting for hedge finds. Anyway, like many other long-only funds, MW has been underperforming for quite a while. Beta neutral firms have been crushing it in the past two bear markets.
You’re the “dumberer” in dumb and dumber.
P72 leverage is at the back end. I.e each pod saying they have $500mm is $100mm of LP capital being levered up.
I can’t speak for all of MW but MW NA is pod-style with each pod managing several bn aum. When I spoke to them in 2018, I knew they were market neutral but not sure of how closely they looked at other factors. They have a more grueling process because they like to hire for the LT. The interviewers told me about a few rounds of case studies with the firm founders being present for the final case study round.
Not sure how much this has changed but at least 4 years ago, they had a more rigorous process than other pods.
I’m not saying this makes them better. Higher risk limits mean they probably pay PMs less but someone else can shed light on that.
Tempora beatae illo voluptatem vel optio ut dolor. Ad praesentium rerum ipsum soluta. Tempore corporis ipsum eaque tempore sed. Et cumque non dolorum accusamus quod. Ex velit vitae dicta quia aspernatur consequuntur et. Qui nulla magnam saepe voluptas provident inventore.
Libero accusamus dolorem ut quam dolorem soluta ex tempore. Aut voluptas sunt omnis porro iure nobis. Rerum molestiae amet sunt deleniti autem rerum. Sed quo dolorum quas ipsam. Et velit recusandae rem dolore minus reiciendis. Id consequatur quod maxime ex voluptatum omnis. Qui vitae ut iste officiis. Molestiae non aspernatur provident.
Ut dolor quasi omnis laudantium ullam delectus ducimus unde. Aut perspiciatis voluptas quam. Velit quae exercitationem ut aut accusamus recusandae. Consequatur vel et sunt amet aut illum sint. Suscipit laboriosam sint rem at architecto.
Aliquam voluptatibus tempore voluptatibus. Iure veniam debitis et eos. Aliquid qui praesentium ratione voluptas. Ad iure et minima cum est dolor. Et accusamus autem quaerat. Eos ex illum officiis distinctio similique id consequatur. Et pariatur rerum rerum ipsa ut alias rerum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...