Quant Pay Trajectory

There's a pretty good amount of info out there on the pay for regular traders at banks/hedge funds over time but I was wondering what the trajectory looks like for quants. How does buy side vs sell side differ, what about quant trading vs quant research? I know on average quants make more in the first few years but I know successful traders at both banks and funds can make in the low to mid 7 figures 10-15 years into their careers whereas it seems to me that quant pay seems to peter out near the 1M mark at a lot of places. I could wrong in that assessment just looking for some more color on the issue. Thanks.

 
Most Helpful

From what I have seen (and I have limited info, especially on the sell side):

I’ll start with my typical caveat that “quant” can mean 1000 different things, and the title is thrown around for many different roles. As expected, the closer you are to managing money/taking risk/etc the higher (and more variable) your comp will be. 

Generally sell side quant is lower pay (sometimes much lower). These roles tend to be more risk based or “support” roles and not risk taking roles (or even part of the “core” of what the business does). I’ve seen quants with experience on the sell side that are still in the $250-350k range after 5-10 years. 

On the buy side there is a very wide range (again depending on what the firm means by this role, risk taking vs not, more of portfolio construction or alpha, etc). “Good/Average” quant like roles (in a “good” area of the firm) will hit a ceiling around $600-750k (some will get to $1mm or so). For more upside you usually have to have one of the following: 1) be exceptional in the role, 2) be in an alpha generating role/have PnL 3) be more of a “manager” type of running a team. If you have one of those the upside can be large, but at that point you are focusing on outliers. 

The above is also for good places, there are many (at least that I’ve heard about) that silo the quants and take advantage of them (usually just need them to execute work and cap them out early). 

 

Please stop misusing the word traders, I copy/paste the definition of trader from a Citadel job offer for a trading position :

"Trading professionals on the Global Quantitative Strategies team support overall trade operations related to systematic trading strategies, which include ensuring effective trade execution (both automated and manual) within parameters established by Quantitative Research (QR). Traders work in a team environment that closely integrates trading, quantitative research and technology."

Trader => execution trader in 90% of HFs, and no they don't make 7 figures as no risk taking.

Back to the subject : talking only for buy side

Quant researchers often take risks/design strategies and if it is the case they are paid in the same range as a risk taking analyst at a fundamental shop/pod.

If they do more theoretical or global research like portfolio construction or more academic paper style, pay is less but stability and wlb are better. It is more like a tech job than an investment position.

 

They're market makers and taking on prop risk so yes, its way more than just execution. Citadel securities (prop trading arm of citadel)  and Jane Street upped grad comp package to 600k usd. Reaching 7 figs before you're 28 is very doable in the role if you're good. (This is hard as shit to be though).

High 7-8 figures comes from making partner/senior position at these firms.

 

If you are referring to the Quant Traders and Researchers at prop trading firms such as Optiver, IMC, JS, CitSec, etc., you are correct for assuming that they do more than just execution. Many of those firms have Quantitative Traders and Execution Traders as separate positions with different responsibilities and different levels of pay. 

The Quant Traders that you are likely thinking of work on some desk for a specific asset or asset class (e.g. index options, single-stock options, treasuries / FX options, etc.) and they do significantly more than just execution. Most work for these guys during the morning is focused on trading and managing their desk's positions / risk, and many of them are focused on project work in the afternoon when things start to slow down. Often newer desks have more "project" work than more established desks -- i.e. if your prop shop has traded EURUSD options for a while with many traders on that desk, then it will likely have less project work than a new desk that has just started trading something with less volume like maybe USDBRL for example. (Obviously this is just an arbitrary example for FX assets). One thing to note is that these QT's are usually very much aligned with the QR and Dev guys at these prop shops -- a lot of the time the signal generation and ML models may be the main role for the QRs here and the QTs have to be able to very much understand and apply these models when markets are moving in all directions. From my experience, the top QTs and QRs make the most money at these places, with devs topping out a little lower (but still making great money).

The other side of things away from the prop shops is PM/Research side of HFs (Two Sigma QR, Citadel, etc). The researchers in these roles often have the strongest pay because they are the ones generating new strategies and new alphas. The closer you are to generating alpha and managing risk / other people, the more money you make.

Sell-side quants at BBs are extremely variable and usually have a ceiling on what they make that is lower than a risk-taking QR at a HF or a QT at a market-making prop shop -- not sure how their hours compare though.

 

Quisquam nobis et impedit et placeat. Reprehenderit dolore quo excepturi ut. Ut error reiciendis minima porro quaerat reprehenderit nostrum. Ullam iure iste dolorem placeat.

Soluta labore placeat magni eum temporibus dolorem eveniet. Voluptatem qui dolorem rem vitae.

A impedit hic eligendi natus. Dolore quis modi odio animi officiis omnis id.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 18 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”