Research Process Interview Question
I've gotten the question a few times about how I would broadly "research a stock" both from MMs and SMs. Not really sure what they're looking for - typically just keep it high level and list of typical read filings, equity research, earnings calls, industry research, KPIs and related alt data. Feel like the answer suffices but not sure what exactly I should be trying to get across here. Any advice appreciated
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a structured approach to answering the question about how to broadly research a stock:
Initial Screening:
Equity Research Reports:
Earnings Calls:
Industry Research:
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):
Alternative Data:
Valuation:
Risk Assessment:
By following this structured approach, you demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the research process, which should resonate well with both market makers (MMs) and sell-side analysts (SMs).
Sources: Advice Please! Growth Equity Interview Questions?, Helpful Resources For Breaking Into Equity Research, On the Job With Simple As… My Research Process, How to go about stock research?, Network (In)to The Sell-side - How to Source Job Leads and Charm the Interviewer
Hey - been through this question a bunch of times, and I ask potential hires this as well.
They're really testing whether you have a reliable and repeatable process vs just throwing darts. Usually you'd want to demonstrate some type of "soft" systematic approach combining fundamentals and non fundamentals to build an investment thesis - sounds basic but it sets up that you're methodical.
The key is showing you can go deep while being practical/flexible. I usually highlight 2-3 areas I dig into depending on the company/sector. Focus on what matters for the stock.
Explain how your research actually drives investment decisions and how you arrive at conclusion. Saying you read company filings and reading sellside notes isn't a process, that's a basic hygiene factor.
Walk through:
Have a couple specific examples in your back pocket, even if they're from personal investing. Walk through how you analyzed the company, broke down the thesis, key metrics tracked, and how you validated/adjusted my assumptions over time. Way more compelling than just listing research steps.
Also worth mentioning any differentiated angles you bring - whether that's experience in certain sectors, creative data sources you've used, or unique frameworks for vetting assumptions. Just keep it genuine vs trying to sound overly sophisticated.
The key is demonstrating you have a reliable process while showing you're pragmatic enough to adapt it based on the situation.
Aspernatur quo nihil et alias atque. Voluptas ea accusamus aperiam velit quo veniam consequatur neque. Corporis est rerum natus iste aspernatur aut perspiciatis impedit. Nam assumenda soluta esse iusto aut et et. In corrupti harum dicta maiores dolorem dolores. Id facere ipsa aut sint ad hic nulla est.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...